Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a couple of automatics with traditional reversers (as opposed to magic lever type automatics) that I am going to service, so I intend to make some Lubeta V105 like suspended lubricant. 

I have seen the oiling instructions from Omega that @JohnR725 has previously posted gives a recipe of 1000ml of benzine (or similar) to 33ml of 9010. Since I am neither a millionaire nor servicing 10,000 watches, I will be making it up with 1ml of 9010 to 30ml of either Naphtha (specifically Shellite as available in Australia) or IPA.

Which would be the best solvent out of the two to use?

Any other tips around making it / using it?

Posted
2 hours ago, rjenkinsgb said:

Naphtha is a better oil solvent than IPA

Then I would definitely agree with the above statement I don't think IPA would be a good solvent at all. Then someone the discussion group somebody was I think complaining that they didn't like this at all. I just don't remember what the something was and then I recently saw another document where there are some additional kind of cautions with the whole thing in other words yes it works but it's not a great replacement for the original would be better to have the original

image.png.36e3bc4ecfe3805b862b543ad15145ba.png

 

Posted
2 hours ago, rjenkinsgb said:

Naphtha is a better oil solvent than IPA, I'd go with that.

I used to make my own with naphtha. The Omega guide just says Benzine - which could mean anything. Wiki :

image.png.0f6417374b13dc122d52b9b142af0082.png

We all know that Naphtha leaves a sticky residure and several times I had watches which were very hard to wind after cleaning and lubricating the reversers. I wonder if the naphtha residue is too sticky?

So I decided to buy some Lubeta V105, and I haven't had any more problems.

4 hours ago, Simeon said:

Since I am neither a millionaire nor servicing 10,000 watches,

You don't need to be either @Simeon, you can buy 10ml bottles for just £10 (at least here in the UK)

image.png.83ddf0d88047cbcc97546df13cdd65a7.png

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I used to make my own with naphtha. The Omega guide just says Benzine - which could mean anything. Wiki :

image.png.0f6417374b13dc122d52b9b142af0082.png

We all know that Naphtha leaves a sticky residure and several times I had watches which were very hard to wind after cleaning and lubricating the reversers. I wonder if the naphtha residue is too sticky?

So I decided to buy some Lubeta V105, and I haven't had any more problems.

You don't need to be either @Simeon, you can buy 10ml bottles for just £10 (at least here in the UK)

image.png.83ddf0d88047cbcc97546df13cdd65a7.png

Actually, ten quid is not too bad - maybe I will just put some on my next Cousin's order. I was thinking about the cost of buying 33ml of 9010!

The Shellite (as opposed to Naphtha, lighter fluid, Coleman fluid etc) doesn't seem to leave a residue. Looking at its constituents on the MSDS, it's not clear what would be a residue. 

Screenshot_2024-08-05-19-05-55-16_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.thumb.jpg.8ac45c0d365fb9885dcedeaa65c10e40.jpg

I use it for cleaning (ultrasonic and pre-cleaning) but I usually use IPA to rinse after the Shellite. 

Thinking about changing my MO to use Essence of Renata for dip type cleaning (balances, shock settings, pallet forks) and maybe use some dedicated watch cleaning solutions available in Australia (that all seem to be Naphtha based) in the Ultrasonic.

59 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Then I would definitely agree with the above statement I don't think IPA would be a good solvent at all. Then someone the discussion group somebody was I think complaining that they didn't like this at all. I just don't remember what the something was and then I recently saw another document where there are some additional kind of cautions with the whole thing in other words yes it works but it's not a great replacement for the original would be better to have the original

image.png.36e3bc4ecfe3805b862b543ad15145ba.png

 

I thought I saw Alex Hamilton make some using IPA on a YouTube video (I could definitely be wrong here). Maybe he used Hexane (which would probably be a better solvent, I just can't get hold of that).

I have seen people just apply a bit of neat 9010 to a few of the rollers, or even leave them un-oiled. Not sure which would be the best compromise if you had no Lubeta type lubricant at all. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Simeon said:

Alex Hamilton

What's interesting with people on YouTube is they do all sorts of interesting things that perhaps the rest of us should not do.

8 hours ago, Simeon said:

I have seen people just apply a bit of neat 9010 to a few of the rollers, or even leave them un-oiled. Not sure which would be the best compromise if you had no Lubeta type lubricant at all.

A lot of it depends upon the particular part. I think when I was in school the instructor would stick a little 9010 down inside. I remember once with an Omega or I cleaned it and did not lubricated at all and it came back. But that was the day of were days of where he could still buy Omega parts I just purchased a brand-new one the problem was solved.

Then I went to work in a shop also in the days where individual shops were authorized service providers and I was looking forward to because he was Omega service provider I went to see the nifty tools for disassembling of the reverser. But he didn't disassemble he used dual lube. Somewhat recently were discussing miracle lube or one step and this is in the same category but it did apply a very thin coating of lubrication to the reverser wheels and apparently worked just fine. He was in a shop that was doing higher and watches and I suspect if it didn't work like the one I did he would hear about it really really fast so obviously it did work. But on the other hand if you can buy a commercial solution in a tiny bottle that's can take a long time to go through which by the way is exactly what were doing where I work there is a tiny bottle of the user for the reverser wheels.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...