Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I've started using a 3" buffing machine to polish crystals (and also vintage fountain pens--my other hobby).  I just started but quite enjoy it.  The guy on Chronoglide recommended using dialux yellow to start removing scratches from crystals and then finishing up with red dialux.  My only issue with this is that the red compound is difficult to remove, more so from the fountain pens than the crystals.  Is there an alternative to the red dialux which is easier to remove after the polishing is completed.  Thank you.  Arron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, arron said:

thank you.  do those come in bar form or are they a powder/paste?  are you suggesting them as a substitute for both compounds i'm currently using or just the red compound.

The 0.5 diamond is a lapping paste, you can go finer than this to 0.25 micron. But different brands can vary in their grit size and not always accurate to how the compound is labelled. So choose a well known brand of quality, i generally just use the grading as a way of chooing a brands finest polishing grit. I find the paste easier applied by hand ( finger )with a piece of fine cloth  for crystal restoration. The polinum comes solid on a stick like the dilux compound so this can be used in the same way to charge your buffing wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The diameter is that of the ring - afaik, will have to look it up. “Wiggle room“ doesn‘t matter as long as the spring length is in the ball park.  Essential sizes of a mainspring are thickness, width and length. Diameter is just a hint if you can push into the barrel directly or will need a winder, it is no property of the spring. Frank
    • Hi @Zendoc, I guess you're like me and you don't have a mainspring winder.  I searched GR mainspring for the AS 1686 mainspring and I now understand your dilemma. The exact one is discontinued. To answer you question more directly, I see two good alternatives for you: a) GR4485 with 1.60 x .10 x 280 x 8.5 ( I guess this one is the one you found): https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/GR4485 OR b) GR4477 with 1.60 x .095 x 320 x 9. https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/gr4477   As you know, the the AS 1686 spring is supposed to be 1.60 x .10 x 300 x 9. - both of the above will fit and you'll manage to insert them from the retention ring without need for a mainspring winder (provided you know how to do it). - GR4485 will give you more power (=higher amplitude), but less power reserve (due to shorter length) than the original. - GR4477 will give you the same power reserve as the original. However, a bit less power.   Personally, I'd take GR4477 for two reasons: 1. Well, the power reserve is better. 2. With modern lubricants and modern mainspring metal alloys, you tend to get a higher amplitude anyways. You'd maybe even end up with too much amplitude (knocking) if you go with the original size and use thin synthetic oils-- see discussion here: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/10580-omega-calt17-help/#comment-248101      
    • Your setup is correct. The smallest diameter of one pulley must correspond with the largest of the other one, else not speed variation. Frank
    • Haven't seen them before. 
×
×
  • Create New...