Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

20220509_190434.thumb.jpg.7cbae211a2f6230bef4b131f7912f866.jpg

I just received this non-working Benrus Citation this afternoon. 

I had a hard time getting the caseback off but managed it with the use of my bezel/caseback removal tool.

20220509_190446.thumb.jpg.e2c74e08cba7fbb2014c2e5ae33ae398.jpg

Initial testing shows that the pcb is shorted. The balance seems to be ok and swings freely. 

I removed the pcb and tested the coils. It appears to have 2 coils and resistance test shows that the coils are ok.

The movement is an ESA 9158. 

Does anyone happen to have a copy of the ESA 9158 service manual. A circuit diagram would be most useful.

TIA

20220509_223307.thumb.jpg.10b2f5a8bb0a382a74bbe35a2a2041b8.jpg

Here is a close up of the circuit. 

There is just 1 component that I can't identify. What is that silvery blob connected across the resistor? Logically, it should be a capacitor but I've never seen anything like that. 

Probably I need the assistance of @LittleWatchShop. What's that mystery component?

Posted
35 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

What's that mystery component?

My initial guess is that it is a diode used to snub reverse EMF when the transistor turns off causing the collector voltage to swing beyond the positive voltage of the battery.  Standard practice when driving a coil.

There appears to be some non-factory soldering going on there.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

My initial guess is that it is a diode used to snub reverse EMF when the transistor turns off causing the collector voltage to swing beyond the positive voltage of the battery.  Standard practice when driving a coil.

There appears to be some non-factory soldering going on there.

I did an image search on google and I see similar sub standard soldering work. I really wonder what's going on. 

s-l300.jpg.776a3fda339c993058272d618c84884d.jpg

I also see some models with a blue metal can device.

I guess I need to dissect it out of the epoxy and test it on the bench.

Posted
4 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

and test it on the bench

You have access to the terminals of the device, so you can test to see if it is a diode.

Can you point to where the coils are connected?  I cannot see from the images.

The other image you posted makes me think it is a capacitor...so I am leaning that way.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

You have access to the terminals of the device, so you can test to see if it is a diode.

Can you point to where the coils are connected?  I cannot see from the images.

The other image you posted makes me think it is a capacitor...so I am leaning that way.

 

I can't figure out the layout of the circuit yet, as the ends of the coils are embedded in epoxy and soldered to terminalswhich have tracks embedded in the green plastic molding. I'll work on it tomorrow and hopefully produce a schematic. 

Posted

Typically in electric watch repair there are no schematics. That's because typically in watch repair you not repairing at the component level. It's a module or circuit board it's not component repair. This only becomes an issue if you're trying to restore vintage and the manufacture it never anticipated that you would be doing that so as a consequence there are typically no schematics.

Strangely enough there was a discussion of this movement just a little while back

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/22373-esa-9158-nos-case-for-balance-complete/

then to me your mystery component looks like a tantalum capacitor. Maybe it's a regular electrolytic capacitor but that's not what it looks like to me.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

to me your mystery component looks like a tantalum capacitor. Maybe it's a regular electrolytic capacitor but that's not what it looks like to me.

That was my guess too. But I've never seen a "naked" tantalum capacitor. There is no epoxy coating with any numbers or colour code.

Posted
1 hour ago, HectorLooi said:

That was my guess too. But I've never seen a "naked" tantalum capacitor. There is no epoxy coating with any numbers or colour code.

Well, it can be divined once we see the connections to the coils.

Posted
5 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Does it make sense?

Yes, it makes sense.  The capacitor is a very high value...perhaps 1uF.  It is a short circuit at the oscillating frequency.  The resistor is there to bias the transistor.  Maybe the coil resistance is 5K which without the 2.5M resistor (RGG is 2500000), that would bias the base current at 200u which is probably too high. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks @LittleWatchShop

I think the tantalum capacitor is shorted. I'll probably need to rebuild the circuit as all the leads are actually factory spot welded. I think you are correct, someone tried to repair by soldering it at a later date.

Posted
4 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Thanks @LittleWatchShop

I think the tantalum capacitor is shorted. I'll probably need to rebuild the circuit as all the leads are actually factory spot welded. I think you are correct, someone tried to repair by soldering it at a later date.

You should be able to find one small enough size.  Alternative would to use a 1206 SMD capacitor...just a little trickier to assemble.


Going the SMD route, I would do this surgury and attachment.  You just cannot let the heat stay long, otherwise the other joints will melt.

2022-05-10 17_00_26-Benrus Citation Electronic - Watch Repairs Help & Advice - Watch Repair Talk — M.png

  • Thanks 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
×
×
  • Create New...