Jump to content

Ackro watch history


Recommended Posts

Hi . I bought this a little while ago in a job lot. It came with a lovely Smiths dress watch, it didn't look much and I thought it was just added to make up the numbers. After cleaning it and making it run  I kind of like it in a beater sort of way. Ive tried to date it, but I'm coming up short.  All I have is Oberon Watch Company, may have been just one of their dial names. Constructa, and Interpol is also mentioned if anyone has one of those. Ronda movement ? RG is printed on the barrel Bridge but nothing  else relavant. Thanks

20220415_151616.jpg

20220415_151948.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi again @Neverenoughwatches

Information on Ebosa is sparse and Ackro doesn't appear in Mikrolisk's comprehensive list of trademarks.

There's some basic information at https://watch-wiki.org/index.php?title=Ebosa_S.A. if you let your browser take the strain on translation. Could the 'RG' signify R.Glocker since this family owned Ebosa?

Maybe to confirm you have an Ebosa - and assuming this is a 10.5 ligne* sized movement too - then take a look at the keyless works. [*Bestfit lists the 65 as a 10.5 ligne movement but Ranfft indicates it also came in an 11.5 ligne size].

This is the silhouette of the keyless works from Bestfit:
image.png.0512873306abd99b04085a6031864705.png

You ask if I've worked on this movement type ... and I don't believe I have. However given your post history on this forum indicating a good experience level I don't think this movement will throw up challenges. Just take pics as you go along in the disassembly since information is clearly sparse.

Noting that Cousins does stock a few parts for the Ebosa.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

Hi again @Neverenoughwatches

Information on Ebosa is sparse and Ackro doesn't appear in Mikrolisk's comprehensive list of trademarks.

There's some basic information at https://watch-wiki.org/index.php?title=Ebosa_S.A. if you let your browser take the strain on translation. Could the 'RG' signify R.Glocker since this family owned Ebosa?

  - and assuming this is a 10.5 ligne* sized movement too - then take a look at the keyless works. [*Bestfit lists the 65 as a 10.5 ligne movement but Ranfft indicates it also came in an 11.5 ligne size].

This is the silhouette of the keyless works from Bestfit:
image.png.0512873306abd99b04085a6031864705.png

You ask if I've worked on this movement type ... and I don't believe I have. However given your post history on this forum indicating a good experience level I don't think this movement will throw up challenges. Just take pics as you go along in the disassembly since information is clearly sparse.

Noting that Cousins does stock a few parts for the Ebosa.

Thank you Watchmaker. I found it on ranfft, the same movement exactly bang on thank you apart from the long indicator on the regulator, mine doesn't have. It just needed a clean really and has been running well for a while now with good amplitude. It was good to work on, no problems. Needs a new crystal though. Only been repairing 6 months maybe on and off and only been on the forum just over a week, my posing is a bit prolific tbh as I do enjoy it. I appreciate  the time you've taken to help me date it, very kind of you.

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/16/2022 at 5:20 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Hi . I bought this a little while ago in a job lot. It came with a lovely Smiths dress watch, it didn't look much and I thought it was just added to make up the numbers. After cleaning it and making it run  I kind of like it in a beater sort of way. Ive tried to date it, but I'm coming up short.  All I have is Oberon Watch Company, may have been just one of their dial names. Constructa, and Interpol is also mentioned if anyone has one of those. Ronda movement ? RG is printed on the barrel Bridge but nothing  else relavant. Thanks

20220415_151616.jpg

20220415_151948.jpg

 

 

Interesting topic, @Neverenoughwatches and here are my contributions to the brand names you mention:

First up, my Ackro running on a 1j Baumgartner 866 with crown at “4”. The wordmark typeface is slightly different from yours, but I’ve little doubt they are the same brand. Some previous research (now lost) on mine indicated that the “Ackro” name was given to watches imported and sold by Gaumont Watch Co of Manchester, England.

Next up, my Constructa running on a 21j Ebosa 65. IIRC, Constructa is, or was, the company owned by Mondaine for the production of watches with pin lever movements.

Last up of this unholy trinity is my Interpol, again with the mighty 1j Baumgartner 866. An awful watch which, with some hundreds of more deserving cases, I’ve never been in a hurry to have restored, nor am I likely to.

And now, at the risk of courting controversy, I’d like to return to the movement in your own Ackro and suggest that, rather than an Ebosa 65, it more closely resembles an Oberon. To all intents and purposes these movements look pretty much identical apart from minor differences to the balance cock which perhaps become more apparent when viewed side by side as per these two Ranfft images:

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Oberon (ranfft.de)

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Ebosa 65 (ranfft.de)

including the semi-circular cut-out at the end of the balance cock which, in the case of the Oberon, is shorter and deeper than that of the Ebosa 65. Unfortunately Ranfft doesn’t show an image of the Oberon’s keyless works, and a movement holder tab is obscuring the cut-out of your movement. Also, whilst not wishing to rain on anyone’s parade, I would add a note of caution to the extent that whilst Ranfft dates his illustration of the Ebosa 65 to around 1955, it is generally acknowledged that such movements could continue in use long after the specific example shown in his archive. For what it’s worth, the dial style of your own watch suggests to me a date somewhere between the late ‘60s and the mid-‘70s.

To conclude this yawn-tastic post, perhaps you’ll forgive me if I include some final images, firstly of my 21j Oberon movement which lives inside a Josmar and, lastly, of my only example of a watch made by the little-documented Oberon Watch Co, inside which lives, er, a 17j Brac 903 (!)

Regards.

Ackro v.2.jpg

Constructa 2 v.3.jpg

Interpol v.2.jpg

Josmar G.p. 21j Oberon 2019 v.3.jpg

Oberon after v.3.jpg

Oberon Brac 903 after v.3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, balaton said:

 

 

Interesting topic, @Neverenoughwatches and here are my contributions to the brand names you mention:

First up, my Ackro running on a 1j Baumgartner 866 with crown at “4”. The wordmark typeface is slightly different from yours, but I’ve little doubt they are the same brand. Some previous research (now lost) on mine indicated that the “Ackro” name was given to watches imported and sold by Gaumont Watch Co of Manchester, England.

Next up, my Constructa running on a 21j Ebosa 65. IIRC, Constructa is, or was, the company owned by Mondaine for the production of watches with pin lever movements.

Last up of this unholy trinity is my Interpol, again with the mighty 1j Baumgartner 866. An awful watch which, with some hundreds of more deserving cases, I’ve never been in a hurry to have restored, nor am I likely to.

And now, at the risk of courting controversy, I’d like to return to the movement in your own Ackro and suggest that, rather than an Ebosa 65, it more closely resembles an Oberon. To all intents and purposes these movements look pretty much identical apart from minor differences to the balance cock which perhaps become more apparent when viewed side by side as per these two Ranfft images:

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Oberon (ranfft.de)

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Ebosa 65 (ranfft.de)

including the semi-circular cut-out at the end of the balance cock which, in the case of the Oberon, is shorter and deeper than that of the Ebosa 65. Unfortunately Ranfft doesn’t show an image of the Oberon’s keyless works, and a movement holder tab is obscuring the cut-out of your movement. Also, whilst not wishing to rain on anyone’s parade, I would add a note of caution to the extent that whilst Ranfft dates his illustration of the Ebosa 65 to around 1955, it is generally acknowledged that such movements could continue in use long after the specific example shown in his archive. For what it’s worth, the dial style of your own watch suggests to me a date somewhere between the late ‘60s and the mid-‘70s.

To conclude this yawn-tastic post, perhaps you’ll forgive me if I include some final images, firstly of my 21j Oberon movement which lives inside a Josmar and, lastly, of my only example of a watch made by the little-documented Oberon Watch Co, inside which lives, er, a 17j Brac 903 (!)

Regards.

Ackro v.2.jpg

Constructa 2 v.3.jpg

Interpol v.2.jpg

Josmar G.p. 21j Oberon 2019 v.3.jpg

Oberon after v.3.jpg

Oberon Brac 903 after v.3.jpg

That's really good of you balaton. Tbh I did think it looked 20 years younger than 1955. What about the only lettering on the mainplate rg. It was suggest r glocker  the owner of ebosa. I will check the cut out on the balance  cock to see if its there. Would there be some connection though between obosa  and oberon , as the movement design is so close. And Manchester  is only miles from me, so it hasn't come far. I will check out the sellers  location as well. You've got me digging now 👍

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

That's really good of you balaton. Tbh I did think it looked 20 years younger than 1955. What about the only lettering on the mainplate rg. It was suggest r glocker  the owner of ebosa. I will check the cut out on the balance  cock to see if its there. Would there be some connection though between obosa  and oberon , as the movement design is so close. And Manchester  is only miles from me, so it hasn't come far. I will check out the sellers  location as well. You've got me digging now 👍

You’re welcome.

I’m afraid I can’t say whether the “RG” has any significance to Ebosa’s owner or whether it’s purely a coincidence.

However, I can say that other makes of pin lever movements also have different combinations of two letters, particularly Louis Newmark’s original Newmark Watch Co (not the resurrected company of the same name) which was based in Croydon. For a while in the 1950s they made their own calibres which, in my experience, all have various two-letter combos, thought to be factory production identifiers for internal reference purposes only.  

In addition, as you’ll see in the attached image, the BFG 866 in my dreadful Interpol watch also has two letters (GR) stamped on it which similarly seem to bear no discernible relation to either Baumgartner or Ilona Watch Co.

I’m not immediately aware of any historical connection between Ebosa and Oberon, the latter company being started by Erwin Rudolf in 1951. However, such is the apparent paucity of documented facts about both companies, it would be somewhat cavalier to dismiss it out of hand.

Regards.

 

Interpol BFG 866 v.2.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, balaton said:

You’re welcome.

I’m afraid I can’t say whether the “RG” has any significance to Ebosa’s owner or whether it’s purely a coincidence.

However, I can say that other makes of pin lever movements also have different combinations of two letters, particularly Louis Newmark’s original Newmark Watch Co (not the resurrected company of the same name) which was based in Croydon. For a while in the 1950s they made their own calibres which, in my experience, all have various two-letter combos, thought to be factory production identifiers for internal reference purposes only.  

In addition, as you’ll see in the attached image, the BFG 866 in my dreadful Interpol watch also has two letters (GR) stamped on it which similarly seem to bear no discernible relation to either Baumgartner or Ilona Watch Co.

I’m not immediately aware of any historical connection between Ebosa and Oberon, the latter company being started by Erwin Rudolf in 1951. However, such is the apparent paucity of documented facts about both companies, it would be somewhat cavalier to dismiss it out of hand.

Regards.

 

Interpol BFG 866 v.2.jpg

Thank you for all that information.  You really know your history. I love to repair but I am only a beginner, but enjoy the history behind the brands just as much. I find that knowing the history helps me with my buying, I mostly repair vintage Swiss, i have a thing for Oris . But also history of British makers, the Smiths and Rolex story of Everest was fascinating. Incidentally the design of your BFG 866, with the long sweeping click, and the 3 studded balance cock I've seen used in Smiths Empire,  Ingersoll and Services. I found the Ingersol history good as well linking with Smiths for a short time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thank you for all that information.  You really know your history. I love to repair but I am only a beginner, but enjoy the history behind the brands just as much. I find that knowing the history helps me with my buying, I mostly repair vintage Swiss, i have a thing for Oris . But also history of British makers, the Smiths and Rolex story of Everest was fascinating. Incidentally the design of your BFG 866, with the long sweeping click, and the 3 studded balance cock I've seen used in Smiths Empire,  Ingersoll and Services. I found the Ingersol history good as well linking with Smiths for a short time.

I'm glad that you found my ramblings to be of some interest. And yes, delving into the histories of many long-gone original brands, including those you've mentioned, can be rewarding if not really, really frustrating much of the time.

Regards.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, I have created a solution to the above, I have made a fake protonmail account, if you PM me I can send you the password, just click on the contact link and enter your information, this should be as secure as it gets:     Login: email as highlighted in above screenshot WRTArk    @   Proton.    me Password: ..........PM me and I'll let you know   Only intend to use the contacts function, not the email or anything else - we are all grown ups, please act responsibly.
    • I went with 8.90£ because 12th century Italian mathematicians are always excellent topics to bring up when trying to get your guests to go home. 
    • As a beginner, I’ve found this forum invaluable. I doubt I would’ve persevered without its support. I’ve had the confidence to attempt things that seemed to me impossible only because I knew there were patient and giving folks gathered around this watering hole, available to share their skill.    I would very much like to know where to go if this one dries up and everyone needs to decamp.  There’s something special about the folks gathered in this group.  How to keep in touch?  
    • After a 3-week work fiasco that took up 137% of my time, I was finally able to get back to restoring a G. Boley 8mm lathe I picked up on eBay. I still need to do a bit of polishing on the tailstock but it works very nicely. Before and after pictures below. In any case, when I was reassembling the motor I wasn't quite sure which side the pully attached to, or if it matters. My question is ... does it matter? The listing photo below shows it the reverse of how I have it now, but it seemed that the cord and the reversing lever(s) should be on the right away from the belt.   
    • Thanks Richard.  That’s clear.   So - another question - how much latitude is there in barrel and spring sizing? Say I have have measured the ID of my barrel to be 9mm and (all other mainspring specs being equal), the closest match I can find for a replacement mainspring is listed with an 8.5mm barrel size, is it acceptable to fit the smaller spring in to the slightly larger barrel without compromising anything functionally?  I’m in this situation now with an AS 1686 which has a 9mm barrel, but the closest replacement I can find has an 8.5mm diameter listed in its specs.  I can find an alternative 9mm spring, but would have to accept a different thickness.  I’m unsure how much wriggle room is acceptable, or whether in mainspring sizing, there’s a priority - ie thickness over barrel size etc. Thanks again for any info.  Cheers, John  
×
×
  • Create New...