Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm not highly experienced and I didn't photograph this service enough to give a walkthrough and it was a straightforward thing, going smoothly for the most part. I just wanted to share the only glitch that I got on this one.

I used a K&D mainspring winder and I made the mistake of rotating it the wrong way for just a couple of rotations. I then rotated the right way and went all the way through the process and loaded it into a barrel. Once I pulled it away, I saw that the loop end of the MS was completely kinked, folded over on itself. I imagine that rotating the wrong way caused the loop end to fold in under itself and then winding it up in the winder smashed it home. Of course, trying to bend it back caused it to break. I am guessing this could happen with any winder and nothing against the K&D.

This picture is before that happened, after cleaning everything:

1450968564_SeikoDX6106-7729.thumb.jpg.dc5f389d8c4b97225c98b8ebfd6f2b44.jpg

In this photo is the MS that I broke. I had another laying around and used it instead. I couldn't remember where it came from, but I think it was an older one that I had re-loaded into a washer. I just grabbed it and threw it in, but in hindsight, I should have unloaded it and checked it for shape and hygiene before reloading it.

You can see from the time graph that the amplitude is on the low side.

1723369565_SeikoDX6106-7729(1).thumb.jpg.7054cd4077d4ffc8467ab1049f416591.jpg

It drops down to 175º in some positions. But otherwise, it is running well. I think it would be best to replace the mainspring. It will be interesting to see the difference in this amplitude with only that difference. If I do and see a noticeable difference, I'll come back here and update the post.

Here's the completed watch, which also needed considerable case work, done a few days ago. What looks like an anomaly on the pic is actually refraction caused by the faceted crystal.

From 1975, the Seiko 6106-7729:

621117347_SeikoDX6106-7729(2).thumb.jpeg.a2898f120fd62b57f850717d223f50c8.jpeg

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Well done! Thanks for sharing mistakes also. That‘s how we all learn.

I read recently that Seikos are low on amplitude. Please let us know whether a new mainspring makes a difference. I‘m not so sure…

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Kalanag said:

Well done! Thanks for sharing mistakes also. That‘s how we all learn.

I read recently that Seikos are low on amplitude. Please let us know whether a new mainspring makes a difference. I‘m not so sure…

If I shared all of my mistakes I’d be the most frequent poster on this board! Yes, Seikos are low but they should be 220-250. I serviced another a week ago and got 260 with a brand new mainspring. For sure I will come back here when I get around to replacing this one in a couple weeks or so. 

Posted

I serviced two identical Citizen ladies watches (caliber 6900) which were in very good condition. But I couldn‘t get them above 240° (lift angle is 46°). Seems to be normal…

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, Kalanag said:

But I couldn‘t get them above 240° (lift angle is 46°). Seems to be normal…

Surely normal. But even a larger Seiko with "just" 210 deg amplitude can have a perfect pattern, sufficient positonal deviation, and more importantly, excellent timekeeping. In the end, that's all what matters.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

I have ended up becoming close to a watchmaker near me as he has serviced 5 of my watches now and we have had a few conversations. He is a formally-trained watchmaker from Paris and has been in the business his whole life (he is about my age, near 60). He is not a fan of Seiko and admittedly a bit of a Swiss watch snob but he said that anything over 180º is nothing to worry about and there is such a thing as too high an amplitude. 

17 minutes ago, jdm said:

Surely normal. But even a larger Seiko with "just" 210 deg amplitude can have a perfect pattern, sufficient positonal deviation, and more importantly, excellent timekeeping. In the end, that's all what matters.

I agree with this. If the watch is running fine, that's what matters. But I think each watch design has a range that is optimal for it and when we service a watch, we want it to fall into the expected range. As a newb, I don't know what to expect really, but I have serviced a half dozen movements based on the 6106 caliber or similar to it over the last couple of months. I have seen anywhere from 180 to 260 degrees of amplitude so it is hard to say where it should be. I've seen this with existing and new mainsprings also. I suspect there are many factors that determine the amplitude and one of them is the mainspring condition and perhaps that is not the key factor either. I'm sure the balance has more to do with it. Even two watches of the same caliber will behave differently because they have seen different circumstances. All we know is what a timegrapher tells us, and we all probably put too much stock in what the timegrapher tells us. Our wrist, over time, tells us much more.

I have ordered a new mainspring so it will be interesting to see what happens when that will be the only change I make to this watch. Stay tuned.

Edited by Saldog
typo
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...