Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

What is the best time keeping automatic movement in ETA, or other? I guess the question should be what's the best attainable as a sold movement only. Not interested in Rolex or any of the expensive movements, those don't interest me.

Nick

 

Posted

Time keeping improves at higher beats, ETA makes some 36000b/hr movements.Needless to say microadjustors on adjustment lever imrove adjustability, thence, improves timekeeping, A screw at lever with micrometer action is on some ETA versioms, A caliber like eta 2824 has several variations some beating at 28800 b/hr and others that beats 36000. Ones produced in Asia are of inferior guality to swiss. Another very important factor is parts avaiability, Swiss have by far better record than japs when it comes to spare parts, therefore, you should think twice about getting a japan made and if its Asian or swiss made.

Different brands use or make different grades of a caliber, that is the eta2834 in tudor is much superior to the same caliber you may find in cheaper brands.

Above all and thats my personal opinion, a detached manual wind beats them all, which answers your second question as well, A shield made some good ones.

A NOS movement would need fresh cleaning, yet is much much better than an old one.

Best wishes

Posted (edited)

With the SWATCH group making it a policy to no longer sell spares outside their group, the issue of future spares has become paramount. I doubt that I would think of the Swiss as favorable when it comes to parts availability. Shortages are already critical in with some movements and when a part can be found, prepare to open thy wallet and suffer accordingly. I can't agree with the comments regarding Japanese spares. They are both plentiful and inexpensive, at least in the USA.

The Chinese clones are getting better and I wonder how long it will be before counterfeit parts are openly sold. Many of the older Swiss movements have long since lost any patent protection. According to US Customs, up to 20% of luxury goods in our retail system, at any given time, are counterfeit. Some, so good that even professionals can be fooled. 

No, I wouldn't be looking to the Swiss for parts support anytime soon. If you can get your hands on a Seiko 61GS, you would likely own the finest hi-beat automatic movement available. At 36,000 bph, it is a proven design and a time honored classic. Oh yeah, parts are available readily too. Again, just my opinion.

Edited by TexasDon
spelling
Posted

What about Stellita movements? I guess they are making versions of the ETA that are not under patent. I don't know if they will do any new designs of their own. It would be nice to have  high beat stellita if they make any, as long as they don't go the way of the Swatch group....

-Nick

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, the specific old tools do exist, but may be having one is not needed as they are not cheap, and also You will be able to do without it well enough. My advice will be to use regular depthing tool and adjust it for the exact distance between pallet fork and escape wheel bearings from the watch. Then remove the shellac from the pallet that now doesn't pass the ew teeth and move this pallet in. Then put the pallet fork and ew on the depthing tool and check how they lock. They should not lock when the pallet is in, but You will little by little move the pallet out and locking will appear. Then move just an idea out for reliable work and apply shellac, then check if things are still the same. You have to observe where the teeth fall on the pallets - it must be just a little below the edge between impulse and rest planes. Then You must check how everything behaves in the movement This Potence tool is so ingenious, but actually, the traditional way to do the things is much more simple. Arrange the parts not on the pillar plate, but on the cover plate. Only the central wheel will remain on the pillar plate, secured by the cannon pinion.
    • There is a tool that was made for setting up and adjusting escapements of full plate watches.  There were two styles, the picture below shows both of them.  The lower tool held a movement plate and the vertical pointed rods were adjusted to hold the unsupported pivots of the lever and escape wheel.  There was also a version of this tool that had 3 adjustable safety centres so that the balance pivot could be supported by the tool :  The other version I’m aware of is the Boynton’s Escapement Matching and Examining Tool came as a set of two or three clamps that gripped the watch plate and held the safety centres for the pivots : These do turn up on eBay from time to time.  For some escapement work, you can set up the parts in a regular depthing tool, with the centres set according to the distance between the corresponding pivot holes on the movement.  I hope this helps, Mark
    • Once you are aware of the problem, you can adjust as necessary. I have a couple of the Omega 10xx, and they are not my favourites. They seem a bit flimsy and not as solid as previous generation Omega. But I think that's true of a lot of movements from the 70-80s. For me, the 50-60s is the peak in watch movements, where the design criteria was quality, not saving the last penny.
    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
×
×
  • Create New...