Jump to content

Seiko 7s36 to replace 7s26


Spencelayh

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know which parts I would have to change if I was to use a 7s36 instead of a 7s26 and still get the day and date to line up with the crown at 4 o'clock. Day and date wheels only perhaps?
Photo's always good it helps understand the question. You shouldn't have to change anything. Just put the 7s36 in the 7s26 movement ring and a fix dial and everything should line up

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give that a go. I have a 7s26 that needs a new balance but they are about £20 now. I have been watching a new 7s36 which isn't much more!
Thanks
Should be ok. Remember since the introduction of the 7s series. The dial fixes to the movement ring not the movement. Providing you are using the original dial with the original movement ring, there shouldn't be any issues. The movement ring used dictates the crown position. The Seiko is probably the most versatile watch on the market today.
If you are replacing dials there is incompatibility between various versions I think ie..i don't think you can fit a 7s26-A dial into a 7s26-C movement ring.


Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, digginstony said:

The movement ring used dictates the crown position. The Seiko is probably the most versatile watch on the market today.
If you are replacing dials there is incompatibility between various versions I think ie..i don't think you can fit a 7s26-A dial into a 7s26-C movement ring.

Yes, you can because they are the same. And the mov.t ring is the same no matter the crown position, it only changes in two heights. Below a reference that I've prepared with the parts variations between versions.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRN2UULQKTfKmhRStZhDdIOIQrqd6sPB-g6x2SKyQQjOvTBjG_7TQXQhAT4f1WqAX5QAPkIimi-3jqd/pubhtml

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, you can because they are the same. And the mov.t ring is the same no matter the crown position, it only changes in two heights. Below a reference that I've prepared with the parts variations between versions.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRN2UULQKTfKmhRStZhDdIOIQrqd6sPB-g6x2SKyQQjOvTBjG_7TQXQhAT4f1WqAX5QAPkIimi-3jqd/pubhtml
That's really useful info [emoji5]
I was thinking that with the crown position. There must be variants. Where the dial sits.
Some at 3 o'clock most at 3.45. I can't remember seeing additional holes in the ring to allow for this or possibly I wasn't looking ?
Regarding dials I wasn't sure.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, digginstony said:

I was thinking that with the crown position. There must be variants. Where the dial sits.
Some at 3 o'clock most at 3.45. I can't remember seeing additional holes in the ring to allow for this or possibly I wasn't looking ?

The dial is case specific, but always of the same diameter. The ring is the same (except on divers) and is held in position by a small protrusion of the pendant tube. Clever, isn't? 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dial is case specific, but always of the same diameter. The ring is the same (except on divers) and is held in position by a small protrusion of the pendant tube. Clever, isn't? 
Gotcha and yep I think the 7s series is far superior than the earlier models but I'm sure there are plenty on the forum that won't agree

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...