Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a couple of the ubiquitous 'square' QCMs both of which seem to suffer from intermittent connectivity in terms of the pcb input tabs & the underlying 'spring steel' battery terminals. I've checked both sides are clean but even bending the 'springs' up doesn't get the magnetic cog rotating consistently when pressure is applied to close the contact. Is it the case that these contacts should be just touching the pcb pads rather than being pushed hard against them? I know these movements are cheap but I'd get satisfaction from being able to repair them as this involves learning!

17361037047213105862240190096254.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, dnhb said:

Is it the case that these contacts should be just touching the pcb pads rather than being pushed hard against them?

Can't quite make things out from your photo but I'd expect them to be soldered to the PCB.

Posted

Hi I have found that the contacts just don’t make it so coating the connection on he pcb with solder some times works , and che k the gears/ wheels are clean. If I have one fail I usually take it to bits to find out why, quite often the wheels are brittle and cracked. But as they cost pence it’s only me being curious to see if it can be fixed.

Posted

If space within the clock allows, I would solder 2 wires to the gold contacts and run them outside to a battery holder. 

This way, I can use a C or D size battery and run the clock for years. But remember to use "super heavy duty" batteries and not alkaline batteries. Alkaline batteries produce water when the chemicals inside react to generate electricity, which leads to leakage. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

Hi I have found that the contacts just don’t make it so coating the connection on he pcb with solder some times works , and che k the gears/ wheels are clean. If I have one fail I usually take it to bits to find out why, quite often the wheels are brittle and cracked. But as they cost pence it’s only me being curious to see if it can be fixed.

Thanks for your interest. I'm in the process of trying the solder coating solution albeit soldering is something I've never been good at. Re gears/wheels - these aren't the issue as I'm only looking to get a good rotation on the initial (magnet-base) drive wheel.

1 hour ago, HectorLooi said:

If space within the clock allows, I would solder 2 wires to the gold contacts and run them outside to a battery holder. 

This way, I can use a C or D size battery and run the clock for years. But remember to use "super heavy duty" batteries and not alkaline batteries. Alkaline batteries produce water when the chemicals inside react to generate electricity, which leads to leakage. 

Thank you; I'll give that a go. Battery point noted.

Posted

Try adding a small trace of light oil to the spring contact surfaces.

That can often cure intermittent connections. 

(eg. A small amount on a cloth or cotton bud & scrub the contact surface with it; not enough to creep and affect other parts of the device).

The oil film prevents air getting in to the critical metal-to-metal contact area & causing tarnish or corrosion).

3-in-1 oil is commonly use in electrical repair for this type of problem, also noisy volume control etc.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks to collegues' inputs I've now got one of the 2 problem movements going - the one that had suffered corrosion. Having added some solder to the pads the drive wheel worked but only when the 'plate' was pressed down in a certain way. And the movement stopped when I replaced the back. I employed a YT tip (adding flux to my copper braid) in wicking away most of the solder leaving only a thin coating. However, the problem remained. Checking the drive & 2nd wheels showed that the initial closure - when the solder was raising the 'plate' too much - had bent their plastic upper pivots. Trying to straighten them wasn't successful so I used one of my Temu micro drill bits to widen their upper 'seats' a fraction & this did the trick.

Maybe too much info but I am pleased to have got my friends clock going again and am grateful for you folks' help. Your interest was also a source of motivation.

  • Like 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...