Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Please help me identify this watch.   I find nothing about Julius Ewoldt watches.  I can't get the back open.  I've tried but ii feel like I'm damaging it.

20200302_210257.jpg

Posted

The name on the watch is probably just a retailers name, there was a jeweler registered around 1900 in New York of that name, pictures of the back of the watch would help, some watch cases are screw on.

Posted

I got the case open!   It was pretty gunked up and just needed extra coaxing. 

Anyway, the movement is engraved with the same Julius Ewoldt New York20200303_101734.thumb.jpg.0cc5ca1f7cea03eaf324aeb07646edbe.jpg. There is a movement serial number of 1666774 and, on the regulator cap is a swiss cross and the numbers 1683. That's it for markings.  I agree that the jeweler of the same named makes perfect sense.   We have long ties to 1800s NYC.  

 

20200303_091745.jpg

Posted

Hi,

The movement is a Longines Cal 19.75 the patent refers to the regulator and was filed in February 1899, so the watch you have is a private label Longines signed both on the movement and dial by the retailer, the serial number of the Longines movement dates it to between 1904 and 1905.

Posted
16 hours ago, wls1971 said:

Hi,

The movement is a Longines Cal 19.75 the patent refers to the regulator and was filed in February 1899, so the watch you have is a private label Longines signed both on the movement and dial by the retailer, the serial number of the Longines movement dates it to between 1904 and 1905.

Not to knock your knowledge, but it looks as if the cal. 19.75 movement has a single bridge plate for the train, whereas the cal. 19.71 has the 3 separate bridges for each gear in the train. If I'm wrong, I'll retract this post.

e8624600021e6e4fe896e45ab8a07b22c378cafc.thumb.jpg.6023a164a1b8eddd5fc6b4f265480e19.jpg

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
    • Get well soon Old Hippy, torn muscles.,  not good
    • Id love to see how he has the output shaft mounted to this setup, as I have the same rotary stage and stepper in my build.
×
×
  • Create New...