Jump to content

ETA 955 missing parts ? See photos


Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I have a funny feeling I know the answer to this, but need confirmation from some experts before I progress much further.

Back story: I recently took a chance on an unusual quartz divers watch on ebay that 'needed a new battery'. Upon fitting a new battery, the watch was still not working. So I decided to do a bit of investigating as a keen viewer of Mark's Youtube tutorials, I thought I could find out what is really wrong with this watch.

It has an ETA 955 movement, but it seems unusual in that it has both Day and Date. And from what I read, the 955 is a relatively robust and well regarded movement. But looking at online photos, and comparing it to my watch, I think I may have spotted the reason. The bottom of the battery compartment is open. No isolator and no arm to the negative. I initially assumed that the bottom was the contact to negative, but all other photos of this movement I can find show the isolator and contact arm.

So some questions please.

1: Is there actually two parts missing, or is what I have actually OK?

2: Is it repairable? Is the pad and contact something that can be placed in from above, or is it (the movement) likely to be damaged and need replacement?

3: If it needs replacement, are the Day and Date rings going to cause me grief, or are all 955 movements compatible with what I have and it's just a case of swapping over the electrical side?

Your help and assistance (and perhaps encouragement) would be greatly appreciated if I do need to do some work on it.

The watch in question is the centre one, with black PVD body.

Steve

WP_20170315_19_34_34_Pro.thumb.jpg.8b81a5f34d1dfa2b72387f974c2dd596.jpg

DSCN0252.thumb.JPG.849aa1eb76fba3082d4e9e89620e48a6.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The negative connection on the circuit has been snapped off and the isolator is missing.

Easy fix, undo the screws holding circuit board on, replace circuit board and fit a new isolator under connection on new circuit board.

presuming everything else is ok with movement you won't have to remove anything else and can even be done whilst still in its case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not my finest repair, but from the posts above and some time looking at photos online, it was confirmed I was missing the isolator pad and negative contact. I decided to give it a try. For my insulator I used a clear disc of plastic that was part of my watch battery blister pack, cut into the neatest circle I could manage. The contact was a few strands of copper wire coated with solder, one end turned up slightly. Up turned end placed against the contact pad and a two second touch with the soldering iron. Not neat, but it works. Watch now on my wrist. I imagine it will break off at some point, so I will be getting a replacement movement or circuit, but no rush for it now. I'll have a little time wearing the watch before it comes apart again.

 

DSCN0255.thumb.JPG.a3bcc28ed8cd37f31e4107901b70308c.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
×
×
  • Create New...