Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I worked on my first fusee watch today.  I'm happy to report that I didn't snap the chain.  I'm waiting for some taper pins to come in the mail, whenever the Royal Mail sorts out that malware attack.

But removing the existing taper pins is what really was a pain in the butt.  Some of them had almost nothing to grab onto to remove.  Some were slotted in a way that made it difficult to maneuver my tweezers to grab.  But specifically the fusee cone is what was the most difficult. 

The taper pin that held it together was filed flush on both sides so there was nothing to grab onto.  I ended up finally being able to drive it out using one of my smaller screwdriver blades as a punch, but it was hard to try and keep the thing upright on its edge while I hammered it out.

What are your recommendations for removing taper pins?

IMG_20230205_165712.jpg

Edited by GregG
Posted

I don't suppose the pin in the fusee was copper color?

Then the fruit of the brass pins in the plate I use a 15 a or something equivalent cutting tweezers. I'm not trying to cut the Pin but you can reach in with cutting type tweezers and grab the Pin as long as you're careful you can usually pull the pin out because otherwise as you found trying to pry it out from the backside is very difficult if not impossible sometimes.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I used old tweezers split in half and shaped them to fit so I could get behind the narrow point of the pin and push back. You will find adapting old tools helps a lot when coming across new problems. Fusee pocket watches are for experts in horology certainly when it comes to anything with the escapement.    

  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 2/6/2023 at 11:25 AM, JohnR725 said:

I don't suppose the pin in the fusee was copper color?

Then the fruit of the brass pins in the plate I use a 15 a or something equivalent cutting tweezers. I'm not trying to cut the Pin but you can reach in with cutting type tweezers and grab the Pin as long as you're careful you can usually pull the pin out because otherwise as you found trying to pry it out from the backside is very difficult if not impossible sometimes.

Expand  

Now that you mention it, they did seem to be copper in color.  Though it's hard to tell since they're so dirty.  Some of them were undeniably brass, but this one I could envision being copper.  I will look onto cutting tweezers.  Thank you.

  On 2/6/2023 at 12:01 PM, oldhippy said:

I used old tweezers split in half and shaped them to fit so I could get behind the narrow point of the pin and push back. You will find adapting old tools helps a lot when coming across new problems. Fusee pocket watches are for experts in horology certainly when it comes to anything with the escapement.    

Expand  

We all have to start somewhere! 🙂 

Posted

Agree. What I'm getting a on here I have seem members that have said they opened up there automatic watch and decided to get it going. Reading posts like that makes me cringe because they can't possibly know what they are doing. 

Posted
  On 2/6/2023 at 2:00 PM, GregG said:

copper in color.

Expand  

The reason it's copper color is because it's supposed to be made out of copper.

I'm attaching an image out of  Donald DeCarle's book on practical watch repair.  The pin is supposed to be  copper so it can be driven out as it explains the book. Unfortunately it's not always copper because people don't have the book and it ends up being all sorts of other things.  And sometimes it's barely tapered at all so you have to try both sides to figure out which way it might be to get the thing out..

fusee copper pin.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thank you for the image.  I've had the book for some time now but skipped over the chapter since I hadn't done a fusee watch till just now.  Completely forgot it was in there haha.

Giving something delicate a whack with a hammer seems to be a way to potentially destroy something, so if possible, I'd like to avoid that.  I'm sure I could always rig up something simple to hold the fusee cone while I gently tap it out.

When reassembling, does the taper pin need to be filed flush with the arbor?  Because at least with the one I'm working on, the arbor rests in the pivot, and the area below the shoulder never contacts anything.  So why make it harder for future diassemblies?

Posted
  On 2/6/2023 at 9:49 PM, GregG said:

When reassembling, does the taper pin need to be filed flush with the arbor?

Expand  

I don't think it really matters as long as it doesn't hit anything. It probably doesn't even in real life have to be copper as long as somebody get it back out again some day. Then sometimes even if it doesn't hit it's also recessed which doesn't give you a lot of room for sliding and stuff anyway.

Posted

With some there can be a little grove for the pin, besides you do not want an unsightly  pin to be sticking out, it should also be tidy both ends. After all these years in horology I have never found or learned any tricks when it comes to repairing these pocket watches. 

 

Posted
  On 2/7/2023 at 8:14 AM, oldhippy said:

 besides you do not want an unsightly  pin to be sticking out

 

Expand  

I think those slight imperfections are what give the watch character. 🙂 

Especially on old watches, the hand-engraved stuff connects you with an art spanning hundreds of years.

Posted

You should look at some of the very early pocket watches and clocks. You will see engraved and saw piercing on parts that are not visible to the naked eye. You might ask why did they do such things when you can’t see them. The answer is because they could and they took pride in their work. Unlike to day with mass production and the I don’t give a f**k if it works or not as long as I get my money.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 2/7/2023 at 10:38 PM, oldhippy said:

You might ask why did they do such things when you can’t see them. The answer is because they could and they took pride in their work.

Expand  

This is why have always liked early English watches there always beautiful. Somebody took a lot of time and effort into making something very pretty.

  On 2/7/2023 at 11:01 PM, GregG said:

Ok I think this topic has run its course.

Expand  

I think there's another way that you can do this? Just as you're supposed to give thumbs up for answers you like I think there's some way as the person asking the question you can mark that an answer has been received. But as I never ask questions I don't know how to actually do that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As others have pointed out we discussed this subject in great lengths multiple times on multiple discussion groups. Then we have a subject that has too many variables and generalizations that make all the different things seem like one common removing staffs when it's not. There are variety of balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking or pushing a staff out. Rolex has one that the only way the staff is coming out is by pushing it out enough pressure is applied the river breaks with a very satisfying pop. This is because they hairspring cannot be removed until the staff is pushed out through. Then of course Rolex has a nice set of tools just for this purpose. A variety watch companies like Elgin made a balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking the staff have. For instance that principle is applied with jeweling tool you mention and here's the complete article down below that explains the procedure. Then of course there are variety watch companies Elgin And Hamilton that specifically designed balance staffs designed to be knocked out because the riveting shoulder is supposed to break. That of course would be the original staffs and probably the aftermarket do not have such features.   One of the problems with all of these tools would be the balance staff itself and of course whatever the balance wheel is made of. Personally I like the rule of if you're knocking the staff out and you gently tap with the hammer and it doesn't just pop out then you do not drive it out you do have to use a lathe. Because for variety of reasons staffs that are perhaps over riveted not quite the right size soft balance arms etc. driving a staff out that doesn't really want to come out it's not your best interest to do that.   A variety of American companies used friction fit staffs. For instance here's an example of Waltham Here's something interesting from Hamilton a specific type of 992 with a specific type of hairspring. Normally the Hamilton friction staff's do not have a groove to indicate such. Such as the Hamilton 992B or the Hamilton deck watch but they only have one staff which is friction. This particular staff has been marked because if you read carefully I suspect originally it might not have had a friction staff this was basically an upgrade. I know I've seen in the staffing assortments the blued hubs as a replacement components.    Then I'm attaching a PDF of Hamilton's thoughts on replacing balance staffs. Notice either the hub where the river can be cut away they don't have a preference it's whatever you like. Plus they mention the staff that is designed to break away. Although I have a suspicion you'll probably never see one of those as it would have to be an original staff and I suspect none of the after markets would have that feature. Hamilton technical data number 129 replacement of broken balance staffs.pdf
    • Thanks for shedding light on the exact problem — you're right, it's the centre tube, not the cannon pinion. That was the issue, and after tightening the centre tube, everything now sits correctly. The train bridge can be fully tightened and all the wheels run freely. I haven’t tested the pallet fork yet as I haven’t refitted it, but I’ll be doing that shortly to confirm if the issue is entirely resolved. @Neverenoughwatches Sorry for misusing the term earlier.
    • If the existing spring is 0.06 then it's been replaced at some time in the past and would potentially be too weak for this movement.
    • A quick addition: Given when I measured the springs I got 1.5 x 0.06 I thought I'd figure out how long they are. I was able to do this from a photograph taken immediately above. The program Inkscape has a nice extension that allows measuring the length of a beizer curve, so I drew one along the length of the spring. It's 220mm. And 1.5 x 0.06x 220 x 7.0 does appear in the catalogue. It would also explain the lower amplitude I'm seeing.  Doesn't immediately solve anything, but the information is nice. 
    • That's because it's not a cannon pinion and just a centre tube. If this was the fault I still wouldn't have expected it to run without the balance. Edit @TimepieceTinkerer To clarify. Did you test the train ran smoothly with everything tightened down before fitted the fork and balance?  
×
×
  • Create New...