Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an older scrap movement with a train bridge of the long slender variety.  It has two screws, one on each end, and contains only the jewels for the center wheel and the 3rd wheel.  Both jewels are rubbed in.  This is one of the first movements I bought, and did not have the ability to successfully free the jewel by the correct method.  Instead, I reamed out the hole using a .229mm reamer from my Seitz jeweling tool, and confirmed the remaining hole is parallel, sharp, and very clean.   

I purchased from Otto Frei a 2.30 mm OD jewel with the proper size jewel hole.  (The third wheel pivot measures .16mm, and the jewel I ordered has a hole of .17mm.)  I have recorded the depth of the original, badly cracked jewel before removing it.  Installing a new friction-fit jewel at the right depth should not be an issue.  

In retrospect, I would think I should have mounted the bridge on a cement chuck and using a lathe, and an appropriate tool; coax the rubbed-in metal open, allowing the rubbed in jewel to fall free.  My question stems from my inability to accomplish this. 

How does one mount an irregularly-shaped item (like this long curved bridge) on a cement chuck in order that the jewel hole is perfectly centered, and there is no wobble when the lathe spins?  I would be using shellac as an adhesive.    

I've searched about a bit, but as a novice, I probably don't yet know the correct questions to ask to get help from sources like google or youtube. 

My only option was to provide a long-winded explanation of my issue.  Any replies would help me greatly moving forward. 

 

 

 

Posted

The easiest thing to do with plates and bridges is to cement them to another larger brass plate, then center this in the faceplate. The centering can be checked with a wobble stick or optically with a scope.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you, nickelsilver.  You're always very helpful.  I'm guessing by faceplate you mean one of these?

faceplate.png.d4323bf0cf6aadb9240047b12271dcbb.png

If I only have a cement chuck, such as this:

1558227257_cementchuck.png.a66c8a26b52e614e5c9c1d1629f4fd55.png

can I still accomplish what you speak of?

I understand one can tap work into place on a faceplate.  A cement chuck would have to have the work affixed and in place in a very short window of time, i.e. before the shellac hardens.  Is this possible? 

Could one maybe mount a centering stake to the tailstock and while the shellac is hot, position the work onto the cement chuck mounted in the headstock with the jewel hole centered?  I appreciate everyone's patience.  I've taken Mark's 3 courses, and have probably spent days on YouTube, but I've never seen this scenario addressed. 

 

Posted

Hi  The method mentioned by Nicklesilver is the preferred method but lacking the face plate the method you propose using the lathe and centering whilst the shellac is still soft is also possible. Both methods are explained in De Carles book "practical watch repairing" 

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi  in regard to your questions,   The springs should ideally removed from the barrel but to do this you need a mainspring winder that are quite expensive for a one off. Or you c a make your own see Google “ joes mainspring winder”. I have made two and they work well, you will also have to source some tube for the retainers. the gathering pallet cann be removed using levers ( mini crow bars) again I made my own no problem. the case can be glued using evostick wood glue but bind the case together to close the crack. When solid you can use wax sticks (used for furniture) melted and rubbed in to cover any blemish left. best to clean the case and then use bees wax to polish, a bit of elbow grease needed  do not clean the dial with anything other than warm water and a couple of drops of mild soap. Try on an inconspicuous part first. There is a product called MILIPUTTY in various colours on eBay that can be used on cracked enamel dials depending on how bad it is .
    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
×
×
  • Create New...