Jump to content

Focusable eyepieces or not?


Recommended Posts

I am looking at microscopes and have narrowed it down to Amscope SM-4TP or SM-4NTP.  I can barely wrap my head around focal length, FOV and depth of field and would appreciate any assistance.

From what I can discern the 4NTP has focusable eyepieces while the 4TP has an integrated dioptric adjuster.  The 4TP is a little cheaper.  What are the pros and cons of each?  Does it matter for practical watch repair workflow?

Would appreciate any input from owners of these 2 types of microscopes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a great review and hints on the features that are key for watchmaking. I have an Amscope, but wish i had watched this first. I bought directly from the Amscope site as they had a good discount on their site, so worth checking out too.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey waggy that is a good video but I think he gets the magnification wrong.  The objective lens is actually .7x to 4.5x so with 10x eyepieces it is effectively 7x to 45x.

He also doesn't mention focusable eyepieces vs a built in diopter.  Looking at this video and others like it I think where you adjust focus doesn't really matter, but please anyone correct me if I'm mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

9 hours ago, omegahunter said:

I am looking at microscopes and have narrowed it down to Amscope SM-4TP or SM-4NTP.  I can barely wrap my head around focal length, FOV and depth of field and would appreciate any assistance.

From what I can discern the 4NTP has focusable eyepieces while the 4TP has an integrated dioptric adjuster.  The 4TP is a little cheaper.  What are the pros and cons of each?  Does it matter for practical watch repair workflow?

Would appreciate any input from owners of these 2 types of microscopes.

Focal length doesn't super matter for our purposes here. More than anything, it dictates the size of the scope. We're not super sensitive to that parameter. It's used in the SM head to vary the level of magnification, but since the size of the scope is what it is, and it's not extreme in any way, it's moot.

A wider FOV (field of vision) means you can see more at once. That's a good thing. I forget what they call it, but they have microscops with a "superwide field" or something, and that's not something to skip if the cost delta doesn't matter to you (or exists). 

Depth of field is the range of whatever is being magnified that can be in focus at once. With really high levels of magnification, your depth of field becomes zero, and you can only see an area the size of your FOV in a plane. We're not talking about those levels here, but since you're working with three dimensional objects where the point of interest could be some Z distance away from the plane, it's good to have some depth of field. More is better for our purposes.

HOKAY. So. Last and most impactful question in your line of inquiry there: Where does the adjuster go? The difference is just what part the eyepiece adjuster is attached to. It ends up in pretty much the same place either way. It functions pretty much the same either way. The difference is that you pay for it once if it's integrated into the head, and you pay for it with every set of eyepieces if it's not. If you have no intention of ever swapping eyepieces, get whichever is cheaper. If you think you might like some 20X eyepieces for some reason (maybe watchmaking related, may not, I use mine to fix skipping records), the eyepieces are cheaper if you're not also paying for the adjusters. It sounds like in this case, you get a double whammy cost savings in that the integrated adjuster is cheaper, so that's a no-brainer.

I own an SM-4TP, and I shopped around to get the cheapest price on the auxiliary parts between Amscope direct, Amazon, eBay, etc. It's one of those white label Chinese manufacturer things where dozens of outfits are selling the same exact product with a different logo on the sticker. In the junk drawer microscope thread toward the end, I believe someone found a decent model for appreciably cheaper than the AmScope, so it might be worth looking into. I don't recall the exact permutation, but they may have a variety of options if they're still around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Moved in. Now working out the best place to have things so moving around the room makes sense. The wooden movement testing rig may end up being suspended from the roof with some pulleys and ropes that I salvaged from some alfresco blinds that we replaced. I always seem to salvage things from things we scrap thinking, "I have an idea what I can use these for." I hope I'm not the only one that does that. My wife hates me for it. "What are you going to do with all this crap?" Anyway, here you go. If anyone has suggestions for workflow around a room, speak up. All Ideas are appreciated. The bench on wheels will carry either a laptop or my Samsung table for using with the little camera that is on the tripod for photos while dismantling etc. The small bar fridge in the corners going to have water etc in it and I might move the coffee maker from the kitchen out there as I am the only one that uses it. I want to get an ultrasonic cleaner so I may set up some sort of cleaning rig in front of the glass of the sliding door. Where the grandmother clock is currently standing. I'm hoping that I will be able to transition my working area, which is the table that the stool is sitting in front of, fairly easily between clocks and watches. I'll be doing my best to make sure that tools for each are separatedwhen stored. Logistics. I'll have a bit of wall space for being able to hang clocks if I find some that I wish to keep or hopefully at some time to be able to hang customer clocks for monitoring after servicing/repairs. The clock on the left in the blue pillow slip and the grandmother clock are earmarked for  Jarryd and his wife, Sara. He helped me move the benches in today. And then went on to tell me that ticking clocks drive him nuts. Who doesn't like the rhythmic ticking of a clock? I have a green pad for adding to the bench for a working surface. It is not a cutting mat or one of the Bergeon mats. It is actually a green desk writing mat. Was really cheap and will do exactly what I want, I think. I also have to get the sparkies back that put our new stove in to put some power points on the walls behind the benches. Hopefully this is all going to go well. I'm excited about it. It'll beat having to live out in the garage doing it. The other thing I have to do is cut a circle or square of plastic to go over the bouncing watch or clock part black hole in the middle of the floor. I would pretty much guarantee that anything that sproings off the bench would end up going straight down that drain. 😄     
    • So leave off the seconds. Stand the movement on its edge, its the dial edge that rests on the pad ( either rubber or cork , something that wont slip ). Use a finger of your left hand to hold the movement upright,  right hand presses the release and flicks out the stem. I do it this way so i can see what I'm under a microscope. But you could hold the movement between two fingers of your left hand, its the right that has to manipulate the stem out by pushing the release and flicking out the stem with  right ring finger nail. Sounds more complicated than it actually is. I guess you could fix a push pin to something solid, then all you need to do is push the release against the pin, leaving your right hand completely free to pull the stem out.
    • Try putting everything back together and closing the back cover. I think one of the two springs has to contact the metal casing to ground the casing. So when you press the button, it will touch the contact on circuit board and close the circuit.
    • Yes, the seconds hand is the longest and goes almost to the edge of the dial. I can’t quite picture it how you do it on the rubber pad
    • A don't think so it leaked or damaged it because the watch itself works it just the buttons ain't working not connecting with the circuit board have taken more pictures of where the buttons makes contact with the circuit board.
×
×
  • Create New...