Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Evening all!

Yesterday I received back from service a Seikomatic 6206B Automatic Movement.

As It had no manual wind function I built up the power by gently rocking for 3 or 4 minutes. I always like to put them on the timegrapgher when they come back, but this time the machine wouldn't even recognise the beat.. 1st inclination something wasn't right. 

I wore it for the rest of the day and it seemed to gain alarming amounts.. 10+ mins.

I recorded the time before going to bed placing the watch dial down. This morning the watch had lost only 10-15secs, not too bad..

I placed it back on the timegrapgher and it picked the beat up straight away... Some position deviations but nothing to worry about.. horah I thought..

For the rest of the morning I continued to wear it and record the rate, it lost a few seconds but was functioning properly. However as the day went on I noticed it gained alarming amounts one more. As it sits on my wrist now it's currently 11mins fast. (See attached pic)

I'm obviously going to send it back to the watchmaker to check over, however as I'm new to working with watches I thought it might be a question that someone might be able to put a theory to. Just to help my learning.

Apologies for the length of this post!

 

Screenshot_20200530_181116.jpg

Posted

As you rightly say "its going back to the watchmaker,".  sounds very much like a balance/balance spring problem.  touching coils, catching the cock or plate   

Posted
27 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

As you rightly say "its going back to the watchmaker,".  sounds very much like a balance/balance spring problem.  touching coils, catching the cock or plate   

Certainly will be, can't fault him to be honest, he's been excellent help over the years. 

It almost seems like as the power reserve builds it speeds up significantly.. yet as it runs down it returns to normal. Could bit be mainspring related?

Posted

I've had similar behavior when the cannon pinion is really loose, where any jolt to the watch would cause the minute hand to move around.  The watch would loose or gain a lot of time, but always look good on the timegrapher.  The same thing goes for a loose minute hand.  If you set the time to midnight are the minute and hour hands stilled aligned?

Posted
6 hours ago, Orologi67 said:

Demagnification possibly??

This was my first thought, I demagnitised it. No change.

5 hours ago, Walsey said:

I've had similar behavior when the cannon pinion is really loose, where any jolt to the watch would cause the minute hand to move around.  The watch would loose or gain a lot of time, but always look good on the timegrapher.  The same thing goes for a loose minute hand.  If you set the time to midnight are the minute and hour hands stilled aligned?

The hands do align as they should.

Thing is it's following a very regular pattern of irregular behaviour if that's a thing haha!.. again this morning it had only lost a few seconds overnight and having tested it again just, it's not gaining or lossing very much at all. It will be interesting to see as the day goes on and the power reserve builds back up if it starts to rapid gain once more.

Thanks all, I will update later :thumbsu:

 

Posted

As expected, it behaved for a while this morning bit as the day went on the speed increased once more. 

Off to the Watchmaker tomorrow. 

Thanks again everyone

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...