Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I recently bought a Bergeon Magic Wiper sheet as I grew tired of losing small metal parts, and it paid for itself in the first use.  I was surprised that it actually found the small spring I have been hunting for as I felt the magnet was no stronger than a refrigerator magnet.

The question I have is this... In using the Magic Wiper, you are to use the adhesive to fold it over... I haven't done that yet as I am wondering if this wouldn't benefit from possibly a stronger flexible magnet being attached to it?  I was actually surprised that they sell a Neodymium flexible magnet strip that I could cut to size.  It seems to have good review on Amazon, but you can't always trust that.

Anyhow, I will be using this on carpet (I know, not ideal, but that is what I have to work with), so giving this tool all the advantage is what I am looking to do.  Hopefully those of you who have had more experience with the Magic Wiper can comment on the strength of the magnet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i bought a pack of small neodymium magnets (they come in different strengths and sizes) and fitted them (using their own magnetism) to an old metal letter opener.  I then use this to sweep around the floor (I also have carpeting) and into the nooks and crannies.  I can add or detach individual magnets to adjust strength. You can also sweep your clothing and hair/beard!! 

I have just used it in the garden when repairing some fences to delve through the soil to find the driver bit which went awal.!!

You'll have to demag the part you find by this method before fitting to watch etc.

If non-magnetic or the above fails to find the item, then the old brush and pan to sweep the floor can be very successful.  If item is magnetic then a poke around with the magnet in the sweepings may find it.

After that, it is wrap some gaffa tape round your hand (sticky side out, of course) and roll your way round the floor etc. Then inspect with eyeglass or scope.  Found many a cap jewel this way.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Sadly, I do have carpet, but you've got to work with what you got.  I do have a chair mat to cover part of the carpet at least.  I tried using a stack of neodymium magnets for sweeping the floor, on my hands and knees.  Then I found this rather inexpensive 12" wide magnet at the hardware store.  I haven't lost a part lately, but I expect that it will be better than the stack of magnets.  Plus I can telescope the handle and not have to crawl around on the floor.

https://www.homedepot.com/p/Anvil-Telescopic-Magnetic-Pick-Up-Tool-95212/300998736

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gpraceman said:

Sadly, I do have carpet, but you've got to work with what you got.  I do have a chair mat to cover part of the carpet at least.  I tried using a stack of neodymium magnets for sweeping the floor, on my hands and knees.  Then I found this rather inexpensive 12" wide magnet at the hardware store.  I haven't lost a part lately, but I expect that it will be better than the stack of magnets.  Plus I can telescope the handle and not have to crawl around on the floor.

https://www.homedepot.com/p/Anvil-Telescopic-Magnetic-Pick-Up-Tool-95212/300998736

The good thing about carpet is that the part tends to stay more or less where it lands instead of bouncing over into some hidden corner at the far end of the room. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For me any input from Mark would be great. If he's keeping a close eye i would imagine he has read about our concerns here. But specifically i would like to know if he is ok with us collecting each others contact information for those of us that wish to provide them. 
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Thank you!   Yes I did. I did not notice a difference. Although 9415 is advertised as a thixotropic grease (and I did had high hopes for it), the only advantage at this point I see is that its “easier” to apply than an oil (if one does not use epilame). But this is subjective, I guess. What I did notice though, if you apply a bit too much grease, that definitely slows down the movement. Oil in this case is a bit more forgiving, as its super thin, and it would usually just spread out.  Again, imho.
    • Mark keeps a close eye on his forum. I'm sure if you asked him he will reply, he might not do it right away but you will receive his answer.  
    • I kind of think the same, the surface under the oil is the same as the surface around the oil. Can epilame both repel and attract , that doesn't quite make sense in simple terms, but is it more complicated than that. When cohesive forces within a liquid are stronger than the adhesive forces of a surface then surface tension is high causing the liquid to bead up. So  an applied epilame coating reduces the adhesive force of a surface inhibiting a fluid to wet the surface. So i guess no epilame cannot both repel and attract . If something is keeping the oil in place on top of an epilamed surface then there must be another reason for that.
×
×
  • Create New...