Jump to content

Seconds Hand Fitting Tools Advice


chrisbuxton27

Recommended Posts

Ok so I have a cheap Chinese hand pressing tool but I'm not happy with its build quality. It's fine for fitting hour and minute hands but there is play in the shaft which becomes worrying when fitting the seconds hand. As we all know how susceptible the seconds pinnions are to breaking. Also a lot of the vintage omegas are spring loaded or have a jewelled bridge at the rear. Is there anything available for supporting the jewel whist pressing the seconds hand on with a precision tool. I've been using a minute wheel attached to the base of the hands pressing tool to support the jewel and praying while pressing the hand on... Any thoughts or tried and trusted methods please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually use a staking set to install hands.

 

For the hour and minute hands I use a hollow flat stake, choosing a hole size that just fits over the minute hand arbor for the hour hand, and one that just fits over the seconds hand arbor for the minute hand, and pushing down gently by hand (no hammers). That way the stake comes up against a positive stop when the hand is in place and the tendency to push the hand too far down the post is eliminated. As a result there is almost always sufficient clearance between the hour hand and the dial, and between the hour and minute hands, the hands always go on square, and the only time any adjustment is necessary  is if a hand is bent out of its correct shape.

For the seconds hand my staking set has a stake with a plain, flat, brass tip and a plastic ball on the top (so designed for pushing by hand rather than hitting with a hammer).

 

As far as supporting the other end of the seconds hand arbor, this has never been an issue for me. As a rule, if you have to apply a lot of force to get the hand on to the post then its probably the wrong size hand. It should really only require light pressure to get it to seat, but nowhere near enough to damage the supporting bridge or jewel. If the movement has an indirect driven centre seconds hand with a tension spring bearing on the end of the arbor then this should flex enough to allow the shoulder of the arbor to contact the jewel or bridge for support without any harm coming to the spring.

 

The exception to this is chronograph centre seconds hands. When you reset the chrono the seconds hand rotates back to zero very fast and comes to a sudden stop. Because of the length of the hand and the speed of rotation, inertia is likely to cause the hand to slip around the post when the post stops at zero so unless the hand is a tight fit, it would be constantly going out of alignment.

For this reason  you should always use the correct movement holder which will have the proper support for the lower bearing built in to it.

 

Basically, use the right movement holder for chronos, and a light touch for everything else.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very good question Chris.  I'm looking into the same thing.

Using the standard Horotec hand fitting tools is fine for basic movement; but as I move on to more and more expensive movements (some these days over a thousand dollars), I'm not happy using the standard tools for fitting the hands.

 

I was considering this tool from Horotec, and any input from the seasoned veterans would be most appreciated...

 

post-246-0-88875700-1411643529_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the detailed reply Marc. I've just bought a staking set with a red nose on the top and a brass pin at the base. Will give it a try. As for the chronos it's not always viable to purchase a movement holder for every repair job. Think I will invest in a 7750/1164 as its a very popular one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...