Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Long story short, I am in possession of an old staking set in need of a whole lot of love. I am currently and carefully removing the rust from everything to see what is salvageable and what is beyond usability. It is my hope to get a good deal of it restored. For the record, I want a usable tool, not an antique for resale.

The one place that i am indecisive is the box ... specifically the tray in the box. As you can see from the attached pictures, it's in a sorry state. One one hand, to keep it as original as possible, I can glue up the existing breaks and fashion a 'dutchman' for the missing bits, or I could re-fabricate it out of a nice piece of clear maple or fruit wood. Or, (and no eye-rolling please) I could 3-D print a replacement tray.

 

Suggestions?

 

 

complete-before.jpg

stakingset-before.jpg

box-before.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

If the original tray has exposed side-grain it should be possible to glue it. If there's only end-grain then it is unsuitable for gluing.. that might help to narrow down your options. Many of the PVA glues available (and especially the resin PVA) are stronger than most wood.

Making a new piece is likely to be no more difficult than re-gluing, but it will require a bit more arty thought if you start to consider whether to keep the same number of holes or layout.

I'd be tempted to repair that broken piece - provided there's side-grain, and that it will join neatly, with little damaged / disturbed wood not sitting right.

 

Regards,

  • Like 1
Posted

Like JG  I would be at it with the glue and keep it as original as possible, It looks like it will make a good set,  try soakong one or two of the rusty bits in coke or vinegar to kill off the rust then polish with wire wool and finish with wire wool and oil  good luck you have the makings of a good set,         Cheers

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks guys. On closer inspection, while the grain is going in the proper direction for gluing, it looks like this isn't the first split. There seem to be at least 4 other glue joints. I'm not sure it's feasible to keep gluing. 

 

Here's the first round of cleanup. 

set-r1.jpg

set-r2.jpg

stake-d1.jpg

stake-r1.jpg

stump-r1.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

I am close to finished. I am really pleased how well the tools cleaned up. I ended up 3D printing a replacement for the broken pieces. While it may not be authentic, it certainly is utilitarian.

 

 

finboxclosed.jpg

finboxopen.jpg

findetail.jpg

finset.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted
47 minutes ago, JBerry said:

Nice job! What did you end up using to remove the rust?

Good question. I had looked into the faster and more aggressive methods of acids or electrolysis, but went with a product called Evaporust. It's most important characteristic is it doesn't react with the base metal. It's a chelating agent formulated to specifically break the oxygen bond in rust. It's basic chemistry, but it is rather slow acting and kind of pricey. 

I gave the set a 24 hour soak before attempting to break it down to parts and then soaked another 24 hours. The stakes and stumps sat submerged in a jar for a good 48 hours. Then, everything got a nice warm clean in the ultrasonic -- broken into manageable lots. Finally rinsed in hot water and thoroughly dried. (see second set of images).

I then set about polishing each piece with a soft wire brush or 320 grit wheel on a small Dremel tool. Finally wiped each with a lightly oiled rag before putting the tray.

I rather enjoyed the whole process. :) 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • I agree with hector it's probably the regulator curve, it almost always is on these movements. So i work on these movements a lot and iv'e managed to fairly consistently get them running at like 50 degrees more amplitude than that with deltas in the 3 range and on the wrist deviations of sub 1 second a day. They ALWAYS require work to get there though. The main thing is shaping the regulator curve and this is really finnicky and definitely something you practice on a movement you don't care about when you're new (I'm still new) but if the hairspring is flat and the coils are evenly spaced and the regulator curve is properly shaped and it's pretty wild how accurate these movements can get.  But, it does sound like your regulator curve maybe needs a bit of reshaping. You can easily mess up the watch learning to do this so warning if you don't want to live with your current results but I"m not an expert, it's just speculation but there's a pretty easy way to check.  This is a good video showing how to see if your terminal curve is properly shaped. Just make sure the regulator pins are open when you test this.   He takes off the balance wheel to shape it. I do it with the movement disassembled but the balance on the mainplate. I use a homemade tool from a sharpened dental pic to do the adjustments (Tiny tiny TINY adjustments) and i use the regulator pins themselves to sorta brace the spring against to bend it very tiny amounts and just keep checking it by moving the regulator arm down it till it stops moving the hairspring. Taking off the balance wheel over and over again is a good way to slip and destroy your hairspring and will make the process way slower. I try to avoid removing the balance wheel from the cock it on these movements due to how difficult it is to get the hairspring stud back into the balance cock. It's super easy to slip and twist your spring then you got way worse problems.  Since these are mass manufactured and unadjusted the regulator curve is NEVER perfect but once you learn how to reshape them it's pretty easy to do and you can get REALLY low deltas with really low positional error and pretty remarkable accuracy.  Definitely with it powered down and the balance on the movement with both balance jewels in place look across the spring to see if it's perfectly flat, then check the regulator curve how he does it in the video. I would bet money even if it's not your main issue the regulator curve is not ideal also. 
    • Thanks. Damn, first breakage. This picture of the movement is from the sale listing.  
    • Hello all, New member here, hoping  to gain knowledge about something that has been of interest for years.  Cheers!
    • So the stem is snapped and will need replacing but luckily there's enough left in the crown to unscrew without a problem. Will need to see photos of the movement to identify it.
×
×
  • Create New...