Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Always in love with watches since I was a kid and with fixing things as I grew up.

10 years ago I bought my first mechanical watch, the Invicta Pro Diver 8926. Recently it started not keeping time at all and when I made an attempt to regulating it I messed up the balance spring.

So I decided to go for it and do the following: replace the NH35 movement in it and get the parts to try to fix the original movement. Turns out I should have gone for the balance complete, I just purchased 2 balance wheels. The first one was a disaster, the second one I was able to attach to the stud holder and even install in the watch, but I was definitely doing something wrong as the hairspring got tangled and bent out of place by too much. But by now I know how to install the balance complete. Also decided to change the bezel insert for a green one to freshen it up. But now I'm thinking about either going back to the old danged up insert or keep replacing parts (sapphire glass and another dial, since I lost the "Invicta" letters while cleaning the dial from dust).

The invicta has actually sentimental value due to it having seen me go through shit in my life, I'm never going to part from it. I am just debating whether continue freshing it up or putting it back to it's "original" status with all the scars of the old bezel.

Parallel to that I made a "build" (watch on the right), putting together a NH34, dial, hands and putting it in a case. It was actually my practice watch for the hand setting. The seconds hand was a terrible nightmare, when I finally got to insert it then the watch wouldn't start. Turns out that the paint job was a bit too thick, shaved a lump with a razor blade and it solved it. Installing the invicta hands on the other movement was a walk in the park in comparison, I'm very happy I practiced with an "aliexpress watch" first. But the thing is that I got it down to around 0.5ms beat error and +6 s/d, so I'll probably gift it to a dear friend as a "tool watch don't baby it at all".

Anyhow, cheers to you all!

34o35un45o0f1.jpeg

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well well well It spins absolutely fine?! So I tried putting the train cover on with all wheels, spins fine, one screw in spins fine, two screws in spins fine, last screw in doesnt spin. Frustrating...
    • I've had a look at what I have and compared it to what I can see on a video of the automatic works being dismantled and I'm happy at this stage I'm not missing some part that supposed to slip that I'd overlooked. Everything links as I thought it did.  I suspect we have similar parts lists. Just pictures of the parts with a number beside them. 1520 is, according to Best Fit, a coupling clutch. I suspect the reverser wheels are what it's labelled as 1520. The reason I'm ready to question the complete vallidity of the document is because it has a part numbered 2574 and I'll be damned if I can find that in either Ebauche or Best Fitt (the pdf copies I have anyway).  I think the wheel that connects the automatic works to the barrel should be 1482, the driving gear, it's either that or 1481 which would be the reduction wheel. Have to say: it would be really handy if they did those parts documents as an exploded diagram.  Yup, auto bridge isn't in place yet. But weight turns reverse wheels, reverse wheel turns reduction, turns drive gear which turns ratchet. So the mainspring has to slip, and logically both have to as the inter doesn't, and if they don't the weight can't turn.  The movement is currently in it's holder with face and hands attached so I've examined it while winding. Both ratchet wheels turn happily, the intermediate wheel/ ratchet winding wheel/ idler gear is doing its job. I'll see what happens if I take out that inter wheel and wind it a little later.   
    • Does your parts list actually have the description as mine just shows the parts. Is 1520 the gear that sits in the auto bridge to couple to the barrel. You could try letting the power down and then remove the idler gear between the 2 barrels and see how it winds then. I presume you're doing all this at the moment without the auto bridge in place.
    • I love my brass tweezers and use them for 90% of my work. I like that brass is soft and does not scratch parts and it seems to grip parts better than stainless steel. And brass is also non-magnetic, which really helps when working on quartz movements. However, brass is a little too weak for jobs like pulling back yoke springs. So I thought of upgrading to bronze. But I can't seem to find curved bronze tweezers. And Cousins price for a pair of Bergeon straight bronze tweezers is around £45. A couple of months back I had the idea of swapping out the carbon fibre tips of my tweezers and putting in bronze tips. And that is what I did. I got a piece of 2.0mm bronze sheet from AliExpress and cut out 2 curved tips and replaced the carbon fibre tips. I'll probably thin down the tip further gradually to a point where it still has strength to draw back thick yoke springs. 
    • Ah, well that's a relief, though the parts document does list a 1520 which is a coupling clutch. This threw me for a while (it's a quiet day in the office) until I realised I couldn't see a listing for the reverser wheels. So, we're back to the mainspring should slip in the barrel. It can really only be one of three things (that I'm aware of) mainspring 'coned' and pressing slightly on the lid the kink, close to the  end of the spring, which puts a sort of a self lock grip on the spring and may not allow the spring to release enough there to allow slipping quantity of lubrication, either not enough, or too little Two of those require new mainsprings, which aren't readily available, though I may post a query about alternative mainspring sizes. The third, will more grease or less be required? The word breaking in breaking grease suggests more means more breaking?
×
×
  • Create New...