Jump to content

vintage pocket watch mainsprings


Recommended Posts

Quick question,  where to buy old but new mainsprings for old pocket/fob watches?

I'm in need of one at the moment as the arbour end snapped off, my measurements are as follows

height 1.95mm

thickness 0.24mm

approx 300 mm in length

inside diameter of barrel is 41mm

now ive hunted through cousins with no success, ive also tried putting in the exact measurements of smiths ingersoll dollar watches mainsprings but again im coming up with nothing.

anyone have any ideas please cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit confused, Cousin's search tool doesn't seem to be working right now, but you can see what they have here https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/upto-200mm-height

More confusing are the dimensions you have given. Is this a regular 30-40 hour lever escapement pocket watch, or an 8 day watch? A 41mm barrel is the size of a watch, and whatever the barrel size, 300mm sounds short.

You may find that you don't have the right spring fitted, and you need to work out what should be in there.  There is an excellent expanation of how to do that here http://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/blogmainsprings.php. I can't remember if it tells you but you need a spring heith with about 0.2mm clearance to the internal barrel depth.

Photos would help if you need more advice, and we all love to see them anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so for a 14mm barrel, the calculator says the mean spring thickness would be 0.17mm and length 439mm.

A 0.24 thick spring will give more power, but will have to be shorter to fit the barrel, and is only going to give you 4.5 turns, so unlikely to run for more than 20 hours or so. You aren't going to find a spring this size so you would need to cut one down to get this if you really want to.  I would be inclined to use the thinner spring which will give you the right number of turns.

Cousins search is working again now... not sure if it was me or them.

There are very few 1.95 high springs, so in the 1.9 range, GR5607 is your closest bet, assuming you need a regular hooked bridle end spring, or you could use 5616 which is slightly thicker at 0.18mm.

I would still check the barrel depth to make sure you can't fit a higher spring. If a 2.0 will comfortably fit then you could go for GR5853

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuart you are a star, very niceley explained and easily understandable so much so that I will use your method for future springs that I need for ancient pocket watches.

One final question, I will have I will have a look myself across the net, but would you know the correct size spring for a 16 size waltham traveller?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verging on a new thread here, but still pw mainspring related.

You can use the GR catalogue on Cousins site https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/7815_GR Pages 191 - 200.pdf

but you will need the movement type which you should get from here https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/guide/company/waltham/serial-number-lookup

if that doesn't get you there then post more details, or search at NAWCC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuart many thanks my friend, your knowledge is far greater than mine,I shall have a good look this evening when I finish at the coalface, and yes it is a normal hook bridle, no fancy t bars etc on this old movement. It hasn't even got a case, I just wanted to get this old movement running again, it will probably sit in a box somewhere after this until I can source the correct size case, then knowing me it will sit with your collection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it's not pretty, 1 due to the condition of the jewel holding area prior to work and 2 no  sietz jeweling tool in sight and 3 never done this before.

well whilst working on this old unknown ladies size 6 (34mm plate diameter) fob watch I ascertained it needed a new mainspring, help was given on sizing as I couldn't find an exact match by a very helpful forum member Stuartbaker

new mainspring fitted and then as another post in this thread mentioned I needed a replacement balance cock jewel.

i took a gamble and bought a random mix from red rooster on the bay. As luck would have it there was a few in the mix that looked like they would do the job.

so away I went and took the cock apart and started the job

 

IMG_7460.JPG

IMG_7463.JPG

IMG_7464.JPG

IMG_7465.JPG

IMG_7470.MOV

Edited by transporter
Attempting to upload short video
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I was referring to the (jewelled) gear train with HP (most of the time, I use 1300, but when Rolex says 1000, I'll use 1000).
    • did I miss the update of the message of something changing?      
    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
×
×
  • Create New...