Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’m going to have to ream out the mainplate and the bridge and put jewels in.
This is a centre wheel and the pivots are 0.64/0.75mm.
I see one of my options are for the 0.64 a jewel with a hole 0.66, that’s 0.02mm tolerance. I think that should be OK?
The 0.75 my options are 0.76 hole which is only 0.01mm tolerance and 0.78 hole which is 0.03mm tolerance. I’m guessing that the 0.01 could be too tight for a centre wheel and I’d be better off with the 0.03 tolerance?

I’m also thinking of jewelling the barrel but I’m unsure of the tolerances. Plus one side of the barrel arbour is 1.68mm and I could not find any Seitz jewels with that diameter hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it’s not short, the 0.75 is the side the protrudes through the mainplate and the cannon pinion goes on the end.
In this case I can go pivot 0.75 / jewel hole 0.76 and the other side that’s short and goes to the bridge is 0.64 and the closest jewel I can get is 0.66.
Would you be happy with that yourself?

I should add, sweep seconds goes through the short side 0.64/0.66

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By short I mean the distance from pivot to pivot- on watches with center wheel under the barrel this can be very short, and sideshake at the pivots will be amplified at the end of the cannon pinion. In that case I would really look for 0.01mm clearance/shake. If your center wheel is "normal", i.e. above the barrel, the pivot to pivot (shoulder to shoulder) distance should be long enough that the extra 0.01mm shouldn't matter- in either case it should run fine. In the "short" case you might wonder why the minute hand is twice as far from the dial on one side compared to the other!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, from pivot to pivot, now I understand.
Thank you for the explanation, I can order the jewels now.

I presume the same applies to barrel sideshake? 0.01?
I’m thinking of jewelling the barrel too but I’m struggling to find a jewel for 1.68mm diameter arbour. I looked just about everywhere and I cannot find a Seitz jewel of that diameter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all depends how much you're willing to spend and if you're happy to try the old mainspring and see what results you get with the possibility of having to swap it at a later stage. The key sizes are the height and thickness with some flexibility on the length depending on the barrel size. If you look at the likes of Cousins for springs around the GR4486 Edit There are still some GR4486 out their. https://www.ebay.com/itm/126715574424?ff3=2&toolid=10044&customid=&lgeo=1&vectorid=229508&item=126715574424&ufes_redirect=true
    • Older mainsprings look like that. The S shaped mainspring is a modern invention that is, as far as I know, better at providing the same torque across all states of wind. By modern I mean 1950-ish (someone will correct me on that I'm sure). Your old spring looks ok to my eyes: no kinks, healthy space between the coils. I'd just put it back, though others might replace it.
    • Hi All! I have an ST1686 that I am tearing down and rebuilding for my first service.  I got down to the mainspring barrel and opened it.  It was pretty dirty, so I unwound it to clean.  But it didn't look like a mainspring typically would like this stock mainspring photo from Wikipedia.  It was only spiral coiled and didn't flatten out.  I've attached a photo to accompany my poor rookie explanation. If this is abnormal, I'll need to source a replacement.  I see that the ST1686 takes a GR4486, but the GR4486 is discontinued.  I'm able to source a new old stock (NOS) spring on eBay, but what would be a good modern alternative to the GR4486 1.60mm high x .10mm thick x 300mm long x 9mm barrel diameter?  Do I look for slightly longer spring? Thinner spring?  Thicker spring?  I know the height and barrel diameter should probably need to stay the same, right? As far as the barrel goes, how do you tell the difference between the machined ridge to hold the end of the mainspring and a broken piece of mainspring that's stuck inside of the barrel?  I've attached photos of the end of the mainspring and the inside of the barrel.  I appreciate the help since I have no bearing for what "normal" looks like. Thanks for the help in advance! Dave
    • This is a very old thread and as stated by @tomh207 above it's unlikely you'll get a response.
    • Make sure you check the auto rotor bearing before you disassemble so you know it's OK. There are a couple of options for the mainspring from Cousins compared to the stupid eBay prices.
×
×
  • Create New...