Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Greetings to everyone, 

 

Recently there was this nice watchmaker festival, and while looking around I stumbled upon this nice little mainspring winding set. The price was right so, I couldn't resist from not buying it. 

On the box and on each tool says Bergeon, and the kit looks like it was never used, some parts even covered grease. Googling did not bring much results, if any at all. 

 

So I'm just wondering, is this a real deal Bergeon winding set, or a modern reproduction of some sort?  Does anyone know?

 

Thank you!

IMG_4635.JPG

Posted

It's 100% Bergeon. Well.... Bergeon had it made. I've owned probably a dozen sets of these, some marked Bergeon, some no name, but clearly from mid 20th century. Identical. There are little nuances, also between Bergeon sets of the same period. Definitely Swiss in any case.

 

The big change on these was when they started making "Nivaflex" sets. The only real difference is instead of a hoky (usually too long) hook, the hook is "internal" to the arbor. Basically machined in, on a spiral, like a real barrel arbor, instead of being whacked in raising metal with a punch. I think it was to accommodate some of the unforgivingness of modern alloy springs being stretched out. Caliber specific winders soon followed, as the trend became to make barrel arbors smaller to allow more spring length, and the old standard winder arbor diameters proved to be too large.

 

I might have this identical set- will check tomorrow when in the shop. I like that a lot of folks back then wrote the date purchased under the lid, I think the set I use most is marked 1943 😮.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, swiss2k said:

Wow. So it's more of a museum piece than an actual tool?

If all the vintage tools that watchmakers are currently using were to disappear because it's a museum piece watch repair would cease to exist. Vintage means nothing to a watchmaker that is a very usable tool.

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

That's my main set, was off on the date a few years. And another set with the same info sheet as OP, I think the quote in German is something like, "if you want good health, don't take pleasure in good things", maybe someone is more fluent here?

 

 

20231124_114336.jpg

20231124_114440.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

That's my main set, was off on the date a few years. And another set with the same info sheet as OP, I think the quote in German is something like, "if you want good health, don't take pleasure in good things", maybe someone is more fluent here?

 

 

20231124_114336.jpg

20231124_114440.jpg

Pretty much correct, according to my German friend. 

Screenshot_20231124_113255_WhatsApp.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

That's my main set, was off on the date a few years. And another set with the same info sheet as OP, I think the quote in German is something like, "if you want good health, don't take pleasure in good things", maybe someone is more fluent here?

 

 

20231124_114336.jpg

20231124_114440.jpg

Who wants good health, should enjoy good things not to much. 😃 

Funny. Tell that to the guys with APs, Rolexs and so on... just kidding))) 

Cool sets btw! Thank you for sharing. 

 

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

If all the vintage tools that watchmakers are currently using were to disappear because it's a museum piece watch repair would cease to exist. Vintage means nothing to a watchmaker that is a very usable tool.

 

Understood. Thank you 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

If all the vintage tools that watchmakers are currently using were to disappear because it's a museum piece watch repair would cease to exist. Vintage means nothing to a watchmaker that is a very usable tool.

 

Seeing as how most of my tools for jeweling and staking were purchased from antiques dealers this is wise…

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, this is on the basis of no epilam. Interestingly, the technical guide calls for using HP1300 instead of grease on a lot of stuff in the keyless works which might indicate an assumption that it had all been treated with epilam.    This, exactly I suppose . Literally trying to get a more, or less, viscous oil by mixing two different oils together. Obviously you would imagine using oils from the same 'family' would make them more compatible.    Actually, I knew this. Everyone seems to use HP1300 to substitute D5 but Moebius actually recommend their HP oils only for jewelled bearings. If it's a brass bushing D5 is best.  Interested what the outcome might be if I used 9020 on the balance/ escape wheel pivots of a typical wristwatch sized movement. The practical consequence of this would be having to service the movement again if it doesn't work but actually the real consequence is that you have bought 2ml of extremely expensive oil that you might not use again. 
    • What size is the movement and have you done the usual search with bestfit. To me it looks like something in the 10 series. The other option would be to measure the staff and try and trace it from their, or at least find an equivalent. Edit Just realised after a bit more digging the manufacturer is marked on the movement 'FREY'  
    • 1mm copper wire can be tapered to fit. Softer than brass but it does work.
    • You would think so.....but maybe not. I did just that with a 50's Oris tank. 5 years ago.....stripped and polished...it hasn't tarnished and looks exactly as it did..I wear it often. Looks like brushed gold plate. 
    • This poor watch now has a new escape wheel jewel. I got a jewel assortment and found one that fitted snugly in the setting, and whose hole was a neat fit on the escape wheel pivot, glued it to the flattened end of a 1mm drill bit and turned it on some brass with diamond lapping paste to give it a taper on one side. I used a sewing needle to gently close the setting over the jewel. It doesn't look too bad in the pic, but actually about the bottom third of the setting has nothing left holding the jewel down and I'm not sure whether it will hold. I'll have to see when I reassemble it. Before I reassemble, I thought I'd better have a look at the balance and check its poise. I put it on a pair of tweezers and found it did indeed want to always stop with the same point uppermost, swinging to and fro around that point. While I was thinking about timing washers and that I don't have the right tool to remove a timing screw, I noticed that one of the pivots didn't look straight. A closer look was called for: The right hand (upper) pivot is definitely bent. So, should I try to straighten it? It is likely to break, I suspect. Am I going to be able to buy a replacement balance staff for a watch more than 100 years old with no movement number? Seems unlikely. I have no lathe so I'm not in a position to make one myself. What are my options?
×
×
  • Create New...