Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

So I am very new to watchmaking and I bought the microscopic camera, which can be clamped to the table, and then you connect it to a PC. This in total with the laptop I will connect it to will be around $230 in total.

Here is a photo of the current setup:

image.png.3c9c59543a6a2991d31bbd063fa50c9e.png

 

Now, I saw another option, which is a microscopic camera with a base attached to its built-in screen and it is like $70. So it is comparatively like a third of the price, so I am wondering if that's a better option.

Link: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0CBV43XXR/ref=ox_sc_saved_image_1?smid=A25KB8OA370XBE&psc=1

 

The only downside would be I will not be able to work on the movements directly under it since its base is very small.

My purpose for recording is to have some record of taking movements apart when I get lost while putting them back together.

 

What would be my best option?

 

Thanks!

image.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use a similar setup using a Adonstar microscope from Amazon (similar to your link) removed from it's table mount. I attached it to a microphone boom arm with a 3D printed bracket. It stays above the bench and when I need it to take photos, I pull it down. It makes it easy to document a disassembly. The nice thing about the microphone boom is that it stays where you place it. I also added a light source.

 

Camera.jpg

Bracket.jpg

Microscope_adapter.jpg

Edited by JackH
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe you'll find the consensus around here is that all of those things are stopgaps. It'll allow you to take disassembly photos, but ultimately what you'll need is the ability to actually see what you're doing while you're doing it. Taking photos is important at times, but secondary. Once you get a few under your belt, you don't even bother with disassembly photos unless it's something really complicated, and even then only maybe. The cameras people on here are using are those that either attach to eyepieces or mount on trinocular/simufocal ports on stereomicroscopes. They are a bit more expensive (I think one was identified recently in the neighborhood of $400 with everything you need), but they're universally agreed to be transformative and well worth the cost of entry. To the point that I've heard several watchmakers say they're essential in print here and elsewhere, as well as verbally. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do find it incredibly useful and have occasionally helped others by supplying photos of a movement. It was never meant to work under. It has helped me countless times and most certainly not a "stopgap".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, JackH said:

I use a similar setup using a Adonstar microscope from Amazon (similar to your link) removed from it's table mount. I attached it to a microphone boom arm with a 3D printed bracket. It stays above the bench and when I need it to take photos, I pull it down. It makes it easy to document a disassembly. The nice thing about the microphone boom is that it stays where you place it. I also added a light source.

 

Camera.jpg

Bracket.jpg

Microscope_adapter.jpg

Oh i didnt know that you can remove it from its table mount! Thats incredibly useful, I think that might just be my best option! I have the mount and the lights also, so I might just return the Hayear camera I got and get one with the screen and dismount it from its table and use it on my mount! Thanks!

3 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

I believe you'll find the consensus around here is that all of those things are stopgaps. It'll allow you to take disassembly photos, but ultimately what you'll need is the ability to actually see what you're doing while you're doing it. Taking photos is important at times, but secondary. Once you get a few under your belt, you don't even bother with disassembly photos unless it's something really complicated, and even then only maybe. The cameras people on here are using are those that either attach to eyepieces or mount on trinocular/simufocal ports on stereomicroscopes. They are a bit more expensive (I think one was identified recently in the neighborhood of $400 with everything you need), but they're universally agreed to be transformative and well worth the cost of entry. To the point that I've heard several watchmakers say they're essential in print here and elsewhere, as well as verbally. 

Yes i totally agree, hence I wanted the screen as well, but I just dont like the small bas which I cant do much on other than take a photo... This is why I think @JackH solution is really good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2024 at 7:58 AM, JackH said:

I do find it incredibly useful and have occasionally helped others by supplying photos of a movement. It was never meant to work under. It has helped me countless times and most certainly not a "stopgap".

What are you using for magnification while you work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • £4.04 originally worked out to $5, or thereabouts accounting for currency fluctuations. Inflation calculator from 2020 (when the thread was started, though not when Andy coined the term) says we're looking at $6 currently. What currency is the 6.99 inflation adjusted figure cited in the poll? $6 may still seem restrictive, but don't forget that's part of the point. It's a challenge. Thrill of the hunt and all. Diamonds in the rough. Also, and my personal angle on the game, a fun and inexpensive way to learn watchmaking skills.
    • Dear all My first experience servicing a quartz watch after servicing as an hobby my mechanic watches for many years. This is an old Certina that was given to me by a friend, with  a ETA/ESA 9362 movement. Before service I put a new battery and the watch was working. After servicing the movement stopped working. i understand that there might be a lot of reasons for this (including the fact that I used technics and oils from mechanic movements on this one  ), but at this stage I would only need to check if the electronic module is good. Don't have a quartz tester but only a multimeter. You will see on the photos that the battery contact is broken and needs soldering. With the battery in the movement I can confirm that the electronic module had power (1.57v). Question: what basic tests can I do with a multimeter to confirm that the electronic module is good? how to check if the coil is good and if there is pulse in the electronic module? what contacts should I use to test it? (I saw some videos on you tube but was not able to find the specific test procedures for the ETA 9362). Any information to help me check if the reason for the movement to stop is on the electronic or mechanic part of the watch is much appreciated. Many thanks
    • Dear all My first experience servicing a quartz watch after servicing as an hobby my mechanic watches for many years. This is an old Certina that was given to me by a friend, with  a ETA/ESA 9362 movement. Before service I put a new battery and the watch was working. After servicing the movement stopped working. i understand that there might be a lot of reasons for this (including the fact that I used technics and oils from mechanic movements on this one 😞 ), but at this stage I would only need to check if the electronic module is good. Don't have a quartz tester but only a multimeter. You will see on the photos that the battery contact is broken and needs soldering. With the battery in the movement I can confirm that the electronic module had power (1.57v). Question: what basic tests can I do with a multimeter to confirm that the electronic module is good? how to check if the coil is good and if there is pulse in the electronic module? what contacts should I use to test it? (I saw some videos on you tube but was not able to find the specific test procedures for the ETA 9362). Any information to help me check if the reason for the movement to stop is on the electronic or mechanic part of the watch is much appreciated. Many thanks    
    • I have bought without seeing inside before and have generally been luck Michael. If its a screwback case i seem to allow some leniency on the removal of it, i dont know why because I've never struggled to remove a back with very basic equipment.   If everything is inside them, then once restored and keeping time the oris could be worth 20 -30 each, I've paid a lot more Oris date pointers in the past.
    • I use a nylon bristle from a brush to run around the coils or a thin piece of copper wire, you need .1 - .15mm.
×
×
  • Create New...