Jump to content

Anybody print the barrel closer that's floating around the internet?


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

I can't understand why anyone would bother to 3D print this. The Chinese copies are pretty good and cheap. 

I must admit i was thinking the same thing, Gert also. I was going to say great minds think alike but then thought more accurately # thats two skilled repairers and erm ? me #

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I can think of is: they have a 3D printer and they don't have a barrel closing tool and they have spare resin they want to use?

BTW - If you were to use a 45 mm radius and use a depth of 1.3mm at the center things ought to be close enough for gov't work...   🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

Probably not. Because I already have a barrel closer.

Yes but just think if he had 3-D printer and whatever your printing with resin or filament just think of all the different pretty colors you get have. They could start printing them for your friends and relatives and soon the planet would be covered with barrel closers or calibration cubes. Yes some people of 3-D printers like to print calibration cubes just because they want things to be perfect.

Then of course is not just printing the object somebody took time to design the object.  This think a much time that took then they had the printed out and ideally they should a probably printed more than one and two to verify that they worked which may be in this case they did not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Maybe because you don't have a 3-D printer, if you had a 3-D printer would you print one?

 

 

 

yeah pretty much this. He got his 3d resin printer set up finally. he wants to print stuff. he asked me if there's anything he can print for me. This seemed like a good one. It's also just exploring 3d printing tools a bit. I have a few ideas for ones i could model for printing.

Edited by Birbdad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/13/2022 at 9:04 PM, Birbdad said:

he's not sure why but it doesn't appear to have come out the correct size and can't actually close a barrel.

I suppose I have to use a certain degree of interpretation here?

Then regarding the question of why print one when you could purchase one? May be because you already have a 3-D printer and you're curious?

Now what I mean by interpretation? The reference to it doesn't appear to have the right size that's interpretation thing as to what does that mean? On the other hand if you have a 3-D printer becomes quite apparent what that means.

Sizing on 3-D printers is interesting in that it can be calibrated. In other words they have standard objects there are certain size you print the object you measure and then you can adjust your machine will print the exact right size. Typically it's a 20 mm calibration cube. They can make sure everything is size write your filaments flowing at the right rate if you have a filament printer like I do you get all of this dialed in. But typically with filament printers inside holes they end up being slightly smaller but that's fine you can open it with a drill if need be.

Then the other thing of course you do something isn't quite sized right even though you've calibrated you can tell the software that slices the object in other words makes the object ready for the printer to print it slightly bigger which is currently what I'm going to do with the top part as it seems to have an issue.

You notice that there are two 3-D printed barrel closers. The orange one was printed a very very long time ago. The reason I can tell is the first filament I ever purchased for my printer was orange to that would've been a very long time ago. The file came from somebody else who based it on the PDF. Then don't notice it looks nice and shiny and that's because I put it in a lathe and I sanded all the surfaces they look nice and shiny.

So in the orange version the inside whole is quite a bit bigger and the  top part literally falls on there is a lot of clearance basically several millimeters of clearance.

Now what would be in interpretation of a sizing issue well the blue one I printed. Notice how the top part is not down it's been pushed on a little bit but I suspect if I push it down tight it's not coming off and it will be tight. Somebody failed to grasp that items need to have clearance if there is to slide together. So sliding isn't exactly the word I'm using here it requires a little bit of force here in quite a bit more force if you go much farther. Fortunately 3-D printers have a way of sizing things so I'm sizing it just slightly bigger the top part and let's see if it fits better.

Enough for the fun of 3-D printing for the afternoon I changed the lid part sizing from 1 to 1.1 and that made it about the same size as the orange one although the inside hole was still smaller. Then I change the base size to 1.05 which does make it almost the same size as the orange one except of course the whole was much smaller and reasonably sure the inside curvature is still too great don't think it be a good  match probably for a wristwatch barrel advocates to deep but the fun of it I'll take them the work and compare it to the with the one at work and see how they compare.

barrel closer 3-D b.JPG

Darrell closer 3-D a.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

So does anyone have a working 3D model of this tool..... yes I got a 3D printer for Christmas and I have to find things to use it on so I don't get criticised for wanting yet another toy I don't use 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I decided to design and build my own model, link here, made sure it could handle the slimmer types of barrels that the existing one struggles with.

I printed mine in PETG, but no reason PLA/PLA+ wouldn't work as well.

The FreeCAD parametric files and .stl files are attached below in a zip archive, change the .pdf to .zip after you download to access. or you can take the .stl files from printables web site 🙂

PXL_20240124_172648589.thumb.jpg.e54972c8dfe6eaebe75d89731c017c1d.jpg

Barrel_Tool_R2.pdf

 

Edited by Waggy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As always in this game the answer is “it depends “ because the first one worked out ok doesn’t mean all will. A case could be made in a way that it would not really matter much, sounds like your first example. However a case could also be made so that only a tension armoured crystal could be used. Generally you replace like for like to maintain the integrity of the watch.   Tom
    • When can you use a standard crystal to replace one that had a tension ring? The first time I popped a crystal with a tension ring out of a watch I found that I had a suitable sized standard crystal and decided to try that.  It fit nicely and it was hard to see that anything was missing from the watch.  I understand that it probably reduced the water resistance of the watch but since it was an old dress watch it wasn't going for a swim anyway! I have since tried the same thing on another watch and found that the tension ring seemed to have an additional role of holding the dial in place.  With the standard crystal in there the dial and movement falls forward. This means it rattles in the case and falls forward and the hands fowl on the crystal (when the dial is down). Is there a trick I am missing here or does this watch require a special crystal?  I am reluctant to buy an expensive armoured crystal only to find I have the same problem.  
    • So I wrapped the anvil it in bubble wrap and passed ot through the demag only. Still no go—the unit is simply too strong.  next experiment is to use a VARIAC to lower the voltage and see if that reduces the magnetic field. 
    • In this case, the underside of the crystal is flat so I assume I don't have to worry about clearance to the hands. However, perhaps I'm missing something. If so, please let me know. I guess no one has the patience to get into the details of my first post so here's a simplified version of my question: The case diameter for the glass gasket is 36.9mm. However, Cousins doesn't have a glass gasket with that diameter. The closest are 36.8mm and 37.0mm. Would any of those two options work, and if so which one? I have no problem ordering both and testing them, but If someone already knows it is pointless, there's no reason to order. No, I haven't. Is there someone you can recommend? Preferably in Europe. Thanks!
    • No. It's incredibly volatile and evaporates in seconds; there is no way it would last as long as it took to just install the part cleaned in it, in the movement.  
×
×
  • Create New...