Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just thought I'd share my view on the best watch for a newbie watch enthusiasts to start working on.

 

 

Instead of going for cheapo pin-lever movements, my recommendation would be to start on a hand-wind Vostok or Raketa for the following reasons.

 

1. Designed and constructed using traditional watchmaking concepts. Not much different between the Russian movements and Swiss mechanisms from the 50s-60s.

 

2. While the appearance may be a bit rough compared to swiss machines, they are functionally correct and capable of keeping good time.

 

3. They are cheap and plentiful on the internet in running condition. It is important for a beginner to start with a running watch as if the result of your efforts result in a non-runner you know that you have missed something. If you start start with a non-running watch you may not be able to find anything wrong but the watch may still not run.. leaving you in limbo.

 

4. A lot of them have a hairspring with a Brequet overcoil. Not essential but nice and something you have to pay big bucks for in a Swiss movement.

 

5. A lot of interesting stuff can be had at a low price.

The Vostok 2809 is a nicely finished movement and said to be able to keep Chronometer grade timing. It is also said to be based on a Zenith chronometer but I think this is probably wishful thinking..! It has a fine regulator to boot! If you can find one with Boctok and long word in Russian this is the best one as I understand they have a better balance/hairspring.. the long word is precision in Russian.

The Poljot 3133 is an affordable mech chronograph (based on the Valjoux 7733 but parts not freely interchangeable).

The Poljot 2209 is an interesting hand wind where the wheels have been re-arranged to allow for a thinner movement.

The Poljot 2200 is a super thin movement but rare. I have only seen this on the net.

 

6. No fake stuff.

 

Bad points..

 

a. Cases are usually base metal.. this aesthetically this fails to please me and what is worse they cannot seal well and allow in water and dust.. these factors make these watches an occasional watch rather than a daily beater. The Vostok Amphibias have poor water sealing too. There are a lot of snap-backs too, once the base metal case gets worn the caseback will not 'snap' into place.

 

b. Poor availability of parts.. for wheels and gears you can resort to an 'organ donor' off the bay but for stuff like mainsprings, balance staffs etc you have to look for the handful of guys on the net who sell them. A bit of effort required and usually the watch will not be worth it.

 

c.Shock-protection, where fitted, is not of good quality.. There is one specie of shock protection which looks like an Inca spring but once you release the 'legs' the whole spring just slides out of its slot. If you try to pry it up like you would an Inca it will just fly off...

 

d.Styling is quirky...the simple dress watches are the best. a lot of weird combinations of colours and case style. Fine if you want something to remind you of Soviet memorabilia.

 

e. There seems be variations in the specifications of items like balance staffs. I have seen watches where there is a foil spacer under the balance cock and others without. I don't know if this was to account for production variances or general practise when that particular watch was put together but its something to be aware of when swapping components around.

 

 

 

 

All in all I have found Russian to be good value for money (best bang for the buck so to speak!) and very user friendly. While Seikos and its ilk are not that difficult to start with, the day/date complication and non-hand-winding (Seikos) do not really give you the insight to watchmaking at its most basic level. I appreciate and admire Seikos for their design and efficiency but their movements do not inspire me.

 

Hope this helps some aspiring watchmaker...!

 

Anil

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Posted

Great advice there, Anil. I think Russian watches are quite interesting, and I've owned two Molnija pocket watches in the past. I only own one wrist watch - a Zim - which is cheap and cheerful. The construction is rugged and straightforward. I bought it on a whim and, like many of these things, have got quite attached to it! It has no sophistication whatsoever and will probably be running in 1,000 years's time! I had a Poljot "Shturmanskie" (Aviator) chronograph, the movement of which a - Poljot 3133 - was based on the Valjoux 7733, and I noticed that the various train wheels were of different colours. Your comment on poor availability of parts is spot on. Here's my Zim movement - just for fun:

 

post-64-0-63416600-1407483969_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

..with a Breguet overcoil...! try finding that on an ETA , AS, FHF etc etc.

 

Also note the winding wheel is held by two screws instead of a single left-hand threaded screw...! good quality stuff..

 

Anil

Posted

Nice advice and nice watch. I believe that there is a lot about Russian technology we are unaware of. Strong, no frills stuff that do the job...maybe a bit on the rough side but quite durable and adequate for its job. Beautiful after a fashion.

Posted

Good advice! I would also recommend starting out on any watch with an SeaGull ST36 movement (Chinese ETA 6497/98). These are large caliber movements, easier for the beginner to handle. Also, the movements themselves can be had brand new for roughly $40US- A complete watch made from new parts for $65-$75. Also, Parts are readily available. Better yet, buy a second movement just incase!

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
    • What browser are you using Rich? Fine for me using Chrome 
×
×
  • Create New...