Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I finally finished my 1980 Marlin 81-D and decided to wear it for a few days to see how it performs. My Black Bay Pro is sulking in the watch box.  🙂

I regulated it on my Time Grapher down to +5 SPD-ish after servicing and lubricating. Pretty surprising to me. I hope it will run there or there-abouts but it's going to take a few days wearing it to see.

I have never had a manual wind watch. I have a few automatics so I never had to consider winding the watch regularly. I am wondering if there is a preferred number of winds to wind it in the morning?  I would like give a stable a power availability but not wound fully so as to preserve the mainspring if I can.

 

Warren

20240918_155416.jpg

Posted
9 minutes ago, fclass308 said:

I finally finished my 1980 Marlin 81-D and decided to wear it for a few days to see how it performs. My Black Bay Pro is sulking in the watch box.  🙂

I regulated it on my Time Grapher down to +5 SPD-ish after servicing and lubricating. Pretty surprising to me. I hope it will run there or there-abouts but it's going to take a few days wearing it to see.

I have never had a manual wind watch. I have a few automatics so I never had to consider winding the watch regularly. I am wondering if there is a preferred number of winds to wind it in the morning?  I would like give a stable a power availability but not wound fully so as to preserve the mainspring if I can.

 

Warren

20240918_155416.jpg

Fully wound up would give you better amplitude and timekeeping compared to partially wound.  If i were thinking like you though i would count the turns of the crown through my fingers to achieve fully wound from fully unwound, time the power reserve from full wind and  knock off maybe 6 hours and calculate how many turns you needed for that amount of reserve.  After a few days of trial and error you will conclude the optimum reserve that will give you reliable time, which again for the most reliable is practically fully wound same as your automatics would be at the end of your day.

Posted

 Wind every 12 hrs and up to 90% of full wind each time. That helps keeping power supply a bit more steady,  compared to winding every 24 hrs.

To improve on steadiness of power supply, one can wind three times a day, thats winding every 8 hrs.

Where in Sam's hill ,did a single wind per 24hrs come from. It rather has to do with our mindset,  habbit, but  has no technical significance.

You seek steady rate, keeping power supply steady helps.

Makes sense but us humans are not sensible, just think we are.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Wind every 12 hrs and up to 90% of full wind each time. That helps keeping power supply a bit more steady,  compared to winding every 24 hrs.

I agree with @Neverenoughwatches that a watch should spend most of it's life in the fully/almost-fully wound condition, in this 'zone'  the watch will be working at peak efficiency = accuracy. This is the real reason automatics are more accurate than manual wind, as they keep the spring constantly topped up and working in that highly wound and therefore accurate zone, not because we are too lazy or forgetful to wind them up.

I tend to give my manual watch a full wind in the morning and then top up during the day, while I am in the lift, waiting in line for my coffee, pretending to listen to the wifes day at work etc...

@Nucejoe Just a quick question, how do you know where 90% is so you can stop at 90%?

 

Edited by Waggy
typo
Posted
1 minute ago, Waggy said:

@Nucejoe Just a quick question, how do you know where 90% is so you can stop at 90%?

Following reassembly everybody is anxious to test the watch, guess that be a good chance to wind from zero to full wind , and figure out number of turns to 90% , just to have a figure for long use.

When on wrest,  keeping power supply steady ! helps steady rate. 

A single 100% wind, wont stay 100% all day, thus no steady power, to expect steadiness with other factors.

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, fclass308 said:

There is one on ebay that uses that designation. I'm guessing that's wrong...  🙂

yep, no such thing as 81-D   movement or model.  it might be an ink stamp instead the case back . 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Righty ho, I re-serviced the chrono module and got a reasonable result with minimal loss of amplitude when not running the chrono and about 30 degrees loss when running. Great. The problem is now that the chrono (and movement) stops running after about a minute or so, a tap on the watch starts it running again. No issues with the movement running when the chrono is stopped. Going to service it yet again, obviously some residual issues with friction in the chrono module (Very frustrating - I wish there was some way of testing it as I go!) I also seem to have a problem with the cannon pinion where the movement is running continuously (with the chrono stopped) but it's losing significant time / stopping. This is one of those two piece ETA style with a driving wheel pressed over the cannon pinion, obviously arranged for driving the chrono module. I had no issues with this prior to service and just added a small amount of grease between the driving wheel and the centre cannon pinion as the technical guide required. What's the best way of tightening these up? I would like to replace it but I guess this is going to be hard to find as it is dedicated to the DD chrono movement. 
    • He uses the micrometer cap, but he leaves the spring out (you can see that in the video). If you leave the spring in, the spindle will move up as well (as shown by @Knebo).
    • Seems like he doesn't have the micrometer cap  attached to the spindle so he can only push down but cannot pull up? If the cap screws into the spindle I guess you don't need the spring? I only have a "normal" Seitz so I really have no idea. 
    • Do you have a part number for the bearing shim lock tool?
    • Yes in my opinion the 3/4HP is plenty but it’s your decision & yes it does come with speed control but foot operation so my reason for changing to potentiometer was because my leg shakes so it was like me revving the lathe & anyway I prefer to set the speed. I & a few others that I recommended the motor to run a Pultra 10mm lathe so if you have a 6 or 8mm B & L then it will be plenty, if you have seen any of my videos you will have seen that when using a graver I run quite slow without any problems. Dell
×
×
  • Create New...