Jump to content

Elgin 345 Broken Stem?


Recommended Posts

This is probably very obvious but I'd like to be certain. Attached is a picture of the two pieces of the stem I pulled out of my Elgin 345 pocketwatch. This stem is broken right? I can't seem to find a single picture of an Elgin 12s pocketwatch stem online. Images of other stems don't look nearly as long as mine would be if it was in one piece. Nevertheless the watch won't set or wind so something is wrong.  

I'm still getting familiar with the keyless works on different timepieces. I wasn't sure if somehow these two pieces function independently. Thanks.

stem.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Hondadoug said:

Yes, broken. I have not run across a full length stem in an elgin myself, but that is simple compared to the 2 piece stems most cases require. Would love to see the case for your watch. Try Otto Frei for a stem.

Thanks for your insight. It's been difficult to find a stem for an elgin this long. I've attached a couple pictures of the watch.

elginface.jpg

elgincaseback.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has the stem worked for winding and setting since you've owned the watch? I ask because the combined length of that stem seems excessive to me. It looks as if someone dropped the piece of another stem in there, following it with the original upper piece, in order to extend it. Sometimes a small piece of the square stem can get you working, but I've never seen something that long being used. It appears to me as if something isn't right about that stem. And I don't mean that it's merely broken. Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, MrRoundel said:

Has the stem worked for winding and setting since you've owned the watch?

I considered that possibility. When I first got the watch it wound and set fine. It's the only pocketwatch I've had so I don't have a feel for these things but I thought the mechanism felt a bit loose. I just took it out of the case for the first time and figured the stem had already broken yet was being held together somewhat. Or perhaps I broke it by angling the movement out of the case. 

If it were in one piece. The end of the stem would seem to rest properly in the groove cut out in the movement. Excuse my lack of proper vocabulary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose it's possible that it's correct. Only you can know how much you forced the angle of the movement to remove it. Did you at least pull out to the setting position before you tried to remove it from the case? Did you look under high magnification to see how the broken ends match up?  The upper end of the bottom piece looks purposely rounded off to me. No match means it was like that when you got it, right? Unless you rounded it off. 

Have you tried putting the bottom piece into the movement before attempting to tilt the movement in, and adding the top piece and crown after? You may have to remove the sleeve from the pendant to do it properly. I'm just thinking out loud. Hopefully someone else can add to the theories. Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you post an extreme close up of the stem parts? 
all my Elgins have 2 piece stems, and they have been fitted to each pair.

Even trying to exchange cases and movements can cause problems. It seems like the stem is matched and must stay with the case. I find the adjustments to be quite sensitive. Is this normal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Hondadoug said:

Can you post an extreme close up of the stem parts? 

It is quite apparent to me now that these two pieces are not from the same stem. MrRoundel was correct in seeing the beveled edge on the end piece. If the fit of the stem is truly unique to the original then I suppose I'll have to figure out how these two pieces were intended to work when they were put in there

closestem.jpg

mechanism.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That matches what I have encountered. The lower piece is part of the watch and the upper is part of the case. The length and setting of the upper is critical to function . The stem is adjusted by a collet in the case, with the crown removed from the stem. There is a special tool for this purpose. I don’t yet have one. The last one I did took at least 5 try's to get working. I have another that is close but not correct. That movement is not original to the case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅 The oil is repelled by every surface of the epilame even that which it sits upon. So the oil pulls together to make as little contact with it as possible, but the oil cant float above that area, it can only sit there on top of it. Under gravity the oil could potentially run away as an oil bead, unless the epilame has an adhesive property which i dont think it does ? So something else keeps it in position ie a pivot under a cap jewel . But that isn't the case in a pallet jewel situation. 
×
×
  • Create New...