Jump to content

Broken Pinion


Vich

Recommended Posts

Finally got round to taking my Brother in laws Rotary apart to glue all the chapters which had fallen loose back on. Unfortunately when I went to put the very small pointers back on to the chronograph dials I realised that they both still had the ends of the pinions still inside them and I had sheared them off when removing the pointers. The movement is a Miyota and I will get another but anyone know how to get those pinions out of the pointers the hole is smaller than anything I have and there is little or nothing to grip. The pointers themselves are only 3.5 mm. I am starting to think I should just get new pointers.

Cheers Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am having second thoughts about this now.  Looking at the myota 6P50 pictures on the internet there are actually no projecting pinions.  I am now wondering whether there is too much glue on the back of the dial holding it too far away from the movement.

Either that or I am just being cack handed.

 

 

 

post-197-0-23215900-1408128213_thumb.jpg

post-197-0-68663400-1408128237_thumb.jpg

post-197-0-90796700-1408128267_thumb.jpg

post-197-0-58699600-1408128390_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Vic,

 

Are you sure it's a 6P50?  I don't see that movement listed in my list of Miyota Tech Specs, but I may not have a complete listing.

 

I did find this one (PDF Attached), that looks like your movement, the Miyota 6P21, and there are definitely pinions for the hands.

 

I hope this helps mate:

 

Miyota _6P21.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers Lawson,

 

I got the PDF for the 6P50 from the Cousins download site and I have the old one I knacked up which is marked. There are a couple of places that sell them but I am waiting for my preferred supplier to return from holiday as I am not in any rush.

I know now why Mark seems to use two levers instead of the presto style tool.  The pinions are apparently .17mm diameter and I am 16 stone - no contest really.

I had a look at your PDF which is better in layout than the Cousins one and similar enough to verify the problem.

Thanks for the help.

 

Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...