Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

The battery clamp was defect when i bought it. How can I test if the movement works before I buy a battery clamp?

Can I use a digital multimeter? 

There is reaction when I put the red and black needles on the battery + sign and on the upper end the magnet thing

IMG_20250106_152159874.jpg

IMG_20250106_152220127.jpg

Posted (edited)

Just use a pair of metal tweezers to bridge between the battery and when the clamp connects.

Edit

I'd also look at alternatives before paying the Cartier price for one.

Edited by AndyGSi
Posted
4 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Just use a pair of metal tweezers to bridge between the battery and when the clamp connects.

Edit

I'd also look at alternatives before paying the Cartier price for one.

You mean like this? Nothing happened.

IMG_20250106_204023478.jpg

Posted
12 minutes ago, Khan said:

You mean like this? Nothing happened.

IMG_20250106_204023478.jpg

Yes that's the idea but not sure if you'll need the correct size battery as I don't know if it is just the base that needs the +ve contact.

Have you got any other test equipment apart from a digital multimeter? Ideally it needs to be an analogue one.

Posted
4 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

Yes that's the idea but not sure if you'll need the correct size battery as I don't know if it is just the base that needs the +ve contact.

Have you got any other test equipment apart from a digital multimeter? Ideally it needs to be an analogue one.

I dont have the correct battery in stock, but know from previously it works with smaller battery. I unfortunately dont have analogue instrument. Hmm dont know what to do from here🙉

Posted

I think the Cartier 81 is a 2 hand movement and pulses only once every 20 seconds.

If you don't have any other test equipment, adjust both of hands together, then connect the battery and wait for at least 1 minute and see if the hands moved apart.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Khan said:

Hmm dont know what to do from here

I think all you can do is put it to one side until you've got other test equipment or can find an alternative clamp with the correct battery.

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

I think the Cartier 81 is a 2 hand movement and pulses only once every 20 seconds.

If you don't have any other test equipment, adjust both of hands together, then connect the battery and wait for at least 1 minute and see if the hands moved apart.

Still not working🤐

Posted
7 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

Remove the circuit board and use your DMM to test the coil resistence. It should be around 1 to 3 K.

Why do they have to remove the circuit board to measure the coil?

Posted

Because the contacts are covered by the circuit board. And I wouldn't want to risk breaking the wires by jamming a probe into that little gap.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, HectorLooi said:

Because the contacts are covered by the circuit board. And I wouldn't want to risk breaking the wires by jamming a probe into that little gap.

These are the coil connections.

image.png

Edited by AndyGSi
  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Yes. And you see the 2 thinner than hair wires protected by blobs of epoxy.

I wouldn't go probing anywhere near them.

Yes you have to be careful but that's what they're their for as this example below.

image.thumb.png.20934e16d5c5a4069e0da83cea27dd93.png

Posted
9 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Nah! That's just the manufacturer's ploy to sell more coils. 

We'll that's now I've always measured them and never had a problem.

Posted

Maybe the circuit board is the problem? 

Because I see some wear on that circle to the left from the number in the bottom. 

Should I use the conductive pen here? 

IMG_20250110_214437309.jpg

IMG_20250110_214613098.jpg

And I have also checked the upper to sides of the coil with the digital meter, I guess its ohm to be checked? But no response.

IMG_20250110_222409812.jpg

Posted
20 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

It does look like there's damage to the pad and track next to it but if the coil is open circuit then that's your first fault to resolve.

I bet you are right. On the right end of the coils, I see something irregular as if somebody smashed in a screwdriver. So I believe this is a very costly repair if I ever go on with it. 

IMG_20250110_230737638.jpg

Posted

It's nice to see when the coil is lacquered or resin coated. 

3 minutes ago, Khan said:

I bet you are right. On the right end of the coils, I see something irregular as if somebody smashed in a screwdriver. So I believe this is a very costly repair if I ever go on with it. 

IMG_20250110_230737638.jpg

If the break is near the end then there is a chance to reattach the coil from that point. It will affect the resistance.  I have never repaired one this way but I did have a go at unravelling one end a few years ago. Delicate steady handing cannot be overstated. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...