Jump to content

Ackro watch history


Recommended Posts

Hi . I bought this a little while ago in a job lot. It came with a lovely Smiths dress watch, it didn't look much and I thought it was just added to make up the numbers. After cleaning it and making it run  I kind of like it in a beater sort of way. Ive tried to date it, but I'm coming up short.  All I have is Oberon Watch Company, may have been just one of their dial names. Constructa, and Interpol is also mentioned if anyone has one of those. Ronda movement ? RG is printed on the barrel Bridge but nothing  else relavant. Thanks

20220415_151616.jpg

20220415_151948.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi again @Neverenoughwatches

Information on Ebosa is sparse and Ackro doesn't appear in Mikrolisk's comprehensive list of trademarks.

There's some basic information at https://watch-wiki.org/index.php?title=Ebosa_S.A. if you let your browser take the strain on translation. Could the 'RG' signify R.Glocker since this family owned Ebosa?

Maybe to confirm you have an Ebosa - and assuming this is a 10.5 ligne* sized movement too - then take a look at the keyless works. [*Bestfit lists the 65 as a 10.5 ligne movement but Ranfft indicates it also came in an 11.5 ligne size].

This is the silhouette of the keyless works from Bestfit:
image.png.0512873306abd99b04085a6031864705.png

You ask if I've worked on this movement type ... and I don't believe I have. However given your post history on this forum indicating a good experience level I don't think this movement will throw up challenges. Just take pics as you go along in the disassembly since information is clearly sparse.

Noting that Cousins does stock a few parts for the Ebosa.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

Hi again @Neverenoughwatches

Information on Ebosa is sparse and Ackro doesn't appear in Mikrolisk's comprehensive list of trademarks.

There's some basic information at https://watch-wiki.org/index.php?title=Ebosa_S.A. if you let your browser take the strain on translation. Could the 'RG' signify R.Glocker since this family owned Ebosa?

  - and assuming this is a 10.5 ligne* sized movement too - then take a look at the keyless works. [*Bestfit lists the 65 as a 10.5 ligne movement but Ranfft indicates it also came in an 11.5 ligne size].

This is the silhouette of the keyless works from Bestfit:
image.png.0512873306abd99b04085a6031864705.png

You ask if I've worked on this movement type ... and I don't believe I have. However given your post history on this forum indicating a good experience level I don't think this movement will throw up challenges. Just take pics as you go along in the disassembly since information is clearly sparse.

Noting that Cousins does stock a few parts for the Ebosa.

Thank you Watchmaker. I found it on ranfft, the same movement exactly bang on thank you apart from the long indicator on the regulator, mine doesn't have. It just needed a clean really and has been running well for a while now with good amplitude. It was good to work on, no problems. Needs a new crystal though. Only been repairing 6 months maybe on and off and only been on the forum just over a week, my posing is a bit prolific tbh as I do enjoy it. I appreciate  the time you've taken to help me date it, very kind of you.

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/16/2022 at 5:20 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Hi . I bought this a little while ago in a job lot. It came with a lovely Smiths dress watch, it didn't look much and I thought it was just added to make up the numbers. After cleaning it and making it run  I kind of like it in a beater sort of way. Ive tried to date it, but I'm coming up short.  All I have is Oberon Watch Company, may have been just one of their dial names. Constructa, and Interpol is also mentioned if anyone has one of those. Ronda movement ? RG is printed on the barrel Bridge but nothing  else relavant. Thanks

20220415_151616.jpg

20220415_151948.jpg

 

 

Interesting topic, @Neverenoughwatches and here are my contributions to the brand names you mention:

First up, my Ackro running on a 1j Baumgartner 866 with crown at “4”. The wordmark typeface is slightly different from yours, but I’ve little doubt they are the same brand. Some previous research (now lost) on mine indicated that the “Ackro” name was given to watches imported and sold by Gaumont Watch Co of Manchester, England.

Next up, my Constructa running on a 21j Ebosa 65. IIRC, Constructa is, or was, the company owned by Mondaine for the production of watches with pin lever movements.

Last up of this unholy trinity is my Interpol, again with the mighty 1j Baumgartner 866. An awful watch which, with some hundreds of more deserving cases, I’ve never been in a hurry to have restored, nor am I likely to.

And now, at the risk of courting controversy, I’d like to return to the movement in your own Ackro and suggest that, rather than an Ebosa 65, it more closely resembles an Oberon. To all intents and purposes these movements look pretty much identical apart from minor differences to the balance cock which perhaps become more apparent when viewed side by side as per these two Ranfft images:

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Oberon (ranfft.de)

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Ebosa 65 (ranfft.de)

including the semi-circular cut-out at the end of the balance cock which, in the case of the Oberon, is shorter and deeper than that of the Ebosa 65. Unfortunately Ranfft doesn’t show an image of the Oberon’s keyless works, and a movement holder tab is obscuring the cut-out of your movement. Also, whilst not wishing to rain on anyone’s parade, I would add a note of caution to the extent that whilst Ranfft dates his illustration of the Ebosa 65 to around 1955, it is generally acknowledged that such movements could continue in use long after the specific example shown in his archive. For what it’s worth, the dial style of your own watch suggests to me a date somewhere between the late ‘60s and the mid-‘70s.

To conclude this yawn-tastic post, perhaps you’ll forgive me if I include some final images, firstly of my 21j Oberon movement which lives inside a Josmar and, lastly, of my only example of a watch made by the little-documented Oberon Watch Co, inside which lives, er, a 17j Brac 903 (!)

Regards.

Ackro v.2.jpg

Constructa 2 v.3.jpg

Interpol v.2.jpg

Josmar G.p. 21j Oberon 2019 v.3.jpg

Oberon after v.3.jpg

Oberon Brac 903 after v.3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, balaton said:

 

 

Interesting topic, @Neverenoughwatches and here are my contributions to the brand names you mention:

First up, my Ackro running on a 1j Baumgartner 866 with crown at “4”. The wordmark typeface is slightly different from yours, but I’ve little doubt they are the same brand. Some previous research (now lost) on mine indicated that the “Ackro” name was given to watches imported and sold by Gaumont Watch Co of Manchester, England.

Next up, my Constructa running on a 21j Ebosa 65. IIRC, Constructa is, or was, the company owned by Mondaine for the production of watches with pin lever movements.

Last up of this unholy trinity is my Interpol, again with the mighty 1j Baumgartner 866. An awful watch which, with some hundreds of more deserving cases, I’ve never been in a hurry to have restored, nor am I likely to.

And now, at the risk of courting controversy, I’d like to return to the movement in your own Ackro and suggest that, rather than an Ebosa 65, it more closely resembles an Oberon. To all intents and purposes these movements look pretty much identical apart from minor differences to the balance cock which perhaps become more apparent when viewed side by side as per these two Ranfft images:

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Oberon (ranfft.de)

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Ebosa 65 (ranfft.de)

including the semi-circular cut-out at the end of the balance cock which, in the case of the Oberon, is shorter and deeper than that of the Ebosa 65. Unfortunately Ranfft doesn’t show an image of the Oberon’s keyless works, and a movement holder tab is obscuring the cut-out of your movement. Also, whilst not wishing to rain on anyone’s parade, I would add a note of caution to the extent that whilst Ranfft dates his illustration of the Ebosa 65 to around 1955, it is generally acknowledged that such movements could continue in use long after the specific example shown in his archive. For what it’s worth, the dial style of your own watch suggests to me a date somewhere between the late ‘60s and the mid-‘70s.

To conclude this yawn-tastic post, perhaps you’ll forgive me if I include some final images, firstly of my 21j Oberon movement which lives inside a Josmar and, lastly, of my only example of a watch made by the little-documented Oberon Watch Co, inside which lives, er, a 17j Brac 903 (!)

Regards.

Ackro v.2.jpg

Constructa 2 v.3.jpg

Interpol v.2.jpg

Josmar G.p. 21j Oberon 2019 v.3.jpg

Oberon after v.3.jpg

Oberon Brac 903 after v.3.jpg

That's really good of you balaton. Tbh I did think it looked 20 years younger than 1955. What about the only lettering on the mainplate rg. It was suggest r glocker  the owner of ebosa. I will check the cut out on the balance  cock to see if its there. Would there be some connection though between obosa  and oberon , as the movement design is so close. And Manchester  is only miles from me, so it hasn't come far. I will check out the sellers  location as well. You've got me digging now 👍

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

That's really good of you balaton. Tbh I did think it looked 20 years younger than 1955. What about the only lettering on the mainplate rg. It was suggest r glocker  the owner of ebosa. I will check the cut out on the balance  cock to see if its there. Would there be some connection though between obosa  and oberon , as the movement design is so close. And Manchester  is only miles from me, so it hasn't come far. I will check out the sellers  location as well. You've got me digging now 👍

You’re welcome.

I’m afraid I can’t say whether the “RG” has any significance to Ebosa’s owner or whether it’s purely a coincidence.

However, I can say that other makes of pin lever movements also have different combinations of two letters, particularly Louis Newmark’s original Newmark Watch Co (not the resurrected company of the same name) which was based in Croydon. For a while in the 1950s they made their own calibres which, in my experience, all have various two-letter combos, thought to be factory production identifiers for internal reference purposes only.  

In addition, as you’ll see in the attached image, the BFG 866 in my dreadful Interpol watch also has two letters (GR) stamped on it which similarly seem to bear no discernible relation to either Baumgartner or Ilona Watch Co.

I’m not immediately aware of any historical connection between Ebosa and Oberon, the latter company being started by Erwin Rudolf in 1951. However, such is the apparent paucity of documented facts about both companies, it would be somewhat cavalier to dismiss it out of hand.

Regards.

 

Interpol BFG 866 v.2.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, balaton said:

You’re welcome.

I’m afraid I can’t say whether the “RG” has any significance to Ebosa’s owner or whether it’s purely a coincidence.

However, I can say that other makes of pin lever movements also have different combinations of two letters, particularly Louis Newmark’s original Newmark Watch Co (not the resurrected company of the same name) which was based in Croydon. For a while in the 1950s they made their own calibres which, in my experience, all have various two-letter combos, thought to be factory production identifiers for internal reference purposes only.  

In addition, as you’ll see in the attached image, the BFG 866 in my dreadful Interpol watch also has two letters (GR) stamped on it which similarly seem to bear no discernible relation to either Baumgartner or Ilona Watch Co.

I’m not immediately aware of any historical connection between Ebosa and Oberon, the latter company being started by Erwin Rudolf in 1951. However, such is the apparent paucity of documented facts about both companies, it would be somewhat cavalier to dismiss it out of hand.

Regards.

 

Interpol BFG 866 v.2.jpg

Thank you for all that information.  You really know your history. I love to repair but I am only a beginner, but enjoy the history behind the brands just as much. I find that knowing the history helps me with my buying, I mostly repair vintage Swiss, i have a thing for Oris . But also history of British makers, the Smiths and Rolex story of Everest was fascinating. Incidentally the design of your BFG 866, with the long sweeping click, and the 3 studded balance cock I've seen used in Smiths Empire,  Ingersoll and Services. I found the Ingersol history good as well linking with Smiths for a short time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thank you for all that information.  You really know your history. I love to repair but I am only a beginner, but enjoy the history behind the brands just as much. I find that knowing the history helps me with my buying, I mostly repair vintage Swiss, i have a thing for Oris . But also history of British makers, the Smiths and Rolex story of Everest was fascinating. Incidentally the design of your BFG 866, with the long sweeping click, and the 3 studded balance cock I've seen used in Smiths Empire,  Ingersoll and Services. I found the Ingersol history good as well linking with Smiths for a short time.

I'm glad that you found my ramblings to be of some interest. And yes, delving into the histories of many long-gone original brands, including those you've mentioned, can be rewarding if not really, really frustrating much of the time.

Regards.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, a little bit more from today's lecture about the main springs. Generally, the spring in the barrel is limited and can't  unwind fully. With the blue line is shown the reserve/torque relation when spring unwinding is limited by the barrel. The green line represents the same when the spring is free to unwind fully And the red line shows the minimum torque that is needed for the movement to keep running. The yelow graph shows how the torque changes (from the blue) when the spring gets weaker (set) after 100 years of work. The purple line represents thinner and longer spring in the same barrel. As You can see, using thinner and longer spring will increase the power reserve. The 'set' spring will have the same reserve as a new one with the same sizes, only the amplitude will be just a little smaller.  Of course, this is true only when the movement othervice is in good health ( the red line is lo enough)
    • As long as you don't grind the stuff up and blow it around, you should be fine. Use a dust mask if in doubt.   The things I'm very careful of are: Radium lume - even the stuff that is visually completely dead and inert is still highly radioactive; it's the fluorescent part that decays, not the radium. A single speck inhaled or ingested can cause cancer, so store parts in zip bags and wear a dust mask & wipe your work area down after handling anything that uses it. A proper geiger counter is a good investment if you plan on working with vintage watches, so you can check for it & take appropriate precautions.   "One dip" & equivalents - the original type & the generic PERC dry cleaning fluid (Tetrachloroethylene / perchloroethylene) which is what the original one dip was mostly made of. That's toxic, a known carcinogen. Use in very good ventilation only & keep it sealed whenever possible.   The newer B-Dip is presumably a safer replacement.  
    • Only 137% !  sounds like you're not putting enough effort in 😆.  I would think of it like cogs on pushbike.  Fastest speed to the spindle would be largest pulley wheel on the drive and smallest pulley wheel on the driven. If the motor was into a sliding bed you would have 3x4 ? Speeds.
    • So please we have that comment.    Eccentric59.  Great work.
    • Thanks @nevenbekriev. I did some further reading and I think I kinda understand it now. Basically, if you were to fully fill the entire barrel with a super-long mainspring, you can't actually wind it anymore. Hence zero power reserve. Likewise the other extreme (mainspring too short to be wound around the arbor). This explains in very basic turns why there is a sweet spot in the middle of the curve you drew. Importantly, this is relative to the barrel diameter (and arbor diameter). In other words, if you have a larger barrel you should have a longer mainspring and hence also longer power reserve. So Longines' statement isn't entirely wrong (longer mainspring = more power reserve). BUT you can only make the mainspring longer if you also increase the barrel diameter. Thanks again for making me think about this a bit more and learning something. That's why I love this forum!   However 😉, there is still some truth to what I said (I think! Please correct me if I'm wrong!): according to my reading, the key parameter is the share of the space between barrel arbor and barrel wall. Half of which should be occupied by the mainspring (based on Theory of Horology by WOSTEP, quote in depth here: https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/mainsprings.php).  The space occupied by the mainspring in the barrel is a simple function of mainspring length AND thickness.  This implies that increasing length, but keeping the same thickness, will lead to occupying too much of the barrel space and hence reducing power reserve. This is what @nevenbekriev 's drawing correctly shows. However, if you increase length AND decrease thickness in the correct ratio, you can maintain the correct mainspring proportion vis-a-vis the barrel (i.e. occupying half of the space between arbor and barrel wall).  This would indeed lead to an increase of the number of barrel revolutions (when unwinding) and hence a potential increase in power reserve. However, you loose torque. And a loss of torque will also lead to the watch stopping earlier (when torque can't overcome the friction in the gear train). Thus, these two opposing effects may cancel each other out. Which again makes this statement probably true:    FINALLY, we still want to help @Zendoc with his very concrete decision:  GR4485 (same thickness but shorter than original) or GR4477 (slightly thinner and a bit longer than original).  I would still advocate (considering modern lubricants and potentially stronger metal alloys -- and consequently the risk of knocking at full wind) to choose the latter.        
×
×
  • Create New...