Jump to content

Faulty movement or me?


Sam79

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Purchased an ETA movement a couple of weeks ago and the date mechanism appeared to be faulty. It wouldn't 'click' over at midnight but instead started to gradually roll over from about 11:45. Added to that, once the stem was put into the date change position, it would spin the hour & minute hands around making it impossible to accurately set the date & time. 

I connected the supplier who requested the movement was sent back for inspection by their watch maker, who came to the conclusion that the movement was of poor quality and I was refunded in full, as he had also checked another couple from stock which had similar issues. Although I should clarify that the watch maker only mentioned the problem with regard to the date not clicking over, but nothing about the hands spinning. So I'm not sure if he tested it with a dial & hands. 

But I was still left needing a movement and found another supplier. Unfortunately, it appears to have similar faults to the last one. I say similar, because there is some marginal improvement in the quality of this mechanism. However, the date change on this movement still suffers from the same gradual roll over problem and the hour hand spins when trying to set the date. 

Has anyone experienced similar problems? Could it just be a badly manufacturerd movement or is it something I'm doing wrong? 

Thank you in advance for any help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, there are a whole range of designs in the field of date changing mechanisms.
Some movements use spring loaded  date clicks to get a nice and crisp date change while other just use a gear and rely on friction to hold the date ring on place while date is changing, this style is found on ETA quarts and some clones too.
Many of the latter once starts sliding the date over sligtly before midnight and can be finished at midnight or a littl bit after.

But all movements should have a position where you could set the time without the date moving, except when it is supposed to do that. If you turn the time for 24hours ahead the date will also change a day. If both date and time moves at the same time it is an erratic behaviour.

Depending on the quality of the movement i guess ETA might have less quality control of the production and might let one or two erratic movements through but I hardly Think a whole batch would slipp through to the market.
Since you didn´t say which movement it is you had it makes it impossible to answer all of your questions but hope you got some answers.
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, HSL said:

Well, there are a whole range of designs in the field of date changing mechanisms.
Some movements use spring loaded  date clicks to get a nice and crisp date change while other just use a gear and rely on friction to hold the date ring on place while date is changing, this style is found on ETA quarts and some clones too.
Many of the latter once starts sliding the date over sligtly before midnight and can be finished at midnight or a littl bit after.

But all movements should have a position where you could set the time without the date moving, except when it is supposed to do that. If you turn the time for 24hours ahead the date will also change a day. If both date and time moves at the same time it is an erratic behaviour.

Depending on the quality of the movement i guess ETA might have less quality control of the production and might let one or two erratic movements through but I hardly Think a whole batch would slipp through to the market.
Since you didn´t say which movement it is you had it makes it impossible to answer all of your questions but hope you got some answers.
 

Thank you HSL for taking the time to answer my question, it's much appreciated. 

The movement is a ETA255.462. With regard to forwarding it 24 hours it does start moving the date over at around 11.45, so by 11.55 it's in-between dates. I did consider the possibility that this wasn't a fault and just a design feature, although it seemed strange (I'm new to the watch hobby and wasn't aware that some movements don't 'click' over). 

But both movements (from different suppliers) carried the problem with one or both thr hour & minute hands spinning when the stem was placed in the date change position. 

I have successfully fitted a couple of ETA movements previously with no problems but my confidence has been dented with this latest project. It just seems strange that both movements would have this fault, particularly when they're quite an expensive ETA. But if I am doing something wrong,. I can't figure it out. I've removed and refitted the dial and hands a number of times just in case one or the other wasn't seated properly but it all seems fine. 

The watch maker said that this is just the way that particular movement is. However, I can't be sure if he was referring to the date change over and/or the the hands spinning in the date set position. 

Thanks again. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took a quick look at the service sheet for this movement and it seems like it rolls over the date with the gear number 23 in the schematics. So probably a slow change of date. The quick date setting is gear number 27. 
Otherwise it should function as a normal ETA Quartz movement with the settings.

Calendar_Setting Wheel.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you once again HSL. I have so much to learn. 

The roll over is a design feature then, but the date set position shouldn't affect the hour & minutes hands? The fact that it has happened on both movements from different suppliers might suggest it's an inherent fault because I can't think of anything I've done wrong. 

I wonder if the hands I'm using could be causing the problem. Is that possible? They're from an Omega seamaster. I was told that this movement was a direct replacement for the the original mechanism so I thought the hands would be a natural fit. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a fault thats how it is designed. However if you are not happy you can remove the hands re- fit in your preferred position IE re-fit them @ 12:00 when the date is just changing and then the date will be fully changed @ approx 00:45.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wonder if 9415 is based on a base oil of 941? it's interesting what questions bring and the tech sheet answers it's the viscosity of the base oil. Then the impact? There is something we're missing here for that which would have a big influence on all of the house image above is 9514 image below is 941.then always interesting when specifications do not exactly agree? They ledge above for 941 indicates 110 viscosity but the image off the spec sheet is slightly less but I guess close enough   my understanding of the concern of too much 9415 is as we know the loss of amplitude. But why do we have a loss of amplitude? So impact it's basically oil should be very slippery. But what about non-impact? Like the edges of the escape wheel? Another thing that comes to play here is the shape of the escape wheel itself. Notice on the last a more vintage escape wheel with just a flat surface whereas the modern escape wheels usually made out of steel versus grass much much thinner their contact areas greatly been reduced and sometimes I think there even slightly curved. So is it conceivable at everything that isn't a flat surface on impact is going to be sticky? So this is where the shape of the escape wheel will have a big impact literally on how slippery things are. Oh and for all of you obsessed with worrying about too much 9415 I never worry about it because typically I'm doing pocket watches and it doesn't seem to be an issue at all. on the other hand I'm much more concerned about a watch that keeps time for 24 hours as opposed to the concern of the group of keeping amplitude for 24 hours. Then yes some pocket watches have steel escape wheels and do look like the escape wheel on the right.   
    • your balance wheel looks interesting in the watch and because it's at an angle it's changing things a little bit. in other words they hairspring is not centered between the regulator pin in the boot and I also noticed your terminal curve is lacking apparently by design? Because if you look in the second image you'll notice yes there's a terminal curve but not as aggressive a one as you normally see on watches at least most watches.   then in all of your images it looks like the boot isn't quite back where it's supposed to be? out of curiosity how did you remove your balance complete and clear the regulator pin? then just in case you weren't aware it rotates out of the way so you can remove the balance complete without bending the pin. Then it's rotated back exactly 90° and yours looks like it's off by just a little bit in the original image and I'm assuming that you just been the pin out of the way? it's always interesting in horology is the variations in the things. Like the image I have above does have a terminal curve but not the most aggressive and yours is even less but that is the way the watch was made. Then the spacing between the regulator pin in the boot should be relatively small basically if you had two pieces of the thickness of your hairspring that's how much space should be there like in this image. But oftentimes watch manufacturers do not necessarily follow the rules  
    • Yep i can see where you're going with that one Rich.  Sooo now that I've frightened the OP into submission 😁. Chief i do apologise for some reason unbeknown to myself I'm in a happy silly mood. So seriously to identify the movement lets have a look at the dial side, learning this part is straightforward, just need a little logic and something called the # BESTFIT BOOKS # . Or the other non American equivalents. 
    • I can definitely see elephant and aardvark and possibly some sort of bird with a large beak 🤣 anyway I'll have a go of getting it flipped over tonight and send some pics
    • A Schild movements often have left handed crown screws. A pic of the keyless works would help identify it, and the size of the movement. Looks like someone has had a, not very subtle, attempt to decrease play in the centre wheel. And the hairspring looks like it needs some work. From the scratches on the bridges, it looks like it was last serviced by a drunken baboon, but it's a good movement to practice on. Good luck 
×
×
  • Create New...