Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My question is in the title: How does the Timegrapher or Vibrograph measure amplitude? Can anyone provide an answer?

 

The frequency of Simple Harmonic Motion does not depend on amplitude. So to first oder everything that can be measured by the Timegrapher is independant of amplitude. Does it use a second-order effect caused by the balance spring to extract the amplitude from the signal and, if so, to to what precision?

 

Or am I missing something simple?

Posted

Thanks Geo for the link. I shall PM Stefan - some time ago read his post.

 

It must be that the angular speed of the roller jewel is measured - this does depend on the amplitude. The speed can be calculated from the time difference between the sounds of roller jewel hitting the fork and the fork hitting the banking pin. But this will only be corrrect if the beat error is zero and the distance from the fork to the banking pin is known to the Timegrapher. Also there will be instrumental measurement errors.

 

I ask all of this because I strongly suspect inaccuracies in the measured values from my generic Timegrapher.

Posted

I remember you saying in the past that you thought there were issues with your machine. I hope Stefan can be of assistance.

Posted

Witschi has technical explanations of how the values are calculated. The amplitude is calculated from the noise of the escape-wheel tooth meeting the locking plane of the pallet-stone and the lever hitting the banking-pin.

 

"To calculate the amplitude, the time between the first pulse and the third pulse of the beat noise is measured.

 

Between these two pulses, the balance wheel rotates a certain angle. This so-called lift angle is determined by the construction of the movement and is entered as a parameter. The larger the amplitude of the balance wheel, the greater is the speed with which it goes through these lift angle and the shorter is the time it needs to traverse this angle.

 

The amplitude can therefore be calculated from the time between the first and the third pulses in the beat noise, taking into account the beat number and the lift angle."

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks, Rob, for this link and technical information - it is exactly what I was looking for.

 

I conclude that my 'Timegrapher' is US. It always displays a beat error of 5.1ms irrespective of the separation of the two plots and the amplitude is another fiction. The timing information is reasonablly good but the rest is trash, presumably because of bad resolution of the individual pulses of the beat signal.

 

Perhaps the mike is faulty?  I shall look at the mike output on my 'scope to check that the three pulses are resolved. But almost certainly I shall be investing in a better instrument.

Posted

I finally got up-to-date on Watch-O-Scope. This may be my salvation as I am awaiting delivery of a Greiner microphone.

 

Many thanks to Geo, Rob and Stefan.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We the human beings never see our self aging.      
    • Hello Tom and welcome to the forum.
    • Hah! Well, California will have to do. Lived in TX for a brief period back in the early 70s, though, so maybe that counts. 🙂 Funny you should mention making vacuum tubes- I've actually tinkered with that! It's REALLY tough to do, and I've never made one more complicated than a simple diode that barely worked, but I have played around at it. But there's just no infrastructure for vacuum tube fabrication. I can get a lathe and learn how to use it to make complex parts, and while it might take a while to learn- and money to get the equipment, of course- it is possible to do more or less "off the shelf". But vacuum tubes, not so much. There are a few folks out there doing some crazy cool work with bespoke tubes, but they have setups that are far beyond what I can manage in my environment and it's mostly stuff they built by hand. I also have been playing with making piezoelectric Rochelle Salt crystals to replace ancient vacuum tube turntable needles- nobody's made those commercially for probably 60 years. I'm a sucker for learning how to do weird things no one does any more so I can make things no one uses work again. (I think this is drifting off the topic of lathes, lol).
    • You shoulda been born in Texas. Tough to make a vacuum tube though. You can substitute with a MOSFET eq ckt I guess. I was playing around making a pinion the other day. More to it than meets the eye.
    • Well, turns out it was a fake bezel! The crystal is domed mineral glass and I was able to find a cheap replacement that should be here in two days.  I used my crappy little press to pop out the cracked crystal, Ill give the case a good cleaning in the meantime and do a once over on the movement.     
×
×
  • Create New...