Jump to content

Pierce Calibre 103 Parashock


Recommended Posts

Digging through everyone’s favourite auction site, I picked up what I was hoping to be a neat addition in the military watch category. Only had 30 mins to make up my mind, so I jumped on it for a tenner bid and won.

 

$_1.JPG

 

http://www.ebay.ie/itm/191329879939

 

After digging a bit, I’ve confirmed that it is a Pierce Parashock with a 15-jewel Pierce Calibre 103 movement. That would date it to the 1940s. The bridges even appear to have some nice geneva stripes and finishing - though it looks like it desperately needs cleaning...

 

15318617591_131d6a74b9.jpg

ID’d from: http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Pierce_103

 

The movement has “Pierce Watch Co.” stamped on a bridge with the letter “M” stamped by itself over near the ratchet wheel. No other apparent markings. The case back is stamped with the serial number 35880. The back is secured to the case with 4 screws at the lugs with a case shaped gasket sandwiched between, hence waterproof and airtight. Well, back in the 40s perhaps!

 

The case and dial appear to be all original. The case is chrome plated but a lot has flaked off and the case base metal looks a bit banged up, probably pitted – looks like brass. The dial is an unusual two-tone white and black with “Fab. Suisse”. The hands appear to be replacements with faded blue tinted lume though they too look aged. The original hands would probably have been the thinner diamond shapes typical of military watches like the A-11s, probably black framed with a white interior. The "vintage" strap probably needs to be replaced.

 

I found just one other picture of this identical model on Google, with a cleaner dial that may have been somewhat restored though the case looks in far worse condition. The numeral style differs with narrow angled numbers instead of the fatter arched style.

 

15318840411_538d2e5957.jpg

 

For a tenner, I think this was a good buy. Of course, now it needs more suitable hands, likely some new parts, and a service. I'm hoping the movement cleans up okay. This might be my first hobby project (outside of weeks of practice on throwaway movements). Parts for this don’t seem to be completely impossible going by Cousins UK which has practically the whole movement listed other than the bridges...

 

If anyone happens to know more about the watch, movement and its dating, would love to know!

Edited by PadraicB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pierce movements are good quality - and some go for very high prices on eBay. As far as being military is concerned, if there are no WD markings on the outer case cover - such as "A.T.P." or "W.W.W." - then it's probably military-style, rather than military. I'll bet it cleans up nicely, whatever!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pierce movements are good quality - and some go for very high prices on eBay. As far as being military is concerned, if there are no WD markings on the outer case cover - such as "A.T.P." or "W.W.W." - then it's probably military-style, rather than military. I'll bet it cleans up nicely, whatever!

 

Definitely military style. It would have been marketed to armed personnel, as the name suggests to paratroopers who feature in the advertising I could locate online, but it's never been issued officially by any military. Don't worry, I knew that before bidding. Though for a tenner, I don't think it would have mattered :P.

 

It occurs to me I clarified that poorly in the opening post... It is important to distinguish between the two.

Edited by PadraicB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...