Jump to content

Rolex Lubrication


Recommended Posts

I will be servicing my Rolex submariner later on this year and was checking what lubricants are required and the service sheet I have shows PML 163 on many of its parts.

Looking at the diagram I would say it is where normally D5 would be applied. Am I correct or is there another equivalent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be servicing my Rolex submariner later on this year and was checking what lubricants & itinerary that are required. The service sheet I have shows PML 163 on many of its parts.

Looking at the diagram I would say it is where normally D5 would be applied. Am I correct or is there another equivalent.

 

 

 

Rolex service.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi clockboy,

 

Thanks for the pdf which I downloaded. Although I can't really tell you much about it, I've read that Rolex has developed different oils for their watches. I have a feeling that a substitution for a proven good quality equivalent won't harm the movement. In any case, Nye PML doesn't look expensive and the ofrei site has a very high recommendation for this oil (considering they sell equivalents at a higher price = better for the business) They prefer it over all the rest according to them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Clockboy. 

I have done some research into PML163 and it appears to have been replaced by PML80. 

Can't find much info on them but the PML products appear to be based on natural ester blends (much like D5) or PAO synthetic oil (like Moebius synthetics 9000 and 9100 HP series).  

If used where D5 then perhaps Moebius HP1000 or HP1300 would be best choices.  

The esters (natural or synthetic) are used to improve lubricity of normal oils (often seen used for pallet stones etcM 941/9415) and seen in Moebius 8000 series and Microgliss D series.   PAO (PolyAlphaOleophin !!!!) has much better natural lubricity then normal oils so does not normally need an ester.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your research. The selection of oil is very confusing to say the least. I read that if you know the viscosity of the oil to be replaced it makes it easier to decide if the alternative is suitable.

Thanks again Canthus much appreciated will search the net for Moebius HP1000/HP1300

 

This service of my Rolex has made me nervous to say the least but it has been on my wrist for 6 years so it,s time.

I really don,t want to make a basic error of the wrong lube.

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Clockboy

The viscosity is probably the most important aspect.  HP1000 is 1013 cSt @20C which is approx 300cst @40c, HP1300 is 1267@20c & approx 310@40c so not much different.  D5 is1200@20C and approx 300 @40C so nearer HP1300 so either would suffice.  .  It would appear that concensus for PML80 replacement is D5 but D5 is not PAO like HP1000/1300. Can't find what PML163 or 80 are, so if you find out let me know. I am developing a spreadsheet for watch/clock lubes, but cannot release to forum in case there are copyright/brand issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Never seen that but yes very practical Hector 
    • Welcome, Simeon! I'm into Soviet watches too (not the political system, and yes, I am able to make the distinction, unlike some). They offer amazing value for money. I like your "Big Zero" profile image. It's a true classic and I have one of those myself. I noticed that the hands aren't the original. Not that it matters a lot but here's an interesting article about the Big Zero if you haven't already seen it.
    • I was thinking will the gasket stretch at all to match the desired size.  Did i also deduce that the original gasket is thinner (0 .5mm ) than the cousins gasket ( 0.8mm )  could that just be an effect of you measuring the case for the gasket size  H  ?
    • if we look at and understand why steel becomes magnetised and unmagnetised then its possible to work out why some devices are better than others. Simpy it is a parallel alignment of atoms , electrons within a material caused by external magnetic fields. Different magnetic fields cause different alignments and non alignment of atoms. Fields by AC currents are changing atom direction approx 50 times per second ( 50hz ). As a material is drawn away from a demagging device the field is becoming progressively weaker while also changing the material's atom direction having the effect of returning their random directions ( demagnetising ) . To improve on this demagetising effect, try changing the material's orientation as it is drawn away.  Fields caused by DC currents have the most permanent magnetising effect as the currect is flowing one way only. A good demagger would produce random magnet fields and disorientation of the material's atoms.  
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.  
×
×
  • Create New...