Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all!

I’ve just disassembled my first watch - a cheap eta clone. 
it was actually running really well (+10 seconds), but I did buy the movement to practice so I pulled it apart, cleaned it, and discovered this brown rust-like colouring on the pallet fork. 
Is this normal? I’m hoping it isn’t rust! 

407F6C54-1C5F-4D4E-83B1-D7B0E014DAA9.jpeg

Posted

That's shellac. It's used an adhesive to set the pallet jewels in position. That's perfectly normal.

The colour of the shellac can vary from a very light blonde to a very dark brunette.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

That's shellac. It's used an adhesive to set the pallet jewels in position. That's perfectly normal.

The colour of the shellac can vary from a very light blonde to a very dark brunette.

 

7 minutes ago, grsnovi said:

Shellac has been used for years and its origin might surprise you. Wikipedia is your friend.

Thanks so much for confirming! Huge relief, I thought I stuffed it up when I ran it through a clean!

im hoping to get a microscope plugged in tomorrow so I’ll be able to have better photos .

 

Thanks again!

Posted
56 minutes ago, Watchscience said:

Hi all!

I’ve just disassembled my first watch - a cheap eta clone. 
it was actually running really well (+10 seconds), but I did buy the movement to practice so I pulled it apart, cleaned it, and discovered this brown rust-like colouring on the pallet fork. 
Is this normal? I’m hoping it isn’t rust! 

407F6C54-1C5F-4D4E-83B1-D7B0E014DAA9.jpeg

Hi ws . It has been used traditionally since the use of low friction synthetic rubies in the escapement.  You will also find it used to set the impulse jewel in place on the roller table of the balance assembly. Be careful with cleaning of these parts , ipa solvent can have a tendency to soften the schellac if left exposed to it for too long. Introducing heat to these areas softens the shellac should the jewels need to be reset.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Hi ws . It has been used traditionally since the use of low friction synthetic rubies in the escapement.  You will also find it used to set the impulse jewel in place on the roller table of the balance assembly. Be careful with cleaning of these parts , ipa solvent can have a tendency to soften the schellac if left exposed to it for too long. Introducing heat to these areas softens the shellac should the jewels need to be reset.

 

14 hours ago, grsnovi said:

Be careful as alcohol will dissolve it.

Thanks kindly🙏 
yeah I made sure to avoid any alcohols when cleaning this and anything with jewels - but this is great to know, otherwise I would have gone out of my way to try and get the brown off! 
 

Incidentally, I did clean these at around 50 degree (Celsius) - hope that wasn’t hot enough to displace anything! I’ll get these under a proper microscope today and get some better photos!

Posted
13 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

The shellac still looks intact ws.  I dont think you have a problem. What was your cleaning solution ws ?

whew, great to know!

I used a liquid called Shellite (or Recosol R55). It's basically naphta; we're fairly limited to what we can get here in Australia, and everything is super expensive to import!

Posted
4 minutes ago, Watchscience said:

whew, great to know!

I used a liquid called Shellite (or Recosol R55). It's basically naphta; we're fairly limited to what we can get here in Australia, and everything is super expensive to import!

I've not heard of that but sounds like its designed to protect the shellac. I noticed you mentioned cleaning at 50 degrees. Please be careful with naptha around this temperature regarding its flashpoint. Im assuming it was in a glass jar in the sonic bath.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I've not heard of that but sounds like its designed to protect the shellac. I noticed you mentioned cleaning at 50 degrees. Please be careful with naptha around this temperature regarding its flashpoint. Im assuming it was in a glass jar in the sonic bath.

Yes correct - ultrasonic cleaner in a glass jar.. thankfully nothing went wrong, but i think in future i'll change this to 40 degrees instead. no need to go so hot..

Posted
3 minutes ago, Watchscience said:

Yes correct - ultrasonic cleaner in a glass jar.. thankfully nothing went wrong, but i think in future i'll change this to 40 degrees instead. no need to go so hot..

I think the reduction in temp will have little effect on the cleaning as its mostly the vibrations that get the cleaning done. And much safer 👍. Im curious as to how clean you are getting the parts with this product you are using. I do use naptha but not one specified for cleaning watch parts. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I think the reduction in temp will have little effect on the cleaning as its mostly the vibrations that get the cleaning done. And much safer 👍. Im curious as to how clean you are getting the parts with this product you are using. I do use naptha but not one specified for cleaning watch parts. 

To be honest, this is the first time i've ever cleaned any watch parts. Not only that, the parts came from a brand new movement which was pretty clean to begin with!

Once I finish putting this one together i'll do my first real full service project with an old trench watch which is super dirty and not working.

I'll pop some photos and my thoughts on the results and let you know!

Posted
6 minutes ago, Watchscience said:

To be honest, this is the first time i've ever cleaned any watch parts. Not only that, the parts came from a brand new movement which was pretty clean to begin with!

Once I finish putting this one together i'll do my first real full service project with an old trench watch which is super dirty and not working.

I'll pop some photos and my thoughts on the results and let you know!

That will be a completely different experience ws. We look forward to hearing about and helping you with that one. There are some very knowledgable  pros here that I'm sure will give you their time with that one.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

i'll be honest ..... the whole process so far has been just as hard as i thought it would be! 😛

i suspect (and thoroughly hope) that it gets easier with practice.

Nevertheless, i've loved the experience so far!

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Watchscience said:

i'll be honest ..... the whole process so far has been just as hard as i thought it would be! 😛

i suspect (and thoroughly hope) that it gets easier with practice.

Nevertheless, i've loved the experience so far!

Good attitude to have mate. A lot of folk underestimate right from the beginning what is involved and then get sorely disappointed and eventually give it up as a bad job. Some you tube vids dont help either as they make it look far too easy. Some days will be great others you will be tearing your hair out over. This just doesn't  apply to beginners either, guys that have been doing it for years still have problems. Take the rough with the smooth, the good with the bad. Enjoy the challenges rather than fear them and just work through them as you would anything in life. A calm logical approach is your best friend, if frustration starts to ensue be sure you know when you need a cuppa break or else it can end up a watch break. But most of all enjoy this fascinating rewarding hobby whatever each encounter brings. Good to have you here my mate 👍

  • Thanks 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
    • What browser are you using Rich? Fine for me using Chrome 
×
×
  • Create New...