Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Black- / Locksmiths and Clock- / Watchmakers,

Is anyone interested swapping an ESA 9158 complete balance for a NOS ESA 9158 case? I fell in love with the ESA 9158 now and want to make two of them work, unfortunately I got 6 balance completes but all of them have a broken pivot. I also got a number of NOS stainless steel ESA 9158 cases, have a look at the pics.

Take care,

Lui

 

8.jpg

9.jpg

10.jpg

11.jpg

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Hi. Is this a common issue of the esa 9158 ?

I assume it is as common with the ESA 9158 as any other watch with a balance staff. I was just very unfortunate, i bought this lot together as used movements and all of them had a broken pivot. Interesting thing is that thew swung nicely not showing the sign that they are broken, they even run when they rest on the pivot which is not broken. I let one of them run for more than a day long.

9 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

you forgot to include the picture of the movement? I suspect a lot of people probably don't understand what kind of watch this is so I have a link just in case and it has a picture the movement.  in other words this isn't your normal mechanical watch.

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&ETA-ESA_9158

 

Thank you John, i was in a rush, family, work and garden keeps me busy recently. I studied electric engineering and I love that discrete electronic components are merged with a mechanical watch movement. Very exciting! 😍

Here is a blog about one: https://blog.noq2.net/wittnauer-electronic-repaired.html

Edited by luiazazrambo
  • Like 1
Posted

what is interesting with broken pivots on a balance staff are when you look at the picture that appears to be a system to prevent pivots from breaking? On the other hand it's a heavy balance wheel running at a really fast rate so maybe the system didn't work?

then I found it a parts list and unfortunate problem with some of the parts list star that this is probably the entire repair manual but because a material house had it all they cared about were the parts so conceivably there is a manual out there for servicing of this otherwise you get one of the similar in the series manuals and that would be good enough for you probably

then I have a website that will give you a history of your watch and show you a few others and then you can go explore the rest of the website filled with electric watches

https://electric-watches.co.uk/movement-types/transistorised/

 

 

3560_ETA 9157, 9158.pdf

  • Like 1
Posted

I tried to find an answer why did we think that these balances are still ok and the pivots are not broken. Well have a look at the video I uploaded to youtube. Here you can see the upper part of the balance staff after the jewels are removed. I made the video after I removed the battery and the balance wheel was slowing down otherwise it is too fast to see whats going on. So you can see that the upper pivot is broken, the balance is resting on the lower pivot which is intact. The interesting thing is that the upper part of the balance staff is in a hole and the hole does not let the balance staff tilt too much, preventing excessive side shake. My theory is that this is planned and this is how they tried to prevent the balance wheel plates rub on the coil if one of the pivot is broken so the coil would not be damaged by them. As you can see the hole diameter is a lot larger than the balance staff diameter, the balance wheel happily runs this way, but makes some noise as it is rattling in its whole while swinging. If I turn the movement upside down it stops of course. If the lower pivot would be broken too the balance wheel would sink further down and I assume it would not run at all neither DU or DD. Conclusion: if only one of the pivot is broken it is very difficult to see if if it is really broken without taking the balance complete out because the balance wheel swing nicely and has no excessive side shake. (This is my theory at least.)

ESA9158 still swinging

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, luiazazrambo said:

I tried to find an answer why did we think that these balances are still ok and the pivots are not broken. Well have a look at the video I uploaded to youtube. Here you can see the upper part of the balance staff after the jewels are removed. I made the video after I removed the battery and the balance wheel was slowing down otherwise it is too fast to see whats going on. So you can see that the upper pivot is broken, the balance is resting on the lower pivot which is intact. The interesting thing is that the upper part of the balance staff is in a hole and the hole does not let the balance staff tilt too much, preventing excessive side shake. My theory is that this is planned and this is how they tried to prevent the balance wheel plates rub on the coil if one of the pivot is broken so the coil would not be damaged by them. As you can see the hole diameter is a lot larger than the balance staff diameter, the balance wheel happily runs this way, but makes some noise as it is rattling in its whole while swinging. If I turn the movement upside down it stops of course. If the lower pivot would be broken too the balance wheel would sink further down and I assume it would not run at all neither DU or DD. Conclusion: if only one of the pivot is broken it is very difficult to see if if it is really broken without taking the balance complete out because the balance wheel swing nicely and has no excessive side shake. (This is my theory at least.)

ESA9158 still swinging

Dont you want to take the balance out and have a good inspection of it? 

Posted
22 minutes ago, luiazazrambo said:

So you can see that the upper pivot is broken, the balance is resting on the lower pivot which is intact.

Actually what I'm seeing is confusion? Looking at the video again reading your text what I'm seeing is lots and lots of confusion all yours and a little mine?

It looks to me like your pivot is intact I can see your pivot. Why is it flopping around well that's easy where's the jewel?

To give you a clue of what I'm thinking I'm attaching a picture of a different balance protection system. If you are to remove the end stone and the hole jewel in its setting then when you look at side view of the picture you'll see that your balance pivot is sticking up flopping around in a hole exactly what I'm seeing in your video.

Now it is possible because your video socks as we really need a side view. It's possible maybe the pivot really isn't there but it looks like it's their. The only way can really tell about your balance is you have to take the balance out and look at the side view of the pivot and see if it's intact or not. It's possible because this is a different system am that somehow the pivot did break which is really unlikely as it has a system to prevent the. That's why when it's flopping around his flopping around on the edge of the staff which is designed to keep the pivot from breaking and the jewel setting is supposed to move on impact the same as the setting in the picture moves on impact. It might also be possible somebody didn't lubricate correctly that the pivot just ground itself off with time. But it still looks like a pivot sticking up to me we really need a side view

Incabloc side.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi John, I took out all 6 balances and they all have a broken pivot. That particular one on the video has a broken upper pivot, possibly not so visible as the video was made from above. The balance is rattling with or without the jewels because of the missing pivot I only removed the jewels so we could see the end of the staff and the hole.

Posted
1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

Actually what I'm seeing is confusion? Looking at the video again reading your text what I'm seeing is lots and lots of confusion all yours and a little mine?

It looks to me like your pivot is intact I can see your pivot. Why is it flopping around well that's easy where's the jewel?

To give you a clue of what I'm thinking I'm attaching a picture of a different balance protection system. If you are to remove the end stone and the hole jewel in its setting then when you look at side view of the picture you'll see that your balance pivot is sticking up flopping around in a hole exactly what I'm seeing in your video.

Now it is possible because your video socks as we really need a side view. It's possible maybe the pivot really isn't there but it looks like it's their. The only way can really tell about your balance is you have to take the balance out and look at the side view of the pivot and see if it's intact or not. It's possible because this is a different system am that somehow the pivot did break which is really unlikely as it has a system to prevent the. That's why when it's flopping around his flopping around on the edge of the staff which is designed to keep the pivot from breaking and the jewel setting is supposed to move on impact the same as the setting in the picture moves on impact. It might also be possible somebody didn't lubricate correctly that the pivot just ground itself off with time. But it still looks like a pivot sticking up to me we really need a side view

Incabloc side.JPG

I was in the same confusion as John. Taking the balance out to inspect would have taken away any guesswork.

1 hour ago, luiazazrambo said:

Hi John, I took out all 6 balances and they all have a broken pivot. That particular one on the video has a broken upper pivot, possibly not so visible as the video was made from above. The balance is rattling with or without the jewels because of the missing pivot I only removed the jewels so we could see the end of the staff and the hole.

👍 I think we understand now. So what is your position now. To carry on looking for an intact balance staff or to repivot or make a staff ?

Posted

Reading of my own post made me think that I probably was not very clear about the situation. Let me try again: I bought 6 ESA 9158 movements in belief that all had a working balance with intact pivots. When they arrived they all seemed to be ok as the balance was swinging freely and could not identify excessive side shake so I cleaned the first good looking and complete movement, cleaned the balance and during re-assembly I realized that one of the pivot of the balance staff was broken. Not to worry I had other 5 so I took the next balance but one of the pivot was broken I took the next one but one of the pivot was broken and so on with all 5! Incredible! So the question I tried to answer with the video I made was: How is it possible that we could not identify the broken pivot just by swinging the balance wheel and checking the side shake. I thought that if the pivot is broken there is always an excessive side shake. I also must say that I usually do not touch a movement which is not at least 50 years old or so.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, luiazazrambo said:

Reading of my own post made me think that I probably was not very clear about the situation. Let me try again: I bought 6 ESA 9158 movements in belief that all had a working balance with intact pivots. When they arrived they all seemed to be ok as the balance was swinging freely and could not identify excessive side shake so I cleaned the first good looking and complete movement, cleaned the balance and during re-assembly I realized that one of the pivot of the balance staff was broken. Not to worry I had other 5 so I took the next balance but one of the pivot was broken I took the next one but one of the pivot was broken and so on with all 5! Incredible! So the question I tried to answer with the video I made was: How is it possible that we could not identify the broken pivot just by swinging the balance wheel and checking the side shake. I thought that if the pivot is broken there is always an excessive side shake. I also must say that I usually do not touch a movement which is not at least 50 years old or so.

I did eventually figure that out matey after rereading a couple of times and also reading between the lines. Aw mate bless you that's some crappy luck you had there. But obviously just enough of the balance pivot left riding in the jewel setting. Maybe just the cone and a fraction of the pivot keeping it in place. I did exactly the same with a beautiful  50s Venus I bought of ebay. The guy posted a video of the balance oscillating, it did look a little rough running and a tad noisy tbh, but I wanted it all the same. Yes it has a teeny weeny pivot left. I plan to give the balance staff a big oak to ride on. I'm not saying nothing apart from might be best if I don't post much today lol 🤔

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Sounded wrong, personally I don't think I particularly improved the sentence that much 🤷‍♂️
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I have ordered a few balance completes, and they came with two different impulse jewel. To my astonishment they both work. I assume this is because of this funny escape wheel what we have here. Going to take a pic later about it, it is really handsome trust me.

IMG_0228.thumb.JPG.8d0bcec57d338289e0ca41031f653b1f.JPG

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)

Here is our "escape" wheel. If you think about it the direction of the power is the opposite compared to a "normal" mechanical watch. The balance wheel is driving the train, and using the "escape" wheel only for the means of the power transmission? Not sure if I use the right terminology or function names here.

IMG_0235.thumb.JPG.314b55225bbcaedab3b19246a1b1ff3a.JPG

Edited by luiazazrambo
Posted
11 hours ago, luiazazrambo said:

I have ordered a few balance completes, and they came with two different impulse jewel. To my astonishment they both work. I assume this is because of this funny escape wheel what we have here. Going to take a pic later about it, it is really handsome trust me.

IMG_0228.thumb.JPG.8d0bcec57d338289e0ca41031f653b1f.JPG

Wow very different.  And both fit the pallet fork ?

43 minutes ago, luiazazrambo said:

Here is our "escape" wheel. If you think about it the direction of the power is the opposite compared to a "normal" mechanical watch. The balance wheel is driving the train, and using the "escape" wheel only for the means of the power transmission? Not sure if I use the right terminology or function names here.

IMG_0235.thumb.JPG.314b55225bbcaedab3b19246a1b1ff3a.JPG

No pallet ?

3 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

The balance wheel is driving the train, and using the "escape" wheel only for the means of the power transmission? 

No mainspring or barrel ?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

No pallet ?

 

7 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

No mainspring or barrel ?

A lot of electric watches were like this no pallet fork and its electric no mainspring.

The watches like this have a very clever design. The escape wheel is held in place with a tiny magnet. In one direction the balance wheel will pick up one tooth of the escape wheel. The other direction it goes by either not touching at all are barely touching. Or basically escape wheel moves a little out of the way it goes back in the place.

An awards a very clever design that requires very little power to run

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

The escape wheel is held in place with a tiny magnet. In one direction the balance wheel will pick up one tooth of the escape wheel. The other direction it goes by either not touching at all are barely touching. Or basically escape wheel moves a little out of the way it goes back in the place.

Is this magnet making the escape wheel act like a rotor in a quartz watch ?

Posted
1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Is this magnet making the escape wheel act like a rotor in a quartz watch ?

No. Technically there is more than one magnet in this watch as the coil is stationary there's a magnet on the balance wheel.  The coil serves two purposes the magnet causes the coil to engage the triggering coil that turns on the transistor that drives the rest of the coil which causes the impulse for the balance wheel. Then there's a tiny magnet under one of the teeth of the escape wheel that keeps it in place. So that magnet is only they are just as a keeping the escape wheel where it's supposed to be.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
    • What browser are you using Rich? Fine for me using Chrome 
×
×
  • Create New...