Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I'm trying to remove the back from an old Bentima Star, and can't locate any kind of notch to give even a hint of purchase. However, there does appear to be a 'notch' on the side of the case opposite the winder (see pictures).  Is it possible that the movement should be accessed by prying the case apart here rather than by removing the back?

(Sorry if this is a naive question; as you may have guessed I'm just starting out.)

Any thoughts appreciated

John

IMG_20220712_004514350.jpg

IMG_20220712_004602138.jpg

IMG_20220712_004537114e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I have seen photos with the back removed,

It would be helpful if we could see those pictures.

Then you look at the watch notice how the dial side appears to be larger in diameter than the case back? Then the only way that you can open the case appears to be a notch that would remove the front of the watch. Which means this would be a watch that goes out the front side. Then we just have to determine how the crown comes out if that is the case. Typically there a split stem and they can pull apart but there are some cases where that does not work and you could actually damage the split mechanism. So it's usually best to see if it is or frontloading watch to remove the front and see if there's any way to get the crowd out with its stem first and then you could try pulling it out.

On 3/14/2023 at 5:26 PM, John123 said:

Bentima Star,

Interesting name for googling as I don't even have to specify watch and everything that comes up is for watches. Then I did see pictures with the back off but it appears to be it's in a whole bunch of different kinds of cases. Unfortunately people of taken aback soft don't show the backside just the inside. Someone look like they're probably pry off back's but they're bigger than yours and one of looks like it's definitely a screw off back. Didn't see any case is a part that look like yours I would start by prying the front off and see what that gets you worst case you can always put it back on again.

Seeing as how as I said it appears to be the front is bigger than the back to even if you did take the back off you could never get the movement out if the front is indeed bigger

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I have seen photos with the back removed, so I think Iit must come off. Hopefully someone will be able to tell you for sure. 

 

On 3/15/2023 at 12:26 AM, John123 said:

Hello,

I'm trying to remove the back from an old Bentima Star, and can't locate any kind of notch to give even a hint of purchase. However, there does appear to be a 'notch' on the side of the case opposite the winder (see pictures).  Is it possible that the movement should be accessed by prying the case apart here rather than by removing the back?

(Sorry if this is a naive question; as you may have guessed I'm just starting out.)

Any thoughts appreciated

John

IMG_20220712_004514350.jpg

IMG_20220712_004602138.jpg

IMG_20220712_004537114e.jpg

Eyup John, i have a Bentima star at home. From memory the back does come off as well as the bezel. With the back removed the stem can be released and the movement comes out of the front after removing the two movement securing screws. As JohnR725 says if the dial is bigger than the case back then the movement should come out of the front side.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Richard, John and neverenough for your comments and suggestions, and sorry for the slow reply - life got busy. 

From what you say, and since the watch back has pretty much defeated me, I think I'll have a go at opening the front and see where that gets me.  Will report back with any progress.

Cheers,

John

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...