Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'd like to share a couple of watches I recently acquired ......

The first is a 1961 Hamilton T-403 Automatic . I had been on the lookout for this one for quite a while as they don't come up for sale very often . This one may be only the 1st or 2nd I've seen offered .  

It was offered by a professional watchmaker with 25 years at the bench , so the movement has been serviced by him .

 The case is a Gold filled Asymmetric design and I have seen this model referred to as the Shark owing to the fins of the case design .  According to the seller , the watch came to him missing the crown so it has  a generic replacement . The hour and minute hands are original . but the second hand was gold and "all - over wrong " in his words , so he replaced it with a second hand as close as possible to the original  . The acrylic crystal is new . 

The movement is the same as used in Hamilton's Thin-O-Matic models , using a micro rotor for reduced Thickness .

The dial is a gorgeous original finish with , un-noticeable really , a few tiny dots here and there . 

The Watch :

 

59bb510763829_ScreenShot2017-09-14at5_36_04PM.png.a0ebab09b6988e7453d7d94737d91224.png

59bb51265470b_ScreenShot2017-09-14at5_37_49PM.png.973a200279cb276743d28a4789ef44b6.png

59bb513aa1e34_ScreenShot2017-09-14at5_36_29PM.png.5567f6aa362def1330c75292f93ee08f.png

59bb514a0bf66_ScreenShot2017-09-14at5_36_43PM.png.29c5bc43c824b3c9697eb0c466107421.png

 

Next is a beautiful 1965 14K and Stainless Steel Bulova Accutron  214 model watch . 

As soon as I saw it offered  I knew I wanted to claim it , so I upped my Max Bid 3 times .  

It is a 100% original , fully serviced watch that the seller offered as a Solid Yellow 14K  and Stainless 2-tone watch .  I asked the seller why he offered it as 14K solid gold . His response was that the gold on the bezel is 14K solid Gold ,....So I dunno ??

Anyway ,....I had to have this beauty , and luckily for me , the bidding was not heavy .

So here it is....

 

59bb543a8da1d_ScreenShot2017-09-14at5_31_54PM.png.33c2a31a371eacc85bb66d818f2e5e0a.png

59bb544d76cfe_ScreenShot2017-09-14at5_32_21PM.png.f67f31e48ad3186aacb5965471363a5e.png59bb546be9a58_ScreenShot2017-09-14at5_32_31PM.thumb.png.982bb2f144acdcef72877f7258dd6de5.png59bb548080db9_ScreenShot2017-09-14at5_32_55PM.png.09c6455bbcb3d991daccb5979313c14f.png

59bb56c7541d8_ScreenShot2017-09-14at6_26_31PM.png.ebc24036025918a3be5acc063f8de36e.png

59bb56d9babd0_ScreenShot2017-09-14at6_27_03PM.png.0cfcbd2ea7714d019559d655c1d29f23.png

 

 

 

Edited by ricardopalamino
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.  
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
    • @ChrisInOz your not Chris as in Clickspring are you?🤪 looks similar to some solutions I have seen him do.   Tom
    • Potentially not the right place to post this and it's one of those where I'm not looking for a solution but rather thought you'd like to see it... Picked up a sketchy looking 6105-8000 the other day, the dial on which I've never seen the likes of before... The paint has literally solidified and lifted away from the dial in places, I'm some parts completely (and has been touched up with a matte black).  I showed it to someone who works on and has a healthy obsession with these things - they told me they've seen this before on less than a handful of old Seiko dials, and think it's caused by water sitting on the sides and corrosion.  It's quite a mess, but at least most of it is still there! Not sure about that relume either, though I should add I went to this eyes wide open price wise and the rest of the watch is good.  Pics:  
×
×
  • Create New...