Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a gts Wittnauer wristwatch 76/3G I have overhauled.  When the movement is out of the case or only in the case back, the regulation is normal and adjustable.  Currently -4 to 5 sec/day.  Once I put the upper case on the movement and check regulation, the watch appears as though it is magnetized.   I have demagnetized the movement, case back and separately, the upper case.  No impact on the regulation behavior.  If I set the watch with a digital clock, the watch, when fully cased, will gain a couple minutes in an hour.

Hands seem to be clear of crystal, hairspring is not sticking or touching anything, the top and bottom of the case is assembled with normal pressure.  Any thoughts on what is going on??

 

IMG_0352.jpeg

IMG_0351.jpeg

IMG_0353.jpeg

Posted

Have you checked if the movement out of the case gain a couple of minutes an hour too ?

I wonder if it's incorrect timegrapher readings causing confusion - the top pic shows 2.4 ms beat error, the bottom 0.4 ms. Why? Maybe just a weak sound when cased.

It's best to put the crown against the metal bit of the timegrapher, especially when cased, as it gives a stronger signal (The crown connected to the mainplate transmits the sound better than through the case).

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Mystery solved.  Turns out that the caseback inside wall was tapered at the edge by design and was coming in contact with the hairspring stud screw head.  I forgot to mention that I did install a balance complete.  The new hspg stud must not have allowed the stud screw to thread in as far as the prior stud did.   Also, I noticed when I uncased the movement and placed it back on the timer, I would see a gradual increase in timing indicating that things were running very slow when cased (binding taking place).  I don't know how that would result in the watch gaining time though?

I ended up giving the case back a few small hammer taps to a round nose staking tool which provided enough tolerance for the hairspring stud screw head to not touch.

Thanks for the look.

IMG_0354.jpeg

Edited by GeorgeC
  • Like 2
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...