Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I purchased a Rolex cal. 2135 fitted balance wheel, staff and roller from a dealer in California. The parts all appear to be authentic, as opposed to generic. However, I have a problem in that the hairspring collet from my original balance doesn't fit the new staff. The diam. of the aforementioned being .5 mm and the  hairspring collet hole being circa .3 mm. I am wondering if there are variations in cal. 2135  balance staff dims. and hairspring collet hole dims.  I can't enlarge the hole in order to fit it to the staff and I don't want to dissemble the new balance and turn down the staff

Will I be able to get a cal. 2135 hairspring with a larger collet hole , if not what is the solution. I would be grateful for any assistance that can be afforded to me on this matter. Thank you.

Posted

Im not sure that mixing and matching balances and hairsprings is a great idea, as they are matched at the factory for poise and beat. The best bet would probably be to obtain a balance and spring complete. However, reaming out the collet hole 0.1mm shouldn't pose too much of a problem, as it still needs to be slightly smaller than the balance seat for a friction fit.

Posted

Thank you for taking the time to reply to my post. The problem with acquiring a  balance complete is of course the prohibitive price, most of the vendors advertising Rolex parts are attempting to out -retail the aforementioned, in some cases, doubling the manufacturer's recommended prices. 

I had thought of enlarging the collet aperture, but  was concerned with damaging the hairspring. The other option would be to dissemble the roller and turn down the staff with the balance wheel intact. Opening the collet would appear to be the lesser of the two evils, but how would you suggest that I safely secure it in order to do so. The only way I can think of would be by utilising my staking tool set.

I reiterate my thanks  to you for replying and would be further grateful for your advice on the best way to safely secure the hairspring in order to enable me to enlarge the collet aperture.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, diatribe said:

Thank you for taking the time to reply to my post. The problem with acquiring a  balance complete is of course the prohibitive price, most of the vendors advertising Rolex parts are attempting to out -retail the aforementioned, in some cases, doubling the manufacturer's recommended prices. 

Just a note, there is no "manufacturer's recommended prices" when it comes to Rolex parts. Their policy is to sell to authorized service centers only. Still, new original parts can somehow be found, sure can be expensive, but unless you take the route above, there could be no alternative for repair.

Posted
9 minutes ago, jdm said:

Just a note, there is no "manufacturer's recommended prices" when it comes to Rolex parts. Their policy is to sell to authorized service centers only. Still, new original parts can somehow be found, sure can be expensive, but unless you take the route above, there could be no alternative for repair.

I fully appreciate that Rolex don't supply parts to anyone other than authorised service centres and was referring to parts asking prices  for the aforementioned. As previously stated, the prices being asked by unauthorised sources are  both prohibitive and unrealistic..

Posted
1 minute ago, diatribe said:

I fully appreciate that Rolex don't supply parts to anyone other than authorised service centres and was referring to parts asking prices  for the aforementioned. As previously stated, the prices being asked by unauthorised sources are  both prohibitive and unrealistic..

Just curious, how much are we talking about in your case?

Posted
4 hours ago, diatribe said:

Thank you for taking the time to reply to my post. The problem with acquiring a  balance complete is of course the prohibitive price, most of the vendors advertising Rolex parts are attempting to out -retail the aforementioned, in some cases, doubling the manufacturer's recommended prices. 

I had thought of enlarging the collet aperture, but  was concerned with damaging the hairspring. The other option would be to dissemble the roller and turn down the staff with the balance wheel intact. Opening the collet would appear to be the lesser of the two evils, but how would you suggest that I safely secure it in order to do so. The only way I can think of would be by utilising my staking tool set.

I reiterate my thanks  to you for replying and would be further grateful for your advice on the best way to safely secure the hairspring in order to enable me to enlarge the collet aperture.

Ideally you would use a tool such as this....but one similar could probably be made, or given the size that we're talking about here, even a hand broaching vice might work, such as the second picture. Just be mindful of the hairspring stud and make sure it's not being pinched while holding the collet.

 

3007.jpg

LBR002A.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...