Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’m going to have to ream out the mainplate and the bridge and put jewels in.
This is a centre wheel and the pivots are 0.64/0.75mm.
I see one of my options are for the 0.64 a jewel with a hole 0.66, that’s 0.02mm tolerance. I think that should be OK?
The 0.75 my options are 0.76 hole which is only 0.01mm tolerance and 0.78 hole which is 0.03mm tolerance. I’m guessing that the 0.01 could be too tight for a centre wheel and I’d be better off with the 0.03 tolerance?

I’m also thinking of jewelling the barrel but I’m unsure of the tolerances. Plus one side of the barrel arbour is 1.68mm and I could not find any Seitz jewels with that diameter hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it’s not short, the 0.75 is the side the protrudes through the mainplate and the cannon pinion goes on the end.
In this case I can go pivot 0.75 / jewel hole 0.76 and the other side that’s short and goes to the bridge is 0.64 and the closest jewel I can get is 0.66.
Would you be happy with that yourself?

I should add, sweep seconds goes through the short side 0.64/0.66

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By short I mean the distance from pivot to pivot- on watches with center wheel under the barrel this can be very short, and sideshake at the pivots will be amplified at the end of the cannon pinion. In that case I would really look for 0.01mm clearance/shake. If your center wheel is "normal", i.e. above the barrel, the pivot to pivot (shoulder to shoulder) distance should be long enough that the extra 0.01mm shouldn't matter- in either case it should run fine. In the "short" case you might wonder why the minute hand is twice as far from the dial on one side compared to the other!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, from pivot to pivot, now I understand.
Thank you for the explanation, I can order the jewels now.

I presume the same applies to barrel sideshake? 0.01?
I’m thinking of jewelling the barrel too but I’m struggling to find a jewel for 1.68mm diameter arbour. I looked just about everywhere and I cannot find a Seitz jewel of that diameter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...