Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Haven’t been very lucky with my recent findings and getting them identified.

 

But I’m not throwing in the towel yet; here’s another peculiar one for you to look at.

 

Both movement and dial has a symbol ”3” insite a diamond. At least that’s my interpretation of what I see. And the no. 481 is stamped on one of the bridges.

 

Can’t find any references to the symbol or no. And hoping that someone more knowledgeable can help.

 

Photos are attached.

 

And btw. Both balance staff pivots are gone...

 

30b9a775a53a9fb8e7509bc91afd48f3.jpgy03de66787e7c321557f2aa56dc50f679.jpgff6c3e441cc659c848d793f5988e1920.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

You might find it on Ranfft.. I got a Guba 1050C just some feet away..

Guba 1050C.jpg

Edited by HSL
Posted

Not a bad shout there.  The bridges look pretty identical but the keyless works are slightly different.  Possibly another generation of teh same movement?

Until recently it was possible (but difficult) to view the Catalogue Officiel on Ernst Westphal's site, but they've revamped it and it's no longer there.  These come up on eBay or you can buy an electronic copy.  Have thought about it a few times, but then thought that mostly I'm looking things up because I like the challenges that others set! Other sources may be available, but see here http://www.watchmakingbooks.com/ebooks---pdf-formatted-books.php#!/Swiss-Watch-Parts-Catalog-1955-edition-digitally-enhanced-PDF-eBook/p/19103710

 

Posted (edited)

Hi @bsoderling That sure looks like a '3' ... but it's actually a 'Z'. This then makes it a watch made by ZentRa.

Here's another watch by ZentRa with the symbol and the name of the company on the same dial to confirm this: http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?13&ranfft&0&2usau&1259164803&

Here's some information on the ZentRa brand in general: https://www.watch-wiki.net/index.php?title=Zentra 

This site mentions that ZentRa used PUW, A.Schild or Miverva movements in the main. I also guess that, as a German watch brand, they might have used other German movements which might help steer things in identifying your movement. Are there similarities to a Junghans 680.71 for instance??

 

Edited by WatchMaker
Posted

Can´t believe I have missed that 3 ..Z part even though I wear one today (ZenTra) and posted pictures earlier in the watch of the day.. 
One learn something every day...

Posted

Hi,

I think we nailed it! 

The Ranfft link provided by Watchmaker also mentioned that Bifora movements were used by ZenTra and a quick search on Ranfft fo Bifora point me towards the Bifora 102/1 (without some jewels, just as mine) that seem pretty identical. 

So now on to finding a balance staff for Bifora 102 (may not be that easy ...)

Thanks guys for all the help here!

And if you have spare time to waste, there's always my two other id cases alive here on the forum... :-) 

 

Posted
Hi,
I think we nailed it! 
The Ranfft link provided by Watchmaker also mentioned that Bifora movements were used by ZenTra and a quick search on Ranfft fo Bifora point me towards the Bifora 102/1 (without some jewels, just as mine) that seem pretty identical. 
So now on to finding a balance staff for Bifora 102 (may not be that easy ...)
Thanks guys for all the help here!
And if you have spare time to waste, there's always my two other id cases alive here on the forum... :-) 
 

aaa8d2ecaca24955a35f02a964b2f02a.jpg

It’s a bifora 102

ecd0a676d33beba0aaf30cce2ed419ff.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
4 hours ago, bsoderling said:

I think we nailed it! 

LOL! Great stuff! Feel free to spread the love with some 'Like' or 'Thanks' tags! :)

4 hours ago, bsoderling said:

And if you have spare time to waste, there's always my two other id cases alive here on the forum

Cheeky blighter! :biggrin: Okay ... when I get a spare 15 minutes I'll have a look for you. No promises mind!

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, WatchMaker said:

LOL! Great stuff! Feel free to spread the love with some 'Like' or 'Thanks' tags! :)

Cheeky blighter! :biggrin: Okay ... when I get a spare 15 minutes I'll have a look for you. No promises mind!

Thanks Watchmaker, I'll try to remember that. Not too used to likes and stuff like that. You're talking to a guy that doesn't even have a Facebook account, if you can believe that :)

And thanks to Busakaz. I presume the catalogue pages are from one these famous Bestfit or similar catalogues I hear so much about? In any case it's definitely my movement in there.

Regarding the balance staff, both Cousins and Balancestaffs.com refer to this as Ronda 370 whereas the catalogue and Ranfft calls it     U 371.

Ronda I know as a manufacturer of many items in this area but the "U" is one I don't have any reference to and would appreciate some education on. 

 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
×
×
  • Create New...