Jump to content

Seiko 6106-7729 Service


Recommended Posts

I'm not highly experienced and I didn't photograph this service enough to give a walkthrough and it was a straightforward thing, going smoothly for the most part. I just wanted to share the only glitch that I got on this one.

I used a K&D mainspring winder and I made the mistake of rotating it the wrong way for just a couple of rotations. I then rotated the right way and went all the way through the process and loaded it into a barrel. Once I pulled it away, I saw that the loop end of the MS was completely kinked, folded over on itself. I imagine that rotating the wrong way caused the loop end to fold in under itself and then winding it up in the winder smashed it home. Of course, trying to bend it back caused it to break. I am guessing this could happen with any winder and nothing against the K&D.

This picture is before that happened, after cleaning everything:

1450968564_SeikoDX6106-7729.thumb.jpg.dc5f389d8c4b97225c98b8ebfd6f2b44.jpg

In this photo is the MS that I broke. I had another laying around and used it instead. I couldn't remember where it came from, but I think it was an older one that I had re-loaded into a washer. I just grabbed it and threw it in, but in hindsight, I should have unloaded it and checked it for shape and hygiene before reloading it.

You can see from the time graph that the amplitude is on the low side.

1723369565_SeikoDX6106-7729(1).thumb.jpg.7054cd4077d4ffc8467ab1049f416591.jpg

It drops down to 175º in some positions. But otherwise, it is running well. I think it would be best to replace the mainspring. It will be interesting to see the difference in this amplitude with only that difference. If I do and see a noticeable difference, I'll come back here and update the post.

Here's the completed watch, which also needed considerable case work, done a few days ago. What looks like an anomaly on the pic is actually refraction caused by the faceted crystal.

From 1975, the Seiko 6106-7729:

621117347_SeikoDX6106-7729(2).thumb.jpeg.a2898f120fd62b57f850717d223f50c8.jpeg

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kalanag said:

Well done! Thanks for sharing mistakes also. That‘s how we all learn.

I read recently that Seikos are low on amplitude. Please let us know whether a new mainspring makes a difference. I‘m not so sure…

If I shared all of my mistakes I’d be the most frequent poster on this board! Yes, Seikos are low but they should be 220-250. I serviced another a week ago and got 260 with a brand new mainspring. For sure I will come back here when I get around to replacing this one in a couple weeks or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kalanag said:

But I couldn‘t get them above 240° (lift angle is 46°). Seems to be normal…

Surely normal. But even a larger Seiko with "just" 210 deg amplitude can have a perfect pattern, sufficient positonal deviation, and more importantly, excellent timekeeping. In the end, that's all what matters.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have ended up becoming close to a watchmaker near me as he has serviced 5 of my watches now and we have had a few conversations. He is a formally-trained watchmaker from Paris and has been in the business his whole life (he is about my age, near 60). He is not a fan of Seiko and admittedly a bit of a Swiss watch snob but he said that anything over 180º is nothing to worry about and there is such a thing as too high an amplitude. 

17 minutes ago, jdm said:

Surely normal. But even a larger Seiko with "just" 210 deg amplitude can have a perfect pattern, sufficient positonal deviation, and more importantly, excellent timekeeping. In the end, that's all what matters.

I agree with this. If the watch is running fine, that's what matters. But I think each watch design has a range that is optimal for it and when we service a watch, we want it to fall into the expected range. As a newb, I don't know what to expect really, but I have serviced a half dozen movements based on the 6106 caliber or similar to it over the last couple of months. I have seen anywhere from 180 to 260 degrees of amplitude so it is hard to say where it should be. I've seen this with existing and new mainsprings also. I suspect there are many factors that determine the amplitude and one of them is the mainspring condition and perhaps that is not the key factor either. I'm sure the balance has more to do with it. Even two watches of the same caliber will behave differently because they have seen different circumstances. All we know is what a timegrapher tells us, and we all probably put too much stock in what the timegrapher tells us. Our wrist, over time, tells us much more.

I have ordered a new mainspring so it will be interesting to see what happens when that will be the only change I make to this watch. Stay tuned.

Edited by Saldog
typo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued. They except to get stem in stock for cal. K916 but will that work? Or Is there a way out to join the ends?
    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...