Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

If you're familiar with the Bidynator movement, I would appreciate your help!

The break spring on my Bidynator looks different than the one in this post:

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f6/felsa-690-auto-mainspring-1021404.html

Mine doesn't have the additional "tongue" (this extra piece of layer) see photo please:

There is a tiny notch where the tongue appears in the other post. So maybe it was there once.

What do you think? Is it missing? Could It work without it ?!?!?

Thanks !

Ron

IMG_20160802_184700_HDR.jpg

Posted

So your photo really isn't doing anything for me as it doesn't look like a mainspring? So looking up the watch you have it's an automatic. The link you had talked about it originally was a two-part mainspring. Today they come as one piece which should work fine, I have several listed below.

MSS-WA40 1.45 x 0.11 x 312
Generale Ressorts  3984-X  1.45  0.11  340  
Zf1044, 1.40 x 10.5 x 0.11 x 350mm

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Felsa_690

 

 
 
Posted

Yes. It consists of a breakspring and a mainspring. Problem is that the inner barrel of that movement is smooth. So I find it hard to believe that it would work with a "one piece" spring. Are you certain?

Posted

Your mainspring barrel wall is supposed to be smooth. So automatic watches require a mainspring that slips it cannot be permanently attached to the mainspring barrel otherwise the automatic will wind up to the end bad things will happen. So to solve that problem the mainspring has to slip. Thoroughly watches the slipping part was a separate spring with a hook that a standard spring would hook to. Then later on they made it all one spring with various ends that slip. So as long as it's a mainspring of the right size for an automatic it should work. Then make sure you use the right type of breaking grease for the barrel.

ms-1.JPG

ms-2.JPG

Posted

I consider this kind of interesting. The bridle must slip at the end of winding, but one should to use braking grease to let it grab at all other time, apparently the two things are contradictory.

Maybe Nomos did the right thing on their latest auto movement, no slipping. The rotor stops when the spring is fully wound.  

Posted

Breaking grease interesting substance. So it needs to hold the end of the mainspring until sufficient forces developed to allow it to slip or bad things will happen in timekeeping but it can't slip prematurely as that's equally bad. Then when it does slip it has to be a very high pressure lubricant so you don't grind the barrel itself.

So I have a link to various types of breaking greases unfortunately it does not talk about applying them as the quantities may be different and how they are applied and how to test that the breaking greases actually working.

Then the video shows what happens if things don't work right. Then when he's examining the barrel wall notice it's not smooth? Like everything else in watchmaking there is lots of different ideas not all mainspring barrels have smooth walls.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KNTrHVD088

http://hiro.alliancehorlogere.com/en/Moebius_8201.html

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 8/6/2016 at 2:24 PM, jdm said:

I consider this kind of interesting. The bridle must slip at the end of winding, but one should to use braking grease to let it grab at all other time, apparently the two things are contradictory.

Maybe Nomos did the right thing on their latest auto movement, no slipping. The rotor stops when the spring is fully wound.  

Nomos I be curious to see an image of how they stop the rotor. It's not entirely a new idea automatic watches have lots of innovative things. For instance LeCoultre 497 Also stops the rotor when it's fully wound. Has an up down indicator so you know if it's wound up as there is no manual way to wind the watch.

Posted
23 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Nomos I be curious to see an image of how they stop the rotor. It's not entirely a new idea automatic watches have lots of innovative things. For instance LeCoultre 497 Also stops the rotor when it's fully wound. Has an up down indicator so you know if it's wound up as there is no manual way to wind the watch.

Maybe (I don't know for sure) they simply count on the fact that the very small torque of the rotor, which is only active for fractions of seconds, can't break the mainspring or any other winding component, which according to them are build with special materials http://www.nomos-glashuette.com/the-movements/automatic/duw-3001/ 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am puzzled by something a snipped out something from your image and what exactly disassemble tell us? my confusion is the symbol for FHF looks like image I have below year symbol as a star and righted this instant are not finding what that means? I suppose we could use the fingerprint system to verify it really is what it claimed to be. Size itself is really interesting there's almost no watches in that particular size. Then were missing details in the photograph above like diameter of movements to verify it really is the size and are missing the setting components.   went to the bestfit book looking at the symbols didn't see it. Look at the link below I did find it back to the bestfit book and yes it really is there https://reference.grail-watch.com/documents/history-of-ebauches-sa/ then bestfit book says lists the size as 10 1/2. one of the problems with vintage watches is finding parts yes a donor watch would be good.
    • Actually, this could be the issue. Drag from the module could be overcoming the cannon pinion. It was definitely not at the point that the driving wheel was loose on the cannon pinion, it took a little bit of effort to rotate it when applying the grease. Maybe I need to look again at applying oil to the pivots.    Yeah, it's very annoying. I don't want to give up on it, so back on with it over again until I catch a break. 
    • The sping is not pushing directly on the cap, but is pushing against the spindle. So, even if the usual black cap is replaced with the micrometer cap, the spindle is still pushed up.
    • But he tells that the micrometer cap doesn't screw into the spindle. How can the spring push the spindle up if there's nothing to grip? There is a screw visible on top of the micrometer cap so should it be able to screw into the spindle? I'm feeling really dumb now. Does anyone manufacture that cap as an aftermarket item? Might be worth investing. Ok so the spindle is different, now I get it.
    • I suppose? If it worked before and it doesn't work now I guess the question would be why does it not work now? That would come back to if you did not have the chronograph module on will it work or is the chronograph module sucking too much power out of the watch basically 99 usually when they go bad you can hold on the tube part and usually just spin the wheel because it has zero holding at all so usually when they go bad they go bad very bad. You should build hotel when you set the watch as to whether it seems to have any friction or not. I'm just wondering if the chronograph module is the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...