Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This popped up on ebay last week as a £50.00 buy it now

During the Great war the British military had been issuing pocket watches to serving personnel and hadn't supplied wristwatches, these where instead bought mainly by officers privately for use at the front lines with wristwatches improving and the introduction of the water resistant cases, unbreakable crystals and radium dials the Trench watch was born and became an item of necessity for serving personnel.

It wasn't until 1917 that the war department purchased the first batches of wristwatches supplied in two forms the first being a classic trench watch of water resistant case, black dial with radium numerals and unbreakable crystal and the second type being a large cased snap back, black dial with radium numerals all had 15 jewel Swiss movements. These watches where purchased for the purpose of evaluation to assess the usefulness of issuing wristwatches to serving personnel.

IMG_2622.thumb.JPG.a0674d81e384ffec4896adad3b6c135f.JPG

This watch is of the snap back type and has a unusually large for the period 38mm  case made of nickle, the dial is  black enamel with radium numerals.

IMG_2625.thumb.JPG.a572d35a5907a439837f4809754d14d5.JPG

All the snap back models have issue numbers that follow the same form a five digit number beginning with a nine followed by a letter M there is also a Broad arrow mark or Pheon crudely stamped on to the back some watches are stamped with two broad arrow marks that touch at the tip this is thought to indicate that the watch had been withdraw from service.

IMG_2626.thumb.JPG.9eed992c4fb7bec0db4427c42300d914.JPG

The movement in these large snap back models is the same in all known watches where as in the water resistant 1917 watches there is some variation. The movement is a good quality 15 jewel movement and no one has yet been able to identify who manufactured them there are no identifying marks but there is a brevet patent number on the dial side so it may be possible to trace that and establish who made the movements.

No one is sure what branch of the armed forces these snap back watches where issued to but it cant have been to front line personnel because having no water resistance would have rendered them pretty useless in the field, many have speculated that they could have been issued to the flying corps because the design mirrors quite closely the pocket watches already issued to them at the time, these snap back models where only issued in 1917 and withdraw from service shortly after, but the water resistant watch became a regular issue watch there after IMG_2628.thumb.JPG.351ef07a95fe2f8794a765e1b85db90d.JPG

It is however an interesting footnote in the development of the military wristwatch and is amongst the  first officially issued and stamped British military watches of the Great War.

 

Edited by wls1971
  • Like 4
Posted
25 minutes ago, Geo said:

Wis, I think it may be an Electa movement

 I will have to search through my movement catalogues and see if I can get a dial side match on the setting lever bridge I've already tried Bestfit and found no match I shall try and look for a dial side photo of some Gallet Electra movements that will tell me for sure as there are some similarities on the bridges.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Excellent background on this piece of history. Trench watches were truly game changing. That is a great price as well, they are often misadvertised and/or out of my price range.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

  • 3 years later...
Posted
On 11/10/2017 at 4:38 PM, wls1971 said:

This popped up on ebay last week as a £50.00 buy it now

During the Great war the British military had been issuing pocket watches to serving personnel and hadn't supplied wristwatches, these where instead bought mainly by officers privately for use at the front lines with wristwatches improving and the introduction of the water resistant cases, unbreakable crystals and radium dials the Trench watch was born and became an item of necessity for serving personnel.

It wasn't until 1917 that the war department purchased the first batches of wristwatches supplied in two forms the first being a classic trench watch of water resistant case, black dial with radium numerals and unbreakable crystal and the second type being a large cased snap back, black dial with radium numerals all had 15 jewel Swiss movements. These watches where purchased for the purpose of evaluation to assess the usefulness of issuing wristwatches to serving personnel.

IMG_2622.thumb.JPG.a0674d81e384ffec4896adad3b6c135f.JPG

This watch is of the snap back type and has a unusually large for the period 38mm  case made of nickle, the dial is  black enamel with radium numerals.

IMG_2625.thumb.JPG.a572d35a5907a439837f4809754d14d5.JPG

All the snap back models have issue numbers that follow the same form a five digit number beginning with a nine followed by a letter M there is also a Broad arrow mark or Pheon crudely stamped on to the back some watches are stamped with two broad arrow marks that touch at the tip this is thought to indicate that the watch had been withdraw from service.

IMG_2626.thumb.JPG.9eed992c4fb7bec0db4427c42300d914.JPG

The movement in these large snap back models is the same in all known watches where as in the water resistant 1917 watches there is some variation. The movement is a good quality 15 jewel movement and no one has yet been able to identify who manufactured them there are no identifying marks but there is a brevet patent number on the dial side so it may be possible to trace that and establish who made the movements.

No one is sure what branch of the armed forces these snap back watches where issued to but it cant have been to front line personnel because having no water resistance would have rendered them pretty useless in the field, many have speculated that they could have been issued to the flying corps because the design mirrors quite closely the pocket watches already issued to them at the time, these snap back models where only issued in 1917 and withdraw from service shortly after, but the water resistant watch became a regular issue watch there after IMG_2628.thumb.JPG.351ef07a95fe2f8794a765e1b85db90d.JPG

It is however an interesting footnote in the development of the military wristwatch and is amongst the  first officially issued and stamped British military watches of the Great War.

 

Have you got the patent number, I can look it up?

Thanks. Carl.

Posted
On 11/10/2017 at 4:38 PM, wls1971 said:

This popped up on ebay last week as a £50.00 buy it now

During the Great war the British military had been issuing pocket watches to serving personnel and hadn't supplied wristwatches, these where instead bought mainly by officers privately for use at the front lines with wristwatches improving and the introduction of the water resistant cases, unbreakable crystals and radium dials the Trench watch was born and became an item of necessity for serving personnel.

It wasn't until 1917 that the war department purchased the first batches of wristwatches supplied in two forms the first being a classic trench watch of water resistant case, black dial with radium numerals and unbreakable crystal and the second type being a large cased snap back, black dial with radium numerals all had 15 jewel Swiss movements. These watches where purchased for the purpose of evaluation to assess the usefulness of issuing wristwatches to serving personnel.

IMG_2622.thumb.JPG.a0674d81e384ffec4896adad3b6c135f.JPG

This watch is of the snap back type and has a unusually large for the period 38mm  case made of nickle, the dial is  black enamel with radium numerals.

IMG_2625.thumb.JPG.a572d35a5907a439837f4809754d14d5.JPG

All the snap back models have issue numbers that follow the same form a five digit number beginning with a nine followed by a letter M there is also a Broad arrow mark or Pheon crudely stamped on to the back some watches are stamped with two broad arrow marks that touch at the tip this is thought to indicate that the watch had been withdraw from service.

IMG_2626.thumb.JPG.9eed992c4fb7bec0db4427c42300d914.JPG

The movement in these large snap back models is the same in all known watches where as in the water resistant 1917 watches there is some variation. The movement is a good quality 15 jewel movement and no one has yet been able to identify who manufactured them there are no identifying marks but there is a brevet patent number on the dial side so it may be possible to trace that and establish who made the movements.

No one is sure what branch of the armed forces these snap back watches where issued to but it cant have been to front line personnel because having no water resistance would have rendered them pretty useless in the field, many have speculated that they could have been issued to the flying corps because the design mirrors quite closely the pocket watches already issued to them at the time, these snap back models where only issued in 1917 and withdraw from service shortly after, but the water resistant watch became a regular issue watch there after IMG_2628.thumb.JPG.351ef07a95fe2f8794a765e1b85db90d.JPG

It is however an interesting footnote in the development of the military wristwatch and is amongst the  first officially issued and stamped British military watches of the Great War.

 

Also, the watch below has what I am sure is a smaller version of the same movement:

1490203694_s-l1600(8).thumb.jpg.4585e3f590318c02469d26405ebfcb48.jpg

578122050_s-l1600(11).thumb.jpg.8318f375267d09231c76d0ddbc6c3225.jpg

48945608_s-l1600(10).thumb.jpg.cb6b96ccdfca0a67470510b5a0fd8cd7.jpg

 

Posted
58 minutes ago, Penfold said:

Also, the watch below has what I am sure is a smaller version of the same movement:

1490203694_s-l1600(8).thumb.jpg.4585e3f590318c02469d26405ebfcb48.jpg

578122050_s-l1600(11).thumb.jpg.8318f375267d09231c76d0ddbc6c3225.jpg

48945608_s-l1600(10).thumb.jpg.cb6b96ccdfca0a67470510b5a0fd8cd7.jpg

 

This movement is a Fontainemelon but I would have thought if the mystery movement was one it might have been identified. There are so many similarities though I would go with Fontainemelon if I had to choose.

Posted (edited)

I've done a comparison. If you ignore the bridges and plates and look at the screw, pivot and wheel placement from the FHF to the left and then compare to the finish of the wheels and the movement of the FHF to the right it looks like a match to me.

A picture of the dial side would clinch it.

Font-Trench-Pilot.thumb.jpg.71bf778339ffb9f8d6fcb0dc725399e9.jpg

Edited by Penfold

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Does the watchmaker know it's for a screw down crown and not just a standard split stem as the ones in the photo look standard?
    • Thank you very much for this. Re: 1. I've so far found that this one needs something thicker than 2x kitchen foil (another suggestion in that thread)! 2. I've been checking where the roller needs to be in relation to the wheel, the hairspring stud/arm & the pallet fork to try to get it right first time. 3. Does one raise notches at both ends of the tube? 4. What is a "driver roller sharpener"?
    • Hmm, if it is sitting that low I am not sure I would blame end shake (which would be to blame if you turned it DU and the hairspring touched the balance cock). If it is sitting so low that the balance rubs on the pallet bridge I would verify that the balance arms are not dished downward and also that the lower balance jewel doesn't have an issue such as being chipped. Or the balance staff is actually too short, which would have caused your earlier end shake problems too. If you install the pallet bridge without the pallet fork and install the balance, is your free oscillation still good or is it immediately bound up on the pallet bridge? (I have an elgin watch like that where someone in the past ground down the pallet bridge significantly) Yes, you'll need to rotate the hairspring but deal with the pallet bridge interference first.
    • Ok. So given that I had free oscillations DU/DD for roughly the same time, I reassembled with the pallet fork and bridge underneath, and now I can see two more problems.    1. The arms of the balance are nearly flush with the pallet bridge. Bad. I can speculate as to why…the end shake still looks to be too much. Maybe other causes as well? 2. The balance doesn’t spin freely. In the resting position, it looks like the impulse jewel is outside the jaws of the pallet fork. Not by much, but still outside. If it needs be inside in the static position, then I’m guessing I’ll need to rotate my hairspring collet to change orientation by a few degrees.    The journey continues…
    • Ok, that's good to know, thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...