Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A lot of the advice around the forum when diagnosing low amplitude is to check the sideshake and endshake and re-bush or jewel as necessary.  I learned from the previous topic I made that sideshake should be around 0.02mm for the gear train.  And while I know this number, I do not know how that correlates to the real world.  I obviously can't stick a caliper or micrometer into the pivot hole, so that means I'll have to know what it is by feel and by appearance, but this I am not sure of.  Can someone give some insight on how to do this?

Another practical question is that if a pivot hole is worn to the point where its oblong and needs to be staked and broached, where in the hole do you do that? Even if you manage to close the hole up enough, you'd have to ream/broach exactly over the center of the original hole, not the center of the new smaller hole, since the center of the new hole is still not where the original center was.  Kind of hard to describe this without pictures, so let me know if you need clarification.

Posted
30 minutes ago, GregG said:

Can someone give some insight on how to do this?

There is a rule of thumb for this which is that with everything dismantled, stand the wheel in question upright in it's pivot hole and observe how far it is able to lean from the vertical. Ideally you are looking for about 5 degrees of lean.

Now although you can't put a protractor into the system to measure this, you can draw two lines on a piece of paper that intersect at 5 degrees to give yourself a bench mark with which to compare. Believe it or not the human eye is usually pretty good at comparing angles.

  • Like 3
Posted

Its like you say a feel. This guy shows the end shake on an escape wheel. I call this amount excessive. The reason is;    you want pallets interface level with escape teeth/ wheel and the shown amount of end shake when combined/ added to end shake on fork arbour might not give you the level interface you desire. 

For side shake, I grab the arbour in tweezers and feel the side shake. You will get the " feel"  by experience, you can also observe the pivot's shake in the hole under high magnification. 

 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Its like you say a feel. This guy shows the end shake on an escape wheel. I call this amount excessive. The reason is;    you want pallets interface level with escape teeth/ wheel and the shown amount of end shake when combined/ added to end shake on fork arbour might not give you the level interface you desire. 

For side shake, I grab the arbour in tweezers and feel the side shake. You will get the " feel"  by experience, you can also observe the pivot's shake in the hole under high magnification. 

 

Thanks joe, but how do I correlate a feel with too much or too little sideshake?  If I have one pivot that shakes x amount, and another pivot that shakes a tiny bit more, how do I know if the first is good and second is bad, or if both are good, or if both are bad?

With endshake, I can imagine it would be easier to determine.  If the teeth of one gear interact with the teeth of another gear, you would not want the endshakes to be so loose as to possible cause those two to loose their meshing, correct?  Or in the case of the video, ideally the escape teeth and the pallet jewels would be at the same level.  But if the endshakes are too loose, theoretically the jewels might just barely be catching on the escape teeth.

Edited by GregG

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...