Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When I've demagnetized a watch, I've done it before taken it appart. One way of knowing if it needs demagnetizing is by using a compass. If it, when placed under the watch and moved away from it, gets oriented/moves towards the watch, then the watch should be demagnetized.

 

The reason to demagnetize the movement when inside the watch and before servicing, is because of:

 

1.- the hairspring is protected since it is held in position so vibrations should not affect it too much.

2.- If there is any debris stuck to the movement, they are released as the watch is demagnetized. Therefore, cleaning is "more" effective. The released particles go with the cleaning. If demagnetized after maintenance they act like sand paper screwing up the parts inside so to speak.

 

Also, when demagnetizing, the hairspring becomes very hot and may loose its temper so some demagnetizing tools are simply too powerfull and should not be used.

 

This is what I've been told by a watchmaker. I always follow this advise and have never had any problems.

 

I bet someone with more experience in the forum can give a better solution.

Posted

I demagnetize before working on a movement as well, for all the reasons Bob has pointed out, plus it protects your tools from getting magnetized as well.

 

I also do it after the watch has been reassembled prior to adjustment\calibrating ... that's my 2 cents worth.

Posted

I demagnetize before working on a movement as well, for all the reasons Bob has pointed out, plus it protects your tools from getting magnetized as well.

 

I also do it after the watch has been reassembled prior to adjustment\calibrating ... that's my 2 cents worth.

 

Agreed! It is very essential to demag after cleaning if you are using a watch cleaning machine with a motor :)

Posted

Good to know that bit Mark, thank you for pointing it out. Do an ultrasonic qualify for after cleaning demagnetizing? Maybe that's an exception? Please, advise and thank you in advance.

Posted

Good to know that bit Mark, thank you for pointing it out. Do an ultrasonic qualify for after cleaning demagnetizing? Maybe that's an exception? Please, advise and thank you in advance.

 

Not entirely sure but I would just make it standard practice to demag after any cleaning cycle no matter what the format :)

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Hi,I went on your message and thought I will buy the dimagitizer it worked on one but not on the other two I put it on the time grapher and it still does not time right and cannot get them right still runs to fast, can I ask what I can do next thank you again for your help.Christopher.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
×
×
  • Create New...