Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just received a watch with a ETA  2836-2 (Elabore) back from service.   I wore it for a day, then gave it about 20 winds, and gave it a few card dealing type shakes. I took it off a few times throughout the course of the day and gave it a few similar shakes until I could no longer sense the rotor turning and assumed it was fully wound.  I waited an hour and put it on my time graph.  Here are the results:

Dial Up: +4,   Dial Down: +4,    Crown Left: -5,    Crown Right: -3,    Crown Up: -5,    Crown Down: -12

I believe the ETA spec for this movement is 20 seconds maximum positional variation.  This one is at 16, which seems like it may be a bit high for just being serviced?  Is there anything specific that could be causing the crown down position to be that much slower?

Thanks for any help.  I realize it will probably change a bit over time.  

Posted

I've attached the specifications for your watch.  so to get your comparison right you have to set your timing machine the way they specify. Specifically 20 seconds between positions to settle down and 40 seconds measuring time. For the grade of your watch it's timed in three positions and 16 seconds is within the specifications.

I don't suppose you have a timing before servicing?

Then the reason why your watch is doing what it's doing is this is the way it was manufactured unless you have a previous timing that shows it was better at one time. So the most common thing affecting your positional errors would be the poise of the balance wheel.

Eta 2836-2 manufacturing information.pdf

2836-2 rate.JPG

  • Like 2
Posted

Thank you JohnR725, I really appreciate the information.  Before servicing the watch was at -12 crown down and -6 dial up.  The amplitude was lower prior to service.  It sounds like the watch, a Damasko DA45 is operating well within specs.   I'm not at all obsessed with accuracy of my mechanical watches as long as they are consistent.  This watch is my favorite tool watch and sees quite a bit of wrist time. 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Get well soon Old Hippy, torn muscles.,  not good
    • Id love to see how he has the output shaft mounted to this setup, as I have the same rotary stage and stepper in my build.
    • If you see at least one thread protruding, or even a half, then you may have a chance using this "tool", but don't squeeze hard. Lot's of patience, and if you notice any signs of loctite or other adhesives, then apply several drops of acetone on top of broken stem. Use heat (hair dryer) also. You should be able gradually turn it counterclockwise, just like i did on this broken Timex stem, which was glued with something like nail hardener. Then you can use an extender to save your broken stem. https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/513DVvkfW5L.__AC_SX300_SY300_QL70_ML2_.jpg   You can also try cutting a small grove / slot on top of the broken stem to use 0.7mm flat screwdriver.   Depending on the Crown material and Stem material, you can try dissolving the stem. 
    • How long had it been without any wind before you first put it on the timegrapher?  Perhaps there was some debris / old lubricant that loosened up while you were waiting to do the 24 hour reading? I recently serviced a Seiko 6319 that immediately after service was absolutely horrible on the timegrapher - 24 hours later (without me doing anything) it was rock solid!  I was a little surprised by this (as I have seen improvements in amplitude after letting it run in but never a watch going from useless to great!). I was suspicious that some dirt must still be in there so I took it apart and cleaned and lubcricated it again and had exactly the same experience - snow storm that after some hours turned into a nice straigh line with good amplitude 🤷‍♂️
    • Yes, I know it was able to run before just enough that everything supposed to be affixed with shellac could fall out. I won't get back to work on this watch for several days at least, but one thing you mentioned about the banking pin adjustments being intended for fork horn clearance got me wondering.... The last adjustment I made to the entry stone yesterday did not solve the problem when the balance is installed. The escape teeth can't quite clear the stone when the balance swings. But I thought it was going to work because manually snapping the fork back and forth did allow the escape wheel to advance almost all the time. I wonder if there's another issue with the impulse jewel, that I have to shellac again anyway. I am going to measure the fork slot and the jewel because I am curious if it is the right size or possibly narrower than it should be. My thinking is if the horn clearance is too great maybe it is not getting enough impulse to clear the escape tooth. But pushing the fork with a tool can move it far enough to clear the escape wheel tooth.  I'll see later in the week. I didn't expect a big challenge from this watch because it ticked for 5 minutes before stopping without shellac. As always I was way wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...