Jump to content

Buffing Out An Alaska Medal Case


klinej54

Recommended Posts

Picked up this Alaska Medal case for an early Elgin B. W. Raymond. The case was in fair condition, but I though it would be fun to clean it up a bit. 

I used to do stringed instrument finishes in a former life, so I setup my old polishing wheels and gave it a go.

 

You can see some pitting on the edge of the back closest to you

post-1270-0-68947700-1457787730_thumb.pn

 

Here's my buffing setup. I used my 10 inch (25.5 cm) , double wheels on each end of the arbor. One side is dressed with Menzerna Compound (brown), Item # 3169. The other side has Extra fine (ivory), Item # 3174, although to be honest, I can’t remember the last time I put any of the ivory on the clean wheel.

post-1270-0-98835800-1457787746_thumb.gi

 

The double wheels that make up the course side. 
I know the guy on YouTube makes a big noise about a hard wheel for buffing, but I’m really not trying to push a lot of medal around, so I have good success with this setup. I find you have less heat and cutting with a softer wheel. I have bigger wheels (16 inch) too, but don’t really use them much for this application. Not that they wouldn’t work, they're just really expensive, so I save them for finishes, when someone talks me into doing an instrument repair.

post-1270-0-39975600-1457787755_thumb.gi

 

My motor base RPM is 1725, and I have 2 to 1 reduction ratio on my pulleys, so my finial RPM at the buffing wheel is 850 or so. Any faster than that and the whole system shakes so much it dances across the floor.

post-1270-0-30014800-1457787750_thumb.gi

 

Here’s a link to Steward –McDonald. When I did finishing on a regular bases, I’d by my stuff from them. http://www.stewmac.com/SiteSearch/buffing%20menzerna%20compound.html

post-1270-0-51126000-1457787752.gif

 

Here's the case after buffing but before polishing. You can see the pitting is gone. I'll post another case clean up sometime and use a junkier case so you can really see the difference.

post-1270-0-83955100-1457787738_thumb.gi

Edited by klinej54
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent job, K! I've used Steward –McDonald in the past for different guitar related stuff. I didn't know about their finishing stuff! I'll visit them one more time.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Thanks Bob.  I mostly worked with guitars and mandolins.  I used to do the finishes for a luthier named Gary Zimnicki. Great builder of custom you name it.  Here's a link.  http://www.zimnicki.com/   Now Gary does his own finishing. You can see he uses the same system I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link! The side port concert classical is interesting and yes, he has your same set up.

 

It strikes me that materials for concert classical have change a lot since my time...IMHO, they used to be more of choice woods than now...mahogany was for cheap stuff, etc, never concert (rosewood, yes and spruce or certain cedar variety for the top yes, i.e. Ramirez).

 

A question remains, since he is doing the finishes and is using your same set up, I wonder if his quality would be comparable to yours...it seems to me he copied your technique. All in all, do you have a "recipe" for different watch case materials, (pastes, buffs) i.e. gold plated, gold, silver, silver plated, chrome, stainless steel...well you get my drift! :)

 

Thanks for this interesting topic. I'm already learning quite a bit!

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nickel cases (from which Alaska cases are made) are pretty indestructible, sense you don't need to worry about break-through. That 's way I used a cutting compound and a moderate wheel speed.  Coin silver is also pretty tough.  I use a medium to fine grit compound for gold.  On plated cases I will slow my buffing wheel down to reduce the heat production as well as decrease the risk of breaking through the plating to the base metal.  Using a soft wheel also reduces creating hard spots and break-through.  If I've done some heavy buffing, I'll use a finer compound for a second buffing to clean up any wheel marks before I polish.  

 

Gary uses the same basic instrument finishing process I used, except he has a LPHV (low pressure, high volume) spray gun.  I used a traditional high pressure gun. The color work, wet sanding, and buffing are all the same.We both can do french polish as well.

Edited by klinej54
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks K! Your advise and experience is deeply appreciated and comes in the right time as great help for a project I have.

 

Since I normally work on watches, -- not pocket watches but wrist watches -- I normally use a dremel tool but was finding it a little aggressive for the job (in many cases). I'll probably upgrade my old one for a new variable speed dremel...I also have something that resembles what you have but I suspect it is one of those Chinese low quality ones that if you press a little it stops! No power whatsoever! Therefore the dremel alternative. Also, there is the problem of holding the case properly...I believe I might have to make a fixture for that too.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the guy on YouTube makes a big noise about a hard wheel for buffing, but I’m really not trying to push a lot of medal around, so I have good success with this setup. I find you have less heat and cutting with a softer wheel. I have bigger wheels (16 inch) too, but don’t really use them much for this application. Not that they wouldn’t work, they're just really expensive, so I save them for finishes, when someone talks me into doing an instrument repair.

Very nice setup and results. I have limited success results moving around stainless steel, even buffing regular scratches on a clasp is a challenge.

I use a 2" hard wheel, with grey compounds on a rotary tool with of 5K min speed. Surely that's too fast and the wheel too small?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't work with stainless much in my watch world, as most of my work is on pocket watches.  Nickle and sliver are much softer than SS.  That being said, when I do the math, our wheel surface speeds are about the same.  (The radius of my wheels are about 5 times yours, and your RPM is about 5.5 times faster).  I wonder is torque, or lack thereof, is a factor for you?  Other than the wheel hardness, the big difference here is the motors driving our systems.  I'm have a 1 horse motor, which mean my wheel speed is pretty constant, even under load.  I think a bigger wheel and motor would give you better results, as well as reduce the risk of point loading contact between the wheel and the piece.  If you want the blemish to "flow", you need to heat the area around it as well.  A larger, and subsequently wider, wheel will do that for you.

 

I have a 6 x 1 inch fine deburring wheel I use when I working with knives, (another hobby) which does a good job of cleaning up scratches before I move to my soft wheels. 

Edited by klinej54
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't work with stainless much in my watch world, as most of my work is on pocket watches.  Nickle and sliver are much softer than SS.  That being said, when I do the math, our wheel surface speeds are about the same.  (The radius of my wheels are about 5 times yours, and your RPM is about 5.5 times faster).  I wonder is torque, or lack thereof, is a factor for you?  Other than the wheel hardness, the big difference here is the motors driving our systems.  I'm have a 1 horse motor, which mean my wheel speed is pretty constant, even under load.  I think a bigger wheel and motor would give you better results, as well as reduce the risk of point loading contact between the wheel and the piece.  If you want the blemish to "flow", you need to heat the area around it as well.  A larger, and subsequently wider, wheel will do that for you.

 

I have a 6 x 1 inch fine deburring wheel I use when I working with knives, (another hobby) which does a good job of cleaning up scratches before I move to my soft wheels. 

 

Thanks. The piece gets much heated, but evidently as you say it may be a matter of torque and contact area after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • visually how does the balance wheel look? oh and a note about the amplitude here in the timing machine. For instance the image I snipped out below notice the lines they look? In order for the timing machine to be believed you ideally need to lines they don't have to perfect lines but they should resemble two parallel lines not the snow globe affect as @Neverenoughwatches calls it or like this. Timing machines especially the Chinese one will try really really hard to give you an answer although in this chick a Figure out the rate of all that's why you get the little plus symbols it's out of range or cannot be read at all. But if you have that where we can't figure out what the graphical display is telling us that means the numbers are worthless. So you have to be careful on interpreting timing machines there are definitely some issues going on here. yes the standard operating question of background history. It's always nice to have a starting point did the watch run before it was serviced? then in this particular case it would be followed up with how was the watch serviced and in particular how was it lubricated? usually when you have identical problems you look for the common factor for both of them. So the common factor here would be the watchmaker that would be one thing, and that both watches have. This could imply some sort of procedural thing that you're doing it wrong. Or if you're new to watch repair something that you're not seeing especially related to the balance wheel is a lot of stuff like hairspring position that it's really hard to see. out this is a problem? So hairspring looks reasonably good at least you. I would be concerned about hairsprings that are not flat like isn't touching the balance arm for instance. If you look straight down you're not going to see that you have to look inside ways. Then you want to remove the hairspring to work on it to somehow magically improve it which brings up a couple of problems. We haven't establish that they hairspring is the problem and typically hairsprings out of the watch are just fine the problem is in the watch. It's always best to figure out what the problem is before fixing things.  
    • If it doesn't specify i imagine it will be a standard hole, if its olive then i suspect it will be labelled as such.  Did you say some envelopes have a ' B ' on them. Inspect the 2 types to see the difference 
    • Known as precise but not accurate , hitting the same mark each day just not the accuracy mark.
    • As repairers and enthusiasts, we always want to see the movement or we simply want to figure it out well in advance of the inevitable service that will happen sometime in the future! 😆 We often forget that Sellita's (and ETA's) movements are made in different grades. In an Invicta we can count on their simplest grade, and in Caliber 5 their finest, so your numbers have me a bit puzzled, within spec though. Most important is that it gains or loses roughly the same number of seconds per day. I always get a little concerned when I read comments that disdain and dismiss watches like Tag Heuer's Aquaracer with "the fact that it only has a simple movement from Sellita" when in fact it has a movement of fantastic quality. Well, I felt like a Master Watchmaker and owner of the world! Seriously! Then after six months or so I slowly started to realize I had only scratched the surface. After another six months, I knew for sure I had only scratched the surface. Nevertheless, working on watches is a wonderful way to waste your time! 😉
    • I actually like the look of that one and others I saw on ebay after you mentioned it more than the Russian ones. As mentioned I don't like the Miyota movements (my Japanese wife does insist that they have to be infinitely better than the Chinese ones even the Swiss clones which makes no sense as it is the Miyota design with a single bridge for everything which I disliked) Note I haven't started doing anything with the NH35 as I intend to use it in a watch and I am afraid of breaking it
×
×
  • Create New...