Jump to content

Staking set box restoration.

eccentric59

By eccentric59
in Tools & Equipment

 Share

Recommended Posts

eccentric59 WRT Addict

eccentric59

Posted
Posted

Long story short, I am in possession of an old staking set in need of a whole lot of love. I am currently and carefully removing the rust from everything to see what is salvageable and what is beyond usability. It is my hope to get a good deal of it restored. For the record, I want a usable tool, not an antique for resale.

The one place that i am indecisive is the box ... specifically the tray in the box. As you can see from the attached pictures, it's in a sorry state. One one hand, to keep it as original as possible, I can glue up the existing breaks and fashion a 'dutchman' for the missing bits, or I could re-fabricate it out of a nice piece of clear maple or fruit wood. Or, (and no eye-rolling please) I could 3-D print a replacement tray.

 

Suggestions?

 

 

complete-before.jpg

stakingset-before.jpg

box-before.jpg

  • Like 1
JGrainger WRT Addict

JGrainger

Posted
Posted

If the original tray has exposed side-grain it should be possible to glue it. If there's only end-grain then it is unsuitable for gluing.. that might help to narrow down your options. Many of the PVA glues available (and especially the resin PVA) are stronger than most wood.

Making a new piece is likely to be no more difficult than re-gluing, but it will require a bit more arty thought if you start to consider whether to keep the same number of holes or layout.

I'd be tempted to repair that broken piece - provided there's side-grain, and that it will join neatly, with little damaged / disturbed wood not sitting right.

 

Regards,

  • Like 1
watchweasol Distinguished Member

watchweasol

Posted
Posted

Like JG  I would be at it with the glue and keep it as original as possible, It looks like it will make a good set,  try soakong one or two of the rusty bits in coke or vinegar to kill off the rust then polish with wire wool and finish with wire wool and oil  good luck you have the makings of a good set,         Cheers

  • Like 1
eccentric59 WRT Addict

eccentric59

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks guys. On closer inspection, while the grain is going in the proper direction for gluing, it looks like this isn't the first split. There seem to be at least 4 other glue joints. I'm not sure it's feasible to keep gluing. 

 

Here's the first round of cleanup. 

set-r1.jpg

set-r2.jpg

stake-d1.jpg

stake-r1.jpg

stump-r1.jpg

  • Like 3
eccentric59 WRT Addict

eccentric59

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I am close to finished. I am really pleased how well the tools cleaned up. I ended up 3D printing a replacement for the broken pieces. While it may not be authentic, it certainly is utilitarian.

 

 

finboxclosed.jpg

finboxopen.jpg

findetail.jpg

finset.jpg

  • Like 4
eccentric59 WRT Addict

eccentric59

Posted
  • Author
Posted
47 minutes ago, JBerry said:

Nice job! What did you end up using to remove the rust?

Good question. I had looked into the faster and more aggressive methods of acids or electrolysis, but went with a product called Evaporust. It's most important characteristic is it doesn't react with the base metal. It's a chelating agent formulated to specifically break the oxygen bond in rust. It's basic chemistry, but it is rather slow acting and kind of pricey. 

I gave the set a 24 hour soak before attempting to break it down to parts and then soaked another 24 hours. The stakes and stumps sat submerged in a jar for a good 48 hours. Then, everything got a nice warm clean in the ultrasonic -- broken into manageable lots. Finally rinsed in hot water and thoroughly dried. (see second set of images).

I then set about polishing each piece with a soft wire brush or 320 grit wheel on a small Dremel tool. Finally wiped each with a lightly oiled rag before putting the tray.

I rather enjoyed the whole process. :) 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Birbdad
      Regulating is too touchy

      By Birbdad · Posted

      So i work on these movements a lot and iv'e managed to fairly consistently get them running at like 50 degrees more amplitude than that with deltas in the 3 range and on the wrist deviations of sub 1 second a day.  They ALWAYS require work to get there though. The main thing is shaping the regulator curve and this is really finnicky and definitely something you practice on a movement you don't care about when you're new (I'm still new) but if the hairspring is flat and evenly space and the regulator curve is properly shaped and it's pretty wild how accurate these movements can get.  But, it does sound like your regulator curve needs a bit of shaping if you don't want to live with your current results but I"m not an expert, it's just speculation but there's a pretty easy way to check.  This is a good video showing how to see if your terminal curve is properly shaped.   He takes off the balance to shape it. I do it with the movement disassembled but the balance on the mainplate. I use a homemade tool from a sharpened dental pic to do the adjustments (Tiny tiny TINY adjustments) and i use the regulator pins themselves to sorta brace the spring against to bend it very tiny amounts and just keep checking it by moving the regulator arm down it. Taking off the balance wheel over and over again is a good way to slip and destroy your hairspring. I try to avoid it on these movements.  Since these are mass manufactured and unadjusted the regulator curve is NEVER perfect but once you learn how to reshape them it's pretty easy to do and you can get REALLY low deltas with really low positional error and pretty remarkable accuracy.  Definitely with it powered down and the balance on the movement with both balance jewels in place look across the spring to see if it's perfectly flat, then check the regulator curve how he does it in the video. I would bet money even if it's not your main issue the regulator curve is not ideal also. 
    • AndyGSi
      Where it begins

      By AndyGSi · Posted

      So the stem is snapped and will need replacing but luckily there's enough left in the crown to unscrew without a problem. Will need to see photos of the movement to identify it.
    • Birbdad
      NH34a GMT and date quickset not turning over

      By Birbdad · Posted

      That is really concerning if there's chinese knockoffs that close floating around. iv'e seen speculation but never any proof beyond some VERY obvious knockoffs that were clearly copying the design of the nh movemetns but didn't even attempt to copy them cosmetically. 
    • Birbdad
      So who actually uses a winder for seiko mainsprings?

      By Birbdad · Posted

      Doing the #6 arbor #7 winder mismatch absolutely is necessary as far as i'm concerned.  This washer trick however is pretty damn genius! I actually had an idea for a homemade tool made out of sheet that could act as a retainer for these springs while you work the arbor out of the center coil. 
    • Embezelled
      Where it begins

      By Embezelled · Posted

      Sorry, beginner error. The inside is marked 3ADJ 59079. That's all I can see. I assume the caseback has the s/n, the only number there is 1307085. The 2.3 mm I mentioned is as measured from the underside of the cap to the end of the thread. So about 40% of that is the unthreaded part.  
×
×
  • Create New...