Jump to content

How Does The Timegrapheror Vibrograph Measure Amplitude?

cdjswiss
 Share

Recommended Posts

cdjswiss WRT Addict

cdjswiss

Posted
Posted

My question is in the title: How does the Timegrapher or Vibrograph measure amplitude? Can anyone provide an answer?

 

The frequency of Simple Harmonic Motion does not depend on amplitude. So to first oder everything that can be measured by the Timegrapher is independant of amplitude. Does it use a second-order effect caused by the balance spring to extract the amplitude from the signal and, if so, to to what precision?

 

Or am I missing something simple?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cdjswiss WRT Addict

cdjswiss

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks Geo for the link. I shall PM Stefan - some time ago read his post.

 

It must be that the angular speed of the roller jewel is measured - this does depend on the amplitude. The speed can be calculated from the time difference between the sounds of roller jewel hitting the fork and the fork hitting the banking pin. But this will only be corrrect if the beat error is zero and the distance from the fork to the banking pin is known to the Timegrapher. Also there will be instrumental measurement errors.

 

I ask all of this because I strongly suspect inaccuracies in the measured values from my generic Timegrapher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rob WRT Addict

Rob

Posted
Posted

Witschi has technical explanations of how the values are calculated. The amplitude is calculated from the noise of the escape-wheel tooth meeting the locking plane of the pallet-stone and the lever hitting the banking-pin.

 

"To calculate the amplitude, the time between the first pulse and the third pulse of the beat noise is measured.

 

Between these two pulses, the balance wheel rotates a certain angle. This so-called lift angle is determined by the construction of the movement and is entered as a parameter. The larger the amplitude of the balance wheel, the greater is the speed with which it goes through these lift angle and the shorter is the time it needs to traverse this angle.

 

The amplitude can therefore be calculated from the time between the first and the third pulses in the beat noise, taking into account the beat number and the lift angle."

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cdjswiss WRT Addict

cdjswiss

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks, Rob, for this link and technical information - it is exactly what I was looking for.

 

I conclude that my 'Timegrapher' is US. It always displays a beat error of 5.1ms irrespective of the separation of the two plots and the amplitude is another fiction. The timing information is reasonablly good but the rest is trash, presumably because of bad resolution of the individual pulses of the beat signal.

 

Perhaps the mike is faulty?  I shall look at the mike output on my 'scope to check that the three pulses are resolved. But almost certainly I shall be investing in a better instrument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Waggy
      Without Our Forum

      By Waggy · Posted

      I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • Neverenoughwatches
      Without Our Forum

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Neverenoughwatches
      Setting lever spring

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • VWatchie
      Without Our Forum

      By VWatchie · Posted

      Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • nickelsilver
      Setting lever spring

      By nickelsilver · Posted

      Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...