Jump to content

Removing crystal with retaining ring from Seiko DX


Recommended Posts

I've never seen this arrangement. Looks like the crystal seals against this steel retaining ring with a gasket, but I don't see how to remove the ring.

I tried pushing on the crystal from the outside, but it didn't budge, and it seems like a bad idea. Prying from the inside with hand levers seems like a bad idea, too.

It seems like it should just fall out, but no such luck.

Before I ruin something, does anyone know the right way to do this?

20240102163651289.thumb.png.e9546c90dd260d7fa9a4bf88fa914f70.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the Seiko casing guide you do just push down on the crystal from the top.

I believe that someone else had the same issue fairly recently so a search may come up with something.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Marc said:

I believe that someone else had the same issue fairly recently so a search may come up with something.

I did give that a go through Google without any luck. Turns out the forum search was the better choice this time and I found the thread.

1 hour ago, Marc said:

According to the Seiko casing guide you do just push down on the crystal from the top.

That was it! It came out with a medium scary POP, but it came out safely.

20240102_180201.thumb.jpg.7a84b1d34c9c2430801861517facee8e.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now I have to find the gaskets. I found a casing guide with the part numbers:

Caseback: FA3100B

Crown & stem: OJ0060B

Glass: 0B3005B

but I haven't been able to find specs on these. I think at least the glass gasket started out as an o-ring, which I have an assortment of. As well as stem o-rings.

Is there a place to cross reference the numbers to dimensions/shapes reliably?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Edit for anyone coming here looking for gasket part numbers for their 6106-5549:

Caseback: FA3100B: square profile, 0.6mm width, 31mm inner diameter.

Crown&stem: DJ0060B: D-shaped profile, 0.8mm thick, 0.6mm ID.

Crystal: OB3005B: O-ring profile, 0.75mm thick, 30.05mm ID.

Found it at Seikoworldtime.com! Wow what a tremendous resource.

image.thumb.png.ab697194502a77a6c9a4a5e03ad6e416.png

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I got the original gaskets, and I can't get the crystal gasket to fit properly.

There's a little ridge around the crystal, but it's not deep enough to hold the o-ring in place, which seems to need a little stretching to fit properly.

20240110_222103.thumb.jpg.76ed64218b09307a0c2cec563db83016.jpg

I'm dying to wear this guy, so I put the flat gasket that came out back on, and it's a perfect fit.

20240110_222223.thumb.jpg.9a1bade4d55d7eaf7ad451f23ea8ac43.jpg

 

And after an embarrassing time assembling the crystal, gasket, and retaining ring in the wrong order, It's back together and running again. What a handsome watch!

Image_20240110_2237531421093674362560263.thumb.jpg.9a9ba01e854f8c38f0d165687a1e0c74.jpg

20240110_225632.thumb.jpg.9fd690d7c6ce3a7e3adef21c0a5e153c.jpg

20240110_225636.thumb.jpg.5f09e0f581f2690cb380d7e9fd67ce07.jpg

You know what...I think I got the caseback and crystal gaskets reversed. That would make so much more sense and I'm an idiot. Back soon.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, definitely got my wires crossed and had it backwards. But that brings up a new issue.

FA3100B is supposed to sit around the ridge on the crystal, but it's too big. It doesn't even fit inside the case.

I measured the crystal, and it's 30mm. What the heck?

20240111193712408.thumb.png.95dca06ff1c3592f34843a15349ccbe7.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

Okay, definitely got my wires crossed and had it backwards

Well, maybe not. The 1978 Seiko casing guide confirms the o-ring is supposed to go under the crystal. But looking at the crystal and caseback (and the crystal gasket that came out) it really should logically be the other way around.

image.png.480f4faa87e08bde9a2098803a048d5e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lots of rust on that hairspring Nev, would you even try to clean it up ?
    • How do you find the working distance from microscope lens to movement? Is it comfortable enough to get tools in?
    • Once you have the collet closer bits off, and the pulley off, there are two nuts on the spindle. These must be removed. There is a large nut in the back of the headstock with two holes, remove this with an appropriate wrench. The front large nut comes off too. The spindle now comes out- but wait- there's more! There is a spacer between the outer races of the bearings; the spindle will almost certainly come out "assembled" with both bearings and this spacer (it can actually come out front or back-ways with the large nuts off the headstock). You have to manage to press out the spindle from the rear bearing, get the spacer off, then remove the front bearing, now you can get to the key.   Imagining you get it all apart without causing any damage to the bearings, now the fun part starts. You must apply preload to the bearings, and this is a very tricky endeavor. Basically once you have the bearings back on, and are in the casting, you snug up the rear nut (one of the two) on the spindle, checking the play of the spindle with at least a 0.002mm reading indicator, until there is zero axial play, then just a little more, then snug up the second nut to lock things in place. Of course snugging up the second nut influences the preload, so you can go back and forth a few times to get it right. Too much preload and bearing life diminishes, too little, and you get poor performance, poor surface finishes, ball skidding, etc.   When I replaced the bearings in one of mine many years ago, I was surprised to find that the bearings were regular deep-groove bearings, but of a higher precision class than normal. I replaced with dimensionally identical angular contact bearings, class P4. In trying to set the preload, I just about lost my mind, so called Barden (the high precision arm of FAG bearing makers, and who made my new ones) and a nice engineer told me that the folks at Leinen were either crazy, or really good- he also said it's 100% A-OK to set up deep groove bearings with preload like this, but best is angular contact. In this bearing setup, the standard way to do it is to have a spacer between the outer races, and another between the inner races. Leinen has the former but not the latter, haha. His advice was to make an inner spacer. The trick is it has to be the exact same length as the outer spacer, within like a micron.  Then you just tighten everything up and the preload is set, because the bearings (the new ones) are ground in a way that they have proper preload in that situation. Easy. Sort of- if you have the means to make the other spacer!   Just to note- Schaublin does the preloading as Leinen did on these on their lathes using angular contact bearings. There is a procedure in the manual, where you tighten the nut until axial play is zero, then a certain number of degrees more. This works on their setup as the nut itself locks without a second nut, and they spent the time to figure it all out in a repeatable way.   I say all this not to scare you off from dismantling your headstock, just to give a heads-up what you're up against to get it back to where it was before.
    • Do, write a nice letter to Santa. I do all disassembly and assembly under the microscope. I consider it a necessity.
×
×
  • Create New...